Sinusitis Anhang
Kali-bi.: ?Sommermittel?
Luffa.: ?Wintermittel?
[Subrata K. Banerjea]
Hekla.: Sinus after mastoid operation. 30C
Hep.: Nose blocked and > if secretion commence. Offensive discharge,
like old cheese. < from dry cold wind; > in damp weather; < heat and
extremely irritable
Kali-i.: Frontal sinuses. Fullness in nose. Great relief from walking.
< heat and extremely irritable
Kali-s.: Maxillary sinuses. Kali sulph is like a Pulsatilla patient,
weepy, irritable, upset by hot room and hot. < stooping. >> in open
air. Discharges thick, yellowish.
[Nomthandazo Dlamini]
The purpose of this double blind placebo controlled study was to
evaluate the efficacy of the main miasmatic nosodes in the treatment of chronic
sinusitis in terms of the patients perception of the treatment. 30 participants
were selected for this double blind placebo controlled study, with 15 being randomly assigned to the
treatment group and 15 to the placebo group. Treatment consisted
of powders that were administered 3x daily over a period of five days,
with follow-up after three weeks.
The patients perception of the treatment was assessed using the General
Well-Being Questionnaire (McDowell and Newell, 1996) (Appendix C1) and Sinus
Symptom Visual Analogue Scale (Walker and White, 2000)
All data obtained from questionnaires was statistically analysed using a
one-sample t-test, and Mann-Whitney U test.
The General Well-Being Questionnaire results showed that there were
elements of improvement within the treatment group before and after treatment,
but there was no significant difference between the treatment group and the
placebo group.
The Sinus Symptom Visual Analogue Scale results showed that in both
groups, the scores before and after treatment showed a significant difference,
but there was no significant difference between the treatment and the placebo
group.
Thus it was concluded that that the main miasmatic nosodes are not
effective in the treatment of chronic sinusitis.
Used terms:
Rhinitis: is an inflammation of the mucous membrane of the nose (Solomon
et al., 1990: 826).
Kartageners syndrome: An autosomal recessive disorder, is frequently
associated with abnormalities of the cilia that impair mucociliary clearance in
the airways, leading to persistent infections (Kumar, 1997: 403).
Ostiomeatus: the outflow tract from the sinuses, incl. the ostium (a
tubular organ, or between distinct cavities within the body of each sinus)
(Tichenor, 2003) as well as the meati (a canal entering
a structure) (Moore, 1992: 13).
Aspergillosis: opportunistic infections caused by Aspergillus species
and inhaled as mould conidia, leading to hyphal growth and invasion of blood
vessels, hemorrhagic necrosis, infarction, and potential dissemination to other
sites in susceptible patients (Berkow and Beers, 1999:668).
Conchae: are uneven scroll-shaped elevations that form the lateral wall
of the nasal cavity (Moore, 1992: 758).
Anosmia: loss of the sense of smell (Solomon et al., 1990: 1153).
Oedema: is the swelling that occurs as a result of an increase in the
interstitial fluid (Solomon et al., 1990: 794).
Transillumination: the passage of light through body tissues for the
purpose of examination (Bates, 1995:
192).
Halitosis: offensive breath (Edwards, 1995: 415).
Somnoplasty: Radiofrequency tissue ablation of the inferior turbinates
using a thermocouple feedback electrode procedure to relieve chronic nasal
obstruction (Doctors Guide, 2003).
Sinusitis defined as a condition manifested by inflamed mucous membranes
(incl. neuroepithelium) of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses, fluids
within these cavities +/o. underlying bone
(Lanza and Kennedy, 1997).
Approximately 30% of the population is affected by sinusitis at some
point in their lifetime. Sinusitis is one of the most commonly increasing
health problems worldwide. (Tichenor, 2000.)
Often, people with chronic sinusitis complain of fatigue, lack of
concentration, poor productivity, and general discomfort (Ullman, 2002:
11-23).
Sinusitis is a condition manifested by inflammation of the mucous
membranes (incl. neuroepithelium) of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses,
fluids within these cavities, +/o. underlying bone (Lanza and Kennedy, 1997).
Chronic sinusitis is diagnosed if the sinus condition occurs for more
than 4 weeks in duration (Carr, 2002).
Sinusitis was the 5th leading cause for antibiotic prescriptions between
1985 and 1992. (Kaliner et al., 1997: S1-20).
Antibiotics do not always bring medium to long-term relief, and are
often followed by persistence of symptoms leading to a chronic state of
sinusitis that is very difficult to treat successfully (National Allergy and
Infectious Diseases, 2001).
Corticosteroids amongst the potent drugs used for chronic sinusitis in
conventional medicine often leading to conditions such as growth retardation
and poor immune systems as a result of long term treatment (McDonogh, 1999).
Even surgery gives only temporary relief and does not guarantee a permanent
recovery from sinusitis, many patients experience more congestion and swelling
of the nasal passages following this procedure (Adler, M. 1999).
Homoeopathic medicines may produce additional symptoms during the course
of treatment, but these are rarely serious or harmful, and disappear quickly
(the so called „Homoeopathic aggravation“) (Hahnemann, 1997: 220).
Homoeopathy attempts to bring each individual to the highest level of
health possible on the physical, mental, and emotional levels. In acute and
chronic disease, whether the symptoms are physical, mental, or emotional,
homoeopathy produces subtle, yet often dramatic, healing and elimination of the
underlying susceptibility to developing a disease state. (Ullman, 1995:11-23.)
Samuel Hahnemann: „the ideal cure is rapid, gentle and permanent
restoration of health in the shortest, most reliable, and most harmless way“
(Hahnemann, 1997: 92).
Implicit in this approach is the idea formulated by Hahnemann that it is
impossible to fundamentally and permanently cure a chronic disease state unless
treatment is directed towards the underlying miasm/s (Watson, 1991: 41).
Therefore the main aim of this double blind placebo controlled study was
to determine the efficacy of the main miasmatic nosodes in improving the
symptoms of chronic sinusitis in terms of the patients perception of the
treatment.
The precise aetiology and phathophysiology for sinusitis is not
perfectly clear as it is commonplace to have a clinical setting in which
sinusitis coexists with other conditions such as allergic rhinitis, cystic
fibrosis +/o. asthma (Lanza and Kennedy, 1997).
Inhalation of airborne allergens such as dust, pollen, mould, often sets
off allergic reactions such as allergic rhinitis that in turn, may contribute
towards chronic sinusitis. Certain weather conditions such as humidity (N.
hemisphere) can affect people with chronic sinusitis. (National allergy and
infectious diseases, 2000.)
The development of sinusitis depends on a variety of inciting factors
that lead to either anatomical or functional sinus outflow obstruction (Lanza
and Kennedy, 1997).
Multifactorial causes of sinusitis (Lanza and Kennedy, 1997:S2)
Host factors:
- Genetic/ congenital conditions:
Cystic fibrosis
Immotile cilia syndrome
-
Allergic/ immune conditions
- Anatomic abnormalities
-
Systemic diseases:
Endocrine
Metabolic
-
Neoplasm
Environmental factors:
-
Infectious/viral agents
-
Trauma
-
Noxious chemicals
-
Iatrogenic
Medications
Surgery
PHYSIOLOGY AND PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
The sinuses are pneumatic = air-filled extensions of the respiratory
part of the nasal cavity into the following cranial bones: frontal, ethmoid,
sphenoid, and maxilla (Moore, 1992:758). They are named according to the bones
that they lie in, namely the ethmoidal, frontal, maxillary, and sphenoidal
sinuses (Giles, 1995:39).
Genetic disorders:
1.
cystic
fibrosis (CF)
2.
immotile
cilia syndrome (Kartageners syndrome) associated with a chronic sinus disease state
where the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (cAMP dependent chloride
channels) are defective as a result of genetic mutation (Kaliner et al., 1997).
This resulting in impaired clearance of secretions and abnormal
viscidity of airway secretions that may result in colonisation and secondary
infections caused by two common pathogens:
1.
Staphylococcus
aureus
2.
Pseudomonas
aeruginosa (Kumar, 1997:208).
A role for allergies in the development of sinusitis has been suggested
but not proven (Benninger, 1997).
It has been suggested that in allergic fungal sinusitis, the progressive
epithelial damage resulting from eosinophil influx associated with the presence
of fungi and apparent allergic responses may initiate a self perpetuating,
cyclical inflammatory/immunologic response (Kaliner et al., 1997).
Histamine is the most prominent mediator of inflammation released as a
result of inhalation of airborne allergens such as dust, pollen and mould that
cause antigen-antibody reactions, followed
by increased vascular permeability, destabilised lysosomal membranes,
and other reactions that produce inflammation and mucosal swelling (Benninger,
1997).
This leads to obstruction of the sinus ostia, preventing mucus outflow,
reduction in oxygen tension, changes in mucociliary transport, and a
transudation of fluid into the sinuses, creating a suitable environment for
bacterial overgrowth (Benninger, 1997).
A gram-negative rod or anaerobic microorganism may cause exacerbations
of chronic sinusitis (Berkow and Beers, 1999: 688).
SINUSITIS IN METABOLICALLY OR IMMUNOLOGICALLY COMPROMISED PATIENTS
In patients with poorly controlled diabetes or with immunodeficiency,
aggressive and even fatal fungal or bacterial sinusitis can occur (Berkow and
Beers, 1999:688).
Mucormycosis (phycomycosis) is a mycosis caused by fungi of the order
mucorales that may develop in patients with poorly controlled diabetes that is
characterized by black, devitalised tissue in the nasal cavity (Berkow and
Beers, 1999:688).
Aspergillosis and candidiasis of the paranasal sinuses may occur in a
patient who is immunologically compromised as a result of therapy with
cytotoxic drugs or the underlying disease process in leukemia, lymphoma,
multiple myeloma, AIDS, or other immunosuppressive diseases. Aspergillosis is
characterized by polypoid tissue in the nose and paranasal sinuses (Brekow and
Beers, 1999:688).
Anatomic abnormalities such as nasal septal spurs or deviations,
hypertrophic or paradoxic middle turbinates, and concha bullosa can affect
sinus ostia outflow so that minimal mucosal swelling or inflammation from an
upper respiratory tract infection or an allergy intermittently obstructs the
sinus causing sinusitis (Benninger, 1997).
Sinusitis is often a sequela of an upper respiratory tract infection
followed by mucosal swelling that obstructs sinus outflow resulting in
infection (Benninger, 1997). The oxygen in the sinus is absorbed into the blood
vessels of the mucous membrane resulting in relative negative pressure (vacuum)
that can be painful (Berkow and Beers, 1999: 687).
Chronic sinusitis with or without polyposis is characterised by
inflammatory thickening and polypoid changes in the sinus mucosa.
Epithelial cells produce cytokines, such as interleukins that recruit
neutrophils and other T-lymphocytes, and GM-CSF (granulocyte macrophage colony
stimulating factor) that primes the eosinophils for enhanced responses to
activating stimuli by altering epithelial ion transport processes and inducing
ciliostasis. (Kaliner et al., 1997.)
This can result in bacterial colonisation by microorganisms that enter
directly through the nasal passages, spreading cellulitis or thrombophlebitis
in the lamina propria of the mucous membrane lining the nasal passages being
influenced by production of nitric oxide, which is generated by the nasal
epithelium (Berkow and Beers, 1999: 687).
Furthermore, bacterial products can affect both epithelial function and
cytokine production resulting in long term epithelial thickening and goblet
cell hyperplasia (Kaliner et al., 1997).
Headache located either frontally, interorbitally, temporally or on the
vertex.
Nasal obstruction, purulent nasal discharge, and anosmia, alteration in
the sense of smell.
Facial pain, upper dental pain, pain in and behind the eyes.
Postnasal discharge in the pharynx which looks like a thick strand or a
solid band of discoloured mucous causing continual throat clearing or hawking,
and is an important cause of secondary respiratory and gastric disorders such
as pharyngitis, earache, deafness, nausea and vomiting of clear mucous and
cough. There can also be breath odour, and fatigue present (McDonogh, 1999).
Diagnosis is based on a careful medical history and thorough physical
examination of the head and neck. All sinuses must be palpated for tenderness
(Bates, 1995:182-184).
The nasal mucosa and septum are examined using an otoscope; a nasal
speculum; or a nasal endoscope to find signs such as hyperemia, oedema, crusts,
purulence, concha bullosa, polypoid mucosa,
or cysts protruding into the meatus ( Carr, 2002). Anatomic anomalies
such as deviated septum, concha bullosa, and middle meatal polyps that cause
narrowing of the osteomeatal units should also
be noted (McDonogh, 1999).
Transillumination may be a handy diagnostic tool for diagnosis, but is
not a reliable examination (McDonogh, 1999).
X-rays of the apices of the teeth are required in chronic maxillary
sinusitis to exclude a periapical abscess (Berkow and Beers, 1999: 688).
Normal radiographs of the sinuses only show gross abnormalities within
the sinuses and do not give any idea of the extent of the disease (McDonogh,
1999).
CT scanning (coronal computed tomography) of the paranasal sinuses is
superior to radiography, and is very helpful in diagnosing difficult or recalcitrant
cases of sinusitis (Lanza andKennedy, 1997). One cut through the frontal sinus,
two cuts in the anterior ethmoid and maxillary sinuses and one cut each in the
posterior ethmoids and sphenoid sinuses will give a fairly comprehensive
picture of the extent of the disease (McDonogh, 1999).
Microscopy, culture and sensitivity (MCS) of the postnasal drip, the
sputum, and any pus from the middle meatus is another useful investigation
(McDonogh, 1999).
If necessary, other local and systemic causes should be excluded by
means of a full blood count, immunoglobulin evaluation and skin tests for
allergies.
Assessment of the ESR (erythrocyte sedimentation rate), can indicate
whether the symptoms are caused by an infection or not, especially in
complicated cases involving surrounding bone inflammation. (McDonogh, 1999.)
According to Lanza and Kennedy (1997), and Carr (2002), the basis for
diagnosis of chronic sinusitis is as follows:
The patient must have more than 2 major factors or 1 major and 2 minor
factors occurring for more than 4 weeks in duration.
Major Factors
- Facial pain/ pressure
- Facial congestion/ fullness
- Nasal obstruction
- Nasal discharge: purulent, or discoloured postnasal drainage
- Hyposmia/Anosmia
- Purulent discharge in the nose
Minor Factors
- Ear pressure/fullness
- Headache
- Halitosis
- Fatigue
- Dental pin
- Cough
Swelling of the upper eyelid, proptosis, loss of visual acuity, loss of
eye movement, swelling over the frontal sinus, signs of meningeal irritation
and secondary chest problems (McDonogh, 1999).
Sinusitis frequently complicates asthma, and medical +/o. surgical
therapy for underlying sinusitis can improve asthma (Kaliner et al., 1997).
Infection from the nasal passages can spread into the surrounding bones
of the face if left untreated, resulting in osteomyelitis (Giles et al.,
1995:40), and intracranial abscesses (Edwards, 1995: 1098).
DD.:
- Rhinitis
- Common cold
- Barre syndrome
- Upper dental Sepsis.x
- Temporomandibular joint disease
- Cervical muscular disease
- Old neck injuries (McDonough, 1999).
Treatment is aimed at restoring the health of the mucous membrane of the
osteomeatal unit, and combating infection of the sinuses and the complications
or secondary effects of these infections.
It must decrease oedema of the mucosa, thereby opening airspaces of the
infendibulum and stimulating the movement of secretion from the sinuses, and
must have bactericidal components. (McDonogh, 1999.)
Local decongestants such as oxymetazoline or xylometazoline are
advisable for a limited period only (McDonogh, 1999).
Methylxanthines are said to stimulate ciliary activity and relieve the
associated cough. Pseudoephedrine sulphate is a sympathomimetic that helps to
shrink the mucous membrane and has no effect on the viscocity of the mucous
produced. (McDonogh, 1999.)
Among antibiotics, penicillin is the drug of first choice (amoxycillin
clavulanic acid preparations). They are broad-spectrum bactericidal agents and
should be used for a minimum of 10 days initially, but for up to 4 weeks if
necessary. After the initial course, a further three weeks of antibiotic
therapy is permissible or a sulphonamide-based product can be prescribed for
one month. (McDonogh, 1999.)
Prolonged antibiotic courses are usually prescribed in unresolved cases
and for patients with complications. Tetracyclines, macrolides, antifungal
agents and metronidazole are prescribed only if indicated by the MCS (= microscopy,
culture and sensitivity) results, or if the patient is allergic to penicillin.
(McDonogh, 1999.)
If there is an allergic component, patients are advised to avoid
allergens, they are given antihistamines, systemic steroids and immunotherapy
(Carr, 2002). Anti-inflammatory agents such as corticosteroids decrease oedema
of the mucous membrane, inflammatory infiltrate of the membranes and also
stimulate ciliary activity (McDonogh, 1999).
Prednisone should be used as a single morning dose for five days and
then on alternate days for further five doses. Such drugs are not prescribed in
immunocompromised patients, since they lower then immunity and can cause growth
retardation in children if used continuously for longer than seven days.
(McDonogh, 1999.)
Patients with a nasal obstruction are advised to inhale steam from a
vaporiser or a hot cup of water to lessen the discomfort and soothe inflamed
sinuses. Hot wet compresses are applied over the inflamed area to alleviate
symptoms of congestion (National allergy and infectious diseases, 2000).
Physiotherapy usually entails up to 8 treatments sessions with nasal
douches, or nebulisation with normal saline and in a non-asthmatic patient,
sodium 2-mercaptoethane-sulphonate solution to help remove and break down thick
mucous plugs in the nasal cavity and middle meatus. Ultrasound and laser
treatment of the sinus cavities promotes movement of viscid mucous in the sinus
cavities and promotes blood flow through the mucous membrane thereby aiding
action of medication. (McDonogh, 1999.)
Surgical treatment simply allows the sinuses, which previously did not
drain, to drain through the ostia (Tichenor, 2003) as in cases of failed
medical treatment of the primary disease and its complications, and for lesions
of the osteomeatal unit that cause persistent disease. Functional endoscopic
sinus surgery (FESS) is the only surgery that can be used with accuracy in this
region and which does not destroy normal ventilatory and drainage tracts.
(McDonogh, 1999.) Some patients will develop new areas of sinusitis
post-surgically which may or may not be able to be visualized
on endoscopy and sometimes require repeat CT scans. In those cases, oral
antibiotics are more likely to be necessary and in some cases surgical revision
may be necessary. In some patients, scar tissue may form after surgery.
(Tichenor, 2003.)
In some cases, nasal obstruction is typically caused by enlargement of
the inferior nasal turbinates. Normally, turbinates swell and humidify air as
it is inhaled. Chronic turbinate enlargement blocks the air passage leading to
chronic sinusitis. (Doctors guide, 2003.)
The somnoplasty technique was developed as a means of reducing some of
the obstruction caused by the turbinates. This technique gently heats the
turbinates. As a result the turbinate will shrink down in size over the course
of 6-8 weeks. There may be minimal crusting and bleeding as a result.
(Tichenor, 2003.)
Homoeopathy is based on the fundamental principle of „Like cures like“,
meaning that,“ any substance which can produce a totality of symptoms in a
healthy human being, can cure the totality of symptoms in a sick human being“
(Vithoulkas, 1998:92).
According to homoeopathic principles, disease is not considered as
something local, or an affection of the parts, but is the state of being of the
whole person at the time, the way he/she feels, thinks and behaves. This is the
state that needs to be treated and reversed for the local body parts to
function normally. (Sankaran, 1991:10.)
Homoeopathy attempts to bring each individual to the highest level of
health possible on the physical, mental, and emotional levels. In acute and
chronic disease, whether the symptoms are physical, mental, or emotional,
homoeopathy produces subtle, yet often dramatic, healing and elimination of the
underlying susceptibility to developing a disease state. (Ullman, 1995:11-23.)
Implicit in this approach is the idea formulated by Hahnemann that it is
impossible to fundamentally and permanently cure a chronic disease state unless
treatment is directed towards the underlying miasm/s (Watson, 1991: 41).
A miasm is a predisposition toward chronic disease underlying the acute
manifestation of illness, which is transmissible from generation to generation,
and which may respond beneficially to the corresponding nosode (Vithoulkas,
1998: 133).
A nosode is a substance that is prepared from either pathological tissue
or from the appropriate drug or vaccine (Vithoulkas, 1998:133).
The pathological tissues are collected and mixed with equal parts of
spirits of wine. The next step in preparation of nosodes involves dilution and
potentisation. (Vithoulkas, 1998:160-61.)
This procedure involves a serial dilution wherein one part by volume of
a medicinal substance is diluted with 99 parts of distilled water or ethyl
alcohol, which then is shaken vigorously.
One part of this solution is diluted further with 99 parts of diluted
water or ethyl alcohol and then shaken forcefully for a definite number of
successions. (Ullman, 1991:12.)
The true natural chronic diseases are those that arise from a chronic
miasm, which when left unchecked by the employment of those homoeopathic
medicines that are specific for them, always go on growing worse (Hahnemann,
1997:166).
Miasmatic treatment is a method of prescription that is based on the
assumption that there exists in virtually everyone an inherited or an acquired
energy blockage that produces a predisposition towards a particular and
recognisable pattern of illness (Watson, 1991:41).
Eizayaga states that if a patient has „never been well since a specific
disease”, the acquired miasmatic layer should be treated with the corresponding
disease nosode in the same way as an active miasm would be treated (Watson,
1991:35).
From clinical experience of other Homoeopaths, it is evident that the
nosodes are in fact amongst the most frequently indicated homoeopathic
medicines (Watson, 1991:41).
There are different situations in which a major nosode ought to be
considered when prescribing such as:
When
the nosode is the indicated medicine (i.e. the simillimum medicine);
When
all well selected and indicated medicine fail to work;
When
a patients ailments relapse;
When
acute diseases fail to resolve;
When
the miasm obscures the symptom picture (Watson, 1991:41).
There are five major miasmatic nosodes indicated for the homoeopathic
treatment of chronic sinusitis namely;
Psorinum.
Medorhinum
Syphilinum
Tuberculinum
Carcinosinum
Paceboeffect:
The word placebo means, „I will please“ (Newman, 1994:1298). It is made
up of a medicinal inactive substance such as a starch or sugar used in
controlled studies for comparison with presumed active drugs or prescribed with
the intent to relieve symptoms or meet a patients demands, i.e. it is a „make-believe
medicine“ť, and it is allegedly inert and harmless (Berkow and Beers,
1999:2585).
There is a placebo element in every therapeutic manoeuvre (surgical and
psychological techniques/medication in any form). Thus the effects of any drug
will vary from patient to patient and doctor to doctor, depending on the
placebo reactivity studies to determine whether or not certain personality
characteristics correlate with responses to placebos have disagreed
extravagantly with one another (Berkow and Beers, 1999:2586).
The subjective and objective, desirable and undesirable effects of
placebos appear to be related to two components of the placebo reaction. The
first is anticipation (usually optimistic) of results because drugs are
expected to work; it can be called "suggestibility,"
"faith," or "hope." The second is spontaneous change, which
is at times even more important. A placebo may be credited for spontaneous
improvement or blamed for spontaneous deterioration or an entirely new problem
(eg, headache, rash) (Berkow and Beers, 1999:2586.) In studies, effects of placebo must be
subtracted from those of the active drug. The active drug must perform
significantly better than the placebo to demonstrate efficacy. (Berkow and Beers,
1999:2586.)
Related homeopathic research:
Sengpiehl (1994) evaluated the reaction of homoeopathic Luffa Operculata
4X and a combination of Kalium Bichromium 5CH and Cinnabaris 5CH.
40 patients were randomly selected and divided into 2 experimental
groups. The study was carried over a period of four months. One group received
Luffa 4X and the other group a combination
of Kalium Bichromium 5CH and Cinnabaris 5CH. The statistical results
form questionnaires were analysed using
Mann-Whitney U test and Wilcoxon Signed Rank test. The Mann-Whitney U test
results showed values of p = 0.033 and p = 0.31 within each group. The
conclusion was that Luffa Operculata was a more effective mode of treatment for
chronic sinusitis than a combination
of Kalium Bichromium and Cinnabaris. (Sengpiehl, 1994.)
However, it is difficult to assess the validity of these results,
because, there was no placebo control group in this study. Smit (2002)
conducted a study to determine the efficacy of a homoeopathic simillimum in the
symptomatic treatment of chronic sinusitis over a period of 8 weeks. 15
patients were selected, diagnosed with chronic sinusitis by a medical doctor
via case history taking and
an endoscopic examination. Data collected from evaluation forms
completed by participants and objective medical assessment was statistically
analysed using Wilcoxon Signed Rank test.
The results indicated a highly significant improvement in all the
determinants measured (primary, associated ,and secondary symptoms of
sinusitis, mood, vitality, and medical improvement).
The validity of these results is difficult to assess, because there was
no placebo control group in this study and the sample size was very small.
Fleming (2001) investigated the efficacy of Hydrastis Canadensis Ř and
3X potency in the treatment of sinusitis. This double blind placebo controlled
study was carried over a 3 week period.
45 patients between the ages of 13 and 50 years with pre-diagnosed
sinusitis were randomly selected into three groups . The control group received
placebo. One experimental group received Hydrastis canadensis Ř and the one
experimental group received Hydrastis canadensis 3X.
The data from questionnaires was analysed using Wilcoxon-Rank-Sum test,
Kruskal-Wallis test, Mann-Whitney U test and goodness-of-fit tests.
There was a generally observed reduction in symptom severity for all 3
groups between days 1 and 11 of the study.
Hydrastis Canadensis 3X group showed a symptom severity reduction
between days 11 and 21. There was however no significant difference between the
three groups. It was concluded that neither Hydrastis Canadensis Ř nor
Hydrastis Canadensis 3X was effective in the treatment of sinusitis.
Two other studies on homoeopathic treatment of sinusitis were conducted
at the same time as this study, using the same protocol and methodology.
Ismail (2003) investigated the efficacy of homoeopathic simillimum in
the treatment of chronic sinusitis. This double blind placebo controlled study
was conducted over a three-week period.
30 participants were selected for this study and were divided into two
experimental groups „“ simillimum and placebo group. The data collected from
questionnaires was statistically analysed using
a one-sample t-test and Mann-Whitney U test.
The one-sample t-test results showed that both treatment groups showed a
statistically significant improvement , however the Mann-Whitney U test results
showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the two
groups. Therefore the simillimum treatment was found to be as significant as
the placebo group. It was concluded that simillimum treatment was not effective
in the treatment of chronic sinusitis.
Ebrahim (2003) investigated the efficacy of a homoeopathic complex
(Hydrastis Canadensis 9CH, Kalium Bichromium 9CH and Sambucus nigra 9CH) in the
treatment of chronic sinusitis over a period of three weeks.
This was a double blind placebo controlled study. Thirty participants
were selected for this study and were divided into two groups, one receiving
complex treatment and the other receiving placebo. Data collected from
questionnaires was statistically analysed using one-sample t-test and
Mann-Whitney U test.
The one-sample t-test results showed that both treatment groups showed a
statistically significant improvement. Mann-Whitney U test results showed that
there was no significant difference between the two groups.
Therefore the complex treatment was found to be as significant as the
placebo group. It was concluded that homoeopathic complex treatment was not
effective in the treatment of chronic sinusitis.
The purpose of this double blind placebo controlled study was to
evaluate the efficacy of the main miasmatic nosodes in the treatment of chronic
sinusitis in terms of the patients perception of the treatment.
30 volunteering participants were selected according to inclusion and
exclusion criteria for this double blind study. 15 participants were randomly
assigned to the nosode treatment group and 15 participants were randomly
assigned to the placebo group.
Patient number Nosode precribed
Dispensed Placebo
1 CARCINOSINUM
200 CH X
2 CARCINOSINUM 30 CH X
3 CARCINOSINUM 30 CH X
4 TUBERCULINUM 30 CH X
5 CARCINOSINUM 1 M X
6 MEDORRHINUM 30 CH X
7 SYPHILLINUM
30 CH X
8 CARCINOSINUM 1M X
9 TUBERCULINUM 200 CH X
10 CARCINOSINUM 30 CH X
11 MEDORRHINUM 30 CH X
12 TUBERCULINUM 200 CH X
13 CARCINOSINUM
200 CH X
14 CARCINOSINUM 200 CH X
15 CARCINOSINUM 30 CH X
16 TUBERCULINUM 30 CH X
17 MEDORRHINUM 30 CH X
18 CARCINOSINUM 200 CH X
19 MEDORRHINUM 30 CH X
20 CARCINOSINUM 30 CH X
21 MEDORRHINUM 30 CH X
22 MEDORRHINUM 30 CH X
23 CARCINOSINUM 200 CH X
24 CARCINOSINUM 30 CH X
25 CARCINOSINUM 200 CH X
26 CARCINOSINUM 30 CH X
27 MEDORRHINUM 30 CH X
28 CARCINOSINUM 30 CH X
29 CARCINOSINUM 200 CH X
30 CARCINOSINUM
30 CH X
The table above shows that there were an equal number of participants in
each group that were allocated with either a nosode or a placebo according to
the randomisation list. The most common nosode prescribed was Carcinosinum (18
participants). The most common nosode dispensed was also Carcinosinum (10
participants).
Only three nosodes were indicated for participants in this study. 10
participants received the cancer nosode (Carcinosinum), 2 participants received
the tubercular nosode (Tuberculinum), and 3 participants received the sycotic nosode
(Medorrhinum).
8 participants that received Carcinosinum had complained of a history of
headaches during the first consultation before treatment. All these
participants reported that they were headache-free during the 3-week treatment
Compared to other related research studies, Sengpiehl (1994) and Smit (2002)
conducted their studies over a four-month and two-month period respectively.
However, both studies were not placebo controlled. Their results showed a
significant improvement in sinusitis symptoms. This could have been due to a
longer observation treatment period, but it is difficult to assess the validity
of these results, because there was no placebo group.
Like this study, Fleming (2001), Ismail (2003) and Ebrahim (2003)
conducted double blind placebo controlled studies over a period of three weeks.
Their results showed a significant improvement in each mode of treatment
investigated. However, there was no statistical significance when compared to
the placebo groups.
The outcome of these studies could have been due to the similar
weaknesses as the ones mentioned above for the miasmatic nosodes, such as, the
short treatment period. There was a placebo effect
in these studies which could have been due??
In addition, the use of subjective outcome measures only may have been
insufficient to adequately evaluate the effectiveness of miasmatic nosode
treatment of chronic sinusitis. In future, objective clinical evaluation should
be included in any similar study.
Based on the results of this study one must conclude that the main
miasmatic nosodes are not effective in the treatment of chronic sinusitis.
[Nomthandazo Dlamini]
Department of Homoeopathy, Durban Institute of Technology.
APHENDIKSI A
INCWADI YEMINININGWANE EBALULEKILE
ISIHLOKO SOCWANINGO PHROJEKTHI: Ukubaluleka kwamanosodi
asemqoka ekwelapheni isifo se khronikhi sanusaythisi.
IGAMA LOMPHATHI HLELO: Dokotela Richard Steele
IGAMA LESEKELA LOMPHATHI: Dokotela Corne Hall
IGAMA LOMCWANINGI: Nomthandazo Dlamini
ABANYE ABACWANINGI: Shaida Ismail, Shera Ebrahim
Usuku:
Sawubona
Siyabonga ngokuzinika isikhathi kanye nentshisekelo yakho ekufundeni
lencwadi. Ngosizo lwakho, ukubaluleka kwe Homoeopathy ekwelapheni i chronic
sinusitis kungacwaningwa.
Ngingumfundi owenza ihomoeopathy e Durban Institute of Technology. Ukuze
ngigogode kulomkhakha, kumele ngenze ucwaningo. Lolu wuhlelo olusemthethweni
oluzoletha ulwazi mayelana nokubaluleka kwe
Homoeopathy ekwehliseni izinga lezimpawu ze chonic sinusitis. Ukuze
lokhu kufezeke, uyacelwa ukuba uzimbandakanye kuloluhlelo lwamahhala mayelana
nokusixoxela ngesifo sakho sechronic sinusitis, nanokuba
sikuphatha kanjani empilweni yakho.
Lolucwaningo phrojekthi luzobe lusingathwe ngu Dokotela oyi homoeopath
orejistiwe kuwo lomnyango. Lonke ulwazi ongahle usonike lona kulolucwaningo,
luzogcinwa luyimfihlo yakho kanye nomcwaningi kuphela.
Uma uzozimbandakanya kuloluhlelo kumele ube ngumuntu onalokhu
okulandelayo:
a) ube neminyaka ephakathi kweyishumi nesishiyagalombili kuya kwiminyaka
engamashumini ayisithupha nanhlanu.
b) kumele ube ukade uphethwe yilesifo esikhathini esingamasonto amane
elandelana,
c) kumele ube ngumuntu obengathathi muthi wokwelapha isinusitis
esikhathini esingangesonto ngaphambi kokuzimbandakanya kulolucwaningo.
d) Kumele ube ngumuntu okwaziyo ukufunda kanye nokubhala.
Labo abanalokhu okulandelayo bazohoxiswa kuloluhlelo:
a) abesifazane abakhulelwe
b) labo abanesifo esiqondene nesifuba njege asma.
c) Kusukela luqala loluhlelo, awuvumelekile ukuthatha olunye uhlobo
lomuthi wokwelapha, ngaphandle kwaleyo yezifo ezibucayi ezinjengesofo
sikashukela, isifo esiphathelene nenhliziyo kanye nakholesteroli.
d) Labo abangazwani nemikhiqizo yobisi, ilakthozi.
Uma usuyifezile lemigomo ebhaliwe futhi uzimisele ngokubandakanyeka,
usungaba kuloluhlelo oluzothatha amasonto amathathu, lapho umcwaningi edinga
ukuba akubone ezikhathini ezimbili lapho kudingeke ukuba
ugcwalise ifomu yemibuzo ephathelene nesimo sempilo yakho kanye neye
sanusaythisi.
Leli fomu lizobe libhalwe ngolimi lwesiZulu nesi Ngisi . Yonke
imininingwane ezobe igcwaliswe kulelifomu izobe iyimfihlo.
Loluhlelo lusingathwa umthetho owenza ukuba umcwaningi, nomphathi hlelo,
bangazi ukuba yilowo nalowo muntu welashwa ngaluphi uhlobo lomuthi wokwelapha
phecelezi I“ťdouble blind placebo control study“.
Abantu abazimbandakanyayo kuloluhlelo, bazocazwa kumaqembu amabili
okwelashwa (phecelezi i plasibo noma i thrithmenti) ngendlela
engabandlululi.Umuntu ngamunye usethubeni elingamaphesenti angu 25
okuba kwiqembu elibizwa nge plasibo kanye nethuba elingamaphesenti angu
75 lokuba kwiqembu le thrithmenti. Yonke imithi yokwelapha izobe itholakala
ngendlela efanayo kulamaqembu womabili ngendlela
yesihomoeopathi.
Amavolontiya angu 15 azofakwa kwiqembu lethrithmenti, kanti amavolovtiya
angu 5 azofakwa kwiqembu leplasibo. Labo abazobe bekwiqembu leplasibo
bayokwaziswa ekupheleni kohlelo, futhi bayonikwa ithuba
lokwelashwa uma seluphelile lolucwaningo.
Uyaziswa ukuba ukuzimbandakanya kwakho kuloluhlelo lwamahhala
kungukuvolontiya, futhi wamukelekile ukuba uhoxe kuloluhlelo noma yinini,
nangaphandle kokusinika isizathu. Ukuzimbandakanya kwakho kulolu hlelo
akuzuba nomphumela olimazanayo, kepha ungazizwa ungekho esimweni
esejwayelekile ezinsukwini zokuqala esikuthatha njengophawu olujwayelekile uma
welashwa ngokwesihomoeopathi.
Uma unemibuzo noma ungacaciselwa ngokweneliskile, ungathintana nalaba
abalandelayo kulezinombolo:
Nomthandazo Dlamini - 0825335369
Dokotela Steele- 2042041
Siyabonga ngosizo lwakho.
Umnyango wakwa homoeopathy e Durban Institute of Technology
Vorwort/Suchen. Zeichen/Abkürzungen. Impressum.