Theorie
Repertorisieren
[Elaine Lewis]
Characteristic Symptoms
The
symptom is BIZARRE. It’s WEIRD. It makes you turn around and say, “Huh? What
did you just say? Could you repeat that please?” Also, a symptom that’s RECENT
is characteristic.
A recent symptom is very reliable, it hasn’t had a chance to be corrupted
by time, drugs, bad habits and so on. You know that Hering’s Law says that
healing takes place in reverse order, right?
So the most recent symptom in a case will be the first to go, so
matching that symptom is essential.
The
symptom is PECULIAR or strange in the disease. For example, it’s normal to have
thirst during a fever, we wouldn’t pay any attention to that. But if a person
had no thirst…that would
be very characteristic and we would surely want to look up “thirstless
during fever”.
The
symptom is normal but EXCESSIVE. What if a person had thirst during fever but
he was pouring glass after glass of water and never feeling satisfied; we would
surely have to look up “thirst with fever”.
Symptoms
that you’d expect to be there but aren’t there; or they’re there only in the
smallest way. Let’s say a person has a very bad sore throat by all appearances
but reports no or very little pain! That would really be strange! And what
remedy has that? “Painless sore throat”: Baptisia.
The
symptom is a keynote of a remedy! Robin Murphy always says, “If you see a
keynote of a remedy, give the remedy!” That means the example in #3 should be
given Phosphorus right away without a moment’s hesitation.
The
symptom is characteristic by its concomitant. What does that mean? You might
have a common symptom, such as vomiting in a stomach flu, there wouldn’t be
much we could do with a symptom like that; but, if the patient had diarrhea at
the same time? A concomitant diarrhea? That would be very peculiar; we would
surely repertorize that! The rubric is “Stomach: vomiting, diarrhea, during”
and the two main remedies are Ars. and Verat.
Two
symptoms alternate: as one goes away, the other one comes back.
Sensation,
location and modalities! A symptom means nothing to us without its sensation,
location and modalities! You can’t even find it in the Repertory if you don’t
know these things!
We saw in “Repertory Round-Up part 3”, the Vertigo case, the patient
said she had a headache on her vertex (top of her head) but we couldn’t do
anything with that symptom because it’s not
in the Headache chapter! That’s because the sensation is listed first
and the location second! So you would have to look it up as “aching pain, vertex”
or “shooting pain, vertex”. We didn’t have
any sensation information. And as for modalities–the factors that make
the complaint better or worse, including the time of day or night–you might
have a very common symptom in your case;
by all rights, a useless symptom; but, attach a modality to it, and you
might be down to just a few remedies! For example, “Cough: coughing agg.” That
means that instead of feeling temporarily
> after coughing, as is usually the case, coughing makes the cough
worse! There are only 12 remedies in that rubric, and only 4 that are either in
bold or italics. So, you add a modality to a symptom and suddenly you’re down
to just a few remedies; that’s how important modalities are!
MENTALS
/ EMOTIONALS We all know how important they are, I don’t have to tell you. BUT!
They have to be peculiar! If they make sense, they’re not symptoms! If I say,
“I hurt my
knee and now I’m depressed,” is that a symptom? We’d all be depressed if
that happened to us! And another thing, you really have to use your powers of
discernment when a patient is talking
to you. He might say, “I don’t want any company, I want to be alone.” That
sounds like a really good symptom, doesn’t it? “Company aggravates” or
“aversion to company”. But is that really true? Find out! In the vertigo case
we mentioned, the patient was aggravated by the company that was THERE–namely,
her kids!!!! That’s why she wanted to be alone, because her kids were not
helpful! So what seemed like a great symptom was actually not a symptom at all!
ETIOLOGY!
The famous etiology I’m always talking about! It’s expressed as “ailments from”
in our Repertory. Etiology is at the top of the hierarchy of symptoms. And
since I brought that up, this would be a good time to segue into Part-B of our
discussion, namely…
The Hierarchy Of Symptoms
Etiology
(“Ailments From” or “Never Well Since” a certain trauma, event or illness)
Diagnosis
(the name of the condition):
We have to know what disease or condition you have so we can go to that
rubric and see which of the remedies there have the characteristic symptoms of
our case. Measles? Heart disease? PMS? Arthritis? Gallstones? Kidney stones? Ovarian
cyst? A stomach virus? Some of you are going to say, “Isn’t this allopathy?” If
I don’t know what you have, I could be giving you a measles remedy for poison
ivy! You know, that’s the thing about symptoms, they cover a lot of diseases,
and you can’t seriously think that you get the same remedy regardless of what
the diagnosis is! Really? Think about that! Take a symptom like diarrhea, so
many illnesses have it: Food poisoning, Crohns Disease, Stage fright…do they
all get Ars.? The food poisoning patient might need Ars., but the stage fright
patient might need Gels., the Crohns Disease patient might need Nit-ac. and so
on; so, knowing the symptom isn’t enough, we have to know what’s wrong with
you!
Sudden
Onset
A sudden onset might trump everything in the case and lead to an
immediate consideration of Aconite or Belladonna and maybe even Baptisia in
septic states.
Delusions
and Strange/Rare and Peculiar symptoms including the most recent symptom in the
case.
Mentals
(symptoms like confusion, forgetfulness, poor concentration, stupor.)
Emotionals
(fear, crying, yelling, whining, making unreasonable demands, throwing things,
etc.)
Physical
Generals–symptoms that start with the word “I” (“I’m thirsty”, “I’m cold”, “I
want to sleep”, “I’m nauseous”, “I want ice”, “I want the lights out”, etc.)
Local
symptoms–symptoms that start with the word “my” (“My leg hurts”, “My eye
itches”, “My throat is sore”, “My nose is stopped up,” “My feet are cold”.)
Now, to help us out, let’s look to this month’s Quiz Answer as an
example: “Revisiting: A Mrs. Rosie O’Donnell From Fort Lynn, NJ writes…”. As
you may remember, Rosie had a very complicated case; she seemed to have a
million things wrong with her! My quiz respondents dutifully repertorized all
of Rosie’s symptoms, giving equal weight to the local symptoms and the
strange/rare/peculiars, etc. The “cold feet” Rosie complained of, and her
hang-nails got the same value as her most recent symptoms: aversion to cheese
and her day-long crying spell–which was just “weird” in my opinion.
Checking with our hierarchy of symptoms, was there an aetiology in this
case? No. Was there a diagnosis? No. Was there Sudden Onset? No. Strange/Rare
and Peculiar? Yes!!!! Two things:
A newly acquired aversion to cheese and a desire to cry for no reason.
So now, I want you to picture the Hierarchy of Symptoms as a chest of
drawers and imagine that each drawer is labelled.
The top drawer says “Aetiology”, the 2nd drawer says Diagnosis, the 3rd
drawer says Sudden Onset, the 4th drawer says Delusions and
Strange/Rare/Peculiar, and so on. Now, pay close attention. What happens when
you pull open the top drawer and look inside? ALL THE OTHER DRAWERS DISAPPEAR!
[Joy Lucas]
Case taking is all about extracting symptoms and symptoms have to have a
quality to them and be the FACTS of the case. The aim is to get a minimum
number of symptoms with the maximum importance and relevance to the case. Not
so few that they become too exclusive but not so many as to be confusing - I
like to aim for a maximum of 10.
Confining yourself to:-
Location
Sensation
Extension
Modalities
Causation
Concomitants
should suffice for all cases.
Taking the totality of the case doesn¹t mean including every single
detail of the person¹s life, it merely means the totality of the signs and
symptoms pertaining to the diseased state.
Sometimes this will include a fusion or borderline states between what
is healthy and what is diseased - what some call constitutional prescribing.
Although being able to rank symptoms properly hasn’t much to do with how to
take a case, it is still relevant to say that the case taking has to be good so
that the case analysis can be good and case analysis has to include the ranking
of symptoms.
There are various methods of doing this but separating symptoms into the
following categories is extremely valuable and practical. Some homeopaths
create graphs, or columns, or shapes for these symptoms, some do it in their
heads:
1) Physical Generals - if the case has physical symptoms and they are
part of the presenting complaint then these are very important in my opinion
and often not given enough consideration.
2) Mental and Emotional Generals - if these are strong and dominate a
case then obviously they are important but emotional symptoms often present an
extremely grey area for some prescribers.
3) Particulars are the symptoms that are important to the client, those
that are prefixed by “My…”. These symptoms can be very meaningful because the
client will be relating to them intimately and are often the symptoms they will
talk most about. I place a lot of emphasis on these symptoms because of this
and they often lead you into the inner sanctum of a case, where all the
intriguing symptoms are.
4) Strange, rare and peculiar (most important symptoms of all).
Striking, uncommon and peculiar symptoms can appear absolutely anywhere within
the case. It might be the modalities of a case, the sensations, the location
(if not generalised but specific). They can be cravings or aversions, dreams or
fears.
They might appear as seemingly small symptoms but nonetheless
significant. For example, a burning sensation which is >>> heat; a dry
mouth that has no thirst; nausea which is NOT >>> for vomiting; a
fever that has no thirst, etc. Likewise, a single characteristic symptom can
dominate a case to such a degree it virtually leads the case easily to the
simillimum. For example, hands covered in warts; cold hands # cold feet; a pain
in the heart only in the late afternoon; a weakness of memory for dates only,
etc.
How you recognise these strange symptoms is largely common sense because
their oddity factor should shine through but you can’t always depend on the
client offering all this on a plate - you have to ask questions and follow
through on all information offered.
Unfortunately, what sometimes happens, is that the prescriber turns a
relatively ordinary symptom into a strange one, giving it the wrong ranking and
letting it define a case so it is necessary that one learns how to see the 3
main dimensions to a symptom:
The degree of peculiarity
The location in the hierarchy of the organism
The intensity of the symptom as expressed by the client.
5) General and undefined symptoms or
vague and indefinite symptoms should not be included directly in the case but
put to one side. These types of symptoms might be
indications of a deeper layer or
less active miasmatic influence, they might also be meaningless, they might
even be the symptoms which develop after the first prescription which
in turn will shed light on the case,
but initially they should be left to one side.
6) Confusing symptoms, due to drugs, poorly elicited because of the
client¹s state, damaged by previous remedies or suppression in some way should
also be put to one side.
7) Symptoms that are common to any specific disease diagnosis also need
to be put into a context. If such a common symptom exists but it completely
dominates a case then this symptom gains importance, e.g. the debilitating and
aching bones throughout the body that one often experiences with ‘flu, or
flaking skin in an eczema case - common enough but if it dominates then it is
important.
As you proceed through a case the client will either spontaneously offer
information or will answer through pertinent questions. Either way there will
be a natural intensity to all symptoms within a case and you need to find a way
of grading these symptoms as you go through the case. Some use an underlining
system, others a numerical system - thus:-
4 underlines = volunteered information which has intensity and emphasis
3 underlines = the perception of the client of their own condition
2 underlines = volunteered information but that which doesn’t have so
much intensity or emphasis
1 underline = information that is even more vague but still distinct
enough to be called a symptom
No underlines = vague information probably from direct questioning -
“sometimes”, “I don’t really know”, too far back in the past and not relevant
now, etc etc. If you ask someone if they are scared of spiders and they have to
think about it but finally say “yes”, forget it, you just cannot include
information like that.
I tend to think that the presenting complaint of any case is a metaphor
for the whole case and thus I place a lot of importance on the presenting
complaint - it represents the facts of the case, the point at which the client
has come to see you, it is the point of no return. It is here you find the most
vital symptom that have the highest ranking and that relate outwards towards
the rest of the case but the further outwards you go the lower the ranking gets
for most symptom.
Always be guided by what needs to be cured.
Excerpt from a Forum:
hi elaine,
[I'm] not finding the same remedy in all the rubrics. seems like this
must happen a lot when assembling a case? or does this happen in only the
“difficult” cases?
You’ve asked a profound question. This is why homeopathy is so
difficult!
We say we take the totality of symptoms, but as you’ve pointed out, if
you go to the Repertory (our main reference book) and look for the symptoms in
the case, you rarely find that there is one remedy shared by all.
For example, if you have a runny nose and sore throat that extends to
the ear, with amelioration (improvement) from thunder and lightning storms, you
may see that you can’t find a single remedy that covers the whole case. So,
how, under the circumstances, does one pick a remedy? It seems to suggest that
you have to disregard some of the symptoms as being “irrelevant” and that’s
exactly what you have to do!
The symptom with the most value in this particular case is “Thunder and
Lightning ameliorate”! Why? It’s because it’s so unusual! It’s so peculiar!
Here’s a person who’s sick with a cold and feels better in a storm! It’s weird!
It doesn’t occur to the average person that we all have colds
differently! And it’s how we’re different, in homeopathy, that leads to the
correct remedy.
Think of it as looking into a microscope to identify the kind of
bacteria present, the only ones you can see are out on the fringe-they’re
waving a big red flag, “Look at me! Look at me!” The others are all huddled in
a ball, so, you’re looking out on the fringe where you can see! The only thing
I “see” in this case is someone whose symptoms go away in a storm! Everything else
is like everyone else’s cold! Indistinguishable!
This is how homeopathy works-it’s the peculiar symptom, it’s the
striking symptom that you can’t ignore, which seems to have nothing to do with
the complaint, that makes it so you can find a remedy. So, in this case, you’d
check the Repertory for “Environment: > thunderstorms.” (Murphy’s Repertory)
and there’s only about 4 remedies, and then you’d check to see which of the 4
most closely fits your case.
Here’s the problem with the Repertory:
1.
Some
remedies were very extensively “proven” -tested on volunteers- and have
hundreds of years of clinical use, and are, consequently, over-represented.
Remedies like
2.
Other
remedies are “under-proven”, under-used, and are poorly represented in the
Repertory and will never “win” in a strict repertorization.
3.
There
are numerous symptoms in the Materia Medica (our other “Big Book”) that were
never entered into the Repertory! For instance, the remedy Chocolate isn’t in
the rubric “Abandons/Forsakes His Own Children”, and clearly it should be
there. (Simillimum, summer 2003, p. 48)
So we can see that we have to have some other strategies going for us
other than strict repertorization when solving a case.
What might those strategies be? Well, different homeopaths have lots of
tricks up their sleeves, but here’s a few I think we would all agree upon:
1.
The
most recent symptom takes precedence. The most recent symptom in a case can’t
be ignored in favor of the ones we find more interesting. It might be that
before you can get to the heart of the case, a recent “boring” symptom may
block your way if you don’t knock it off first! For instance, a patient who’s
had arthritis for years and has just fallen and bumped his head, needs Arnica
-our injury remedy- even though the arthritis has been around longer and
represents a deeper problem.
2.
SUFFERING
in the case takes precedence. If someone has pain, you have to take the case of
the pain, even though you may suspect that your patient is constitutionally a
3.
Find
the worst thing! When there seems to be a million symptoms in the case, and there
usually are, ask your patient, “What’s the worst thing that’s the matter with
you? What symptom do you want to go away first?” Then take the case of whatever
that is. He may say, “If I didn’t have insomnia, a lot of my other problems
would go away.” So, the case then becomes one of insomnia-you’d ask him to
describe it, what does he think about while lying awake, does he wake at a
certain time each night, what may have caused it, and so on.
4.
Look
for what’s excessive in the case: Too much talking, too much sweating, too much
dryness, too much…whatever.
5. Find
the over-sensitivity: Look to see what the person is overly sensitive to:
Criticism? Rainy weather? Music? Sunlight?
6.
The
patient’s response to stress - is there a pattern? You may find that this is a
person who cries about everything, or over-reacts violently to everything, or
feels that he can’t ask for help, despite having these stresses in his life.
The RESPONSE to stress is more significant than having a stress, per se.
7.
The
cause. Very often if we know the cause, we can pack up our bags and go home!
The cause determines many or possibly even most of our prescriptions! “You’ve
had this since the accident? Oh, why didn’t you say so?
8.
The
remedy’s Arnica!” “You had this since your boyfriend broke up with you? Why
didn’t you say so! The remedy’s Nat-m.” “You’ve had this since the flu? Why
didn’t you say so? The remedy’s Gels.!” (I’m over-simplifying to make a point.)
In general, when confronted with symptoms which don’t fall neatly under
the umbrella of one remedy, THROW OUT THE COMMON SYMPTOMS right away-symptoms
like “Depression”, “Headache”, “Runny Nose”-symptoms which could be any one of
500 remedies, forget about them!
THROW OUT EVERYTHING THAT’S NOT INTENSE.
Look for what’s PECULIAR.
Look at what’s RECENT.
Look for SUFFERING.
Look at what’s STRIKING.
Look for a THEME (always crying, always talking about birds, etc.)
Ask what’s the WORST THING in the case (generally, pathology on the MENTAL/EMOTIONAL
plane, if intense, tends to be the worst thing-fears and delusions, for
example, can cripple a person < than a broken leg).
Look at how the person RESPONDS to his complaint.
Find out what he’s HYPERSENSITIVE to.
Look to see what he’s doing OVER AND OVER again; look to see what he’s
SAYING over and over again.
See if you can separate the symptoms into acute and chronic and treat
acutes first.
Look for the CAUSE.
In the final analysis, instead of 20 symptoms in the case, you may find
that you’re down to 4 or 5!
So, for example, in a Chocolate case, regardless of the
diagnosis-arthritis, or menstrual cramps, etc.-the rubrics or symptoms you
might finally decide upon may look like this:
Desires chocolate (theme, over and over again, excessive)
> in the countryside (unusual in that most people don’t need to be in
the country to feel better)
> by curling up in a ball (response to the complaint, odd, striking)
< by the presence of her children (overly sensitive to her children,
odd, striking)
Desires to travel/escape (response to the complaint)
(These really are Chocolate symptoms, I’m not making this up!)
So, it’s what’s unusual in the case, it’s what’s excessive, it’s the
response, it’s what’s repetitive, it’s what’s striking and remember to treat
the suffering first and look for etiologies (causes).
If there are “layers” in a case, each layer will begin with a CAUSE, an
event, which will shift a person over to a new remedy picture-or, it might take
him deeper into his own constitutional state;
For example, there’s the Healthy Sulphur who’s ambitious, pursuing a
career, getting good grades, warm, loves the outdoors, extroverted, active,
etc.;
The very sick Sulphur, who’s become a recluse, stays indoors, is chilly,
and has become lazy and has stopped trying. A healthy
Try to see what the critical “events” in the person’s life were. There
are a set of remedies that correspond to each event-remedies for the flu,
remedies for loss of a loved one, remedies for injury, remedies for business
failure, etc.
If you see that a person has never been the same since a significant
event, the symptoms themselves become less significant and the CAUSE becomes
paramount, and you would want to try to match a remedy in the CAUSAL rubric to
your case.
“Unable-to-sit-through-a-rambling-explanation”. I’m thinking Sulphur!
[Massimo Mangialavori]
In meine Sprechstunde kommt Altero, 36 Jahre, ein Mann von kräftigem Körperbau, aber dennoch agil. Man kann sich leicht vorstellen, dass er früher Sportarten betrieb, die viele Körperübungen zum Aufbau von Muskelmasse erfordern. Gleichwohl bewegt er sich leicht und geschmeidig. Er ist dezent und zugleich sehr vornehm gekleidet.
Er trägt einen wunderschönen Kaschmirpullover, Designerhosen und -schuhe, und sogar seine Unterwäsche ist von sehr teurer Marke. Sein stark gerötetes Gesicht, dessen Farbe sprechend noch intensiver wird, verrät eine gewisse Aufregung, die Altero wohl lieber vor mir verbergen würde.
Zunächst redet er sehr förmlich, wohl um zu zeigen wie gebildet er ist. Doch als ich versuche, Themen anzusprechen, die ihn vermutlich innerlich mehr bewegen, beginnt Altero zu murmeln, dann über seine Worte zu stolpern und schließlich gar zu stottern.
Abgesehen von seiner Art zu sprechen, scheint es klar zu sein, dass Altero sich als eine selbstbewusste, kompetente Person darstellen möchte, die vielseitig interessiert ist. Aber sein Wissen auf all diesen unterschiedlichen Gebieten, das er so geschickt zur Schau stellt, scheint nicht sehr tief zu sein.
Altero hat etliche dunkle Flecken nahezu über seinen ganzen Oberkörper verteilt, für die er sich schämt und die er nicht erwähnt, bis ich ihn untersuche. Dann gibt er zu, dass er seit vielen Jahren unter Mykosen leidet, was er als Makel in seiner Erscheinung empfindet.
Altero sagt: „Ich habe Netzhautblutungen aufgrund einer starken Kurzsichtigkeit. Mehrere Leute empfahlen mir, hierher zu kommen, nachdem ich die Topspezialisten auf diesem Gebiet aufgesucht hatte… Sie seien der Beste, nicht nur in Italien. Seit kurzem ist es sehr viel schlimmer geworden und angeblich kann man nichts dagegen machen. Wenn mein Auge anfängt zu bluten, soll ich einfach abwarten, bis es wieder absorbiert ist…“
Wann fingen diese Blutungen an?
„Vor vier Jahren trat es zum ersten Mal auf. Es beginnt immer mit einem schwarzen Fleck in meinem Blickfeld und ich kann dann in dem Bereich nicht gut sehen.
Welches Auge ist betroffen?
„Die letzten Male war es hauptsächlich das rechte Auge.“
Wie lange dauert es an?
„Es dauert zwei bis drei Monate, bis man nichts mehr davon merkt und sieht und bis das Blut wieder vollständig absorbiert ist.“
Wie ist es dann mit Ihrem Sehen?
„Wenn es sehr hell ist, erscheinen die Dinge verzerrt… Bei Dämmerlicht sehe ich einen schwarzen Schein und ich kann überhaupt nichts sehen an dieser bestimmten Stelle…“ [nur nach den Blutungen]
Was hat Sie bewegt, zu mir zu kommen? Sie haben das ja schon länger...
„Anfangs machte ich mir nur wenig Sorgen, doch inzwischen bin ich extrem beunruhigt, denn jetzt tauchen sie in allen möglichen Situationen auf. Aber es scheint keinen besonderen Grund dafür zu geben und niemand hat mir gesagt, ob es etwas gibt was ich tun oder lassen sollte… Sie können während des Schlafs auftreten, oder während des Lernens oder während der Arbeit… Ich kann mich in keinerlei Weise dagegen schützen… Es gibt keine Ursache und keinen speziellen Zusammenhang mit irgendetwas. Ich bin ziemlich verzweifelt, wenn es wieder anfängt zu bluten… Ich habe Angst, es könnte doch auf lange Sicht Schaden anrichten.“
Hatten Sie immer schon Probleme mit Ihren Augen?
„Mit drei Jahren begann meine Kurzsichtigkeit, es war schon ziemlich fortgeschritten… ich musste die Seiten beim Lesen sehr dicht vor die Augen halten.“
Ist das immer noch so?
„In den letzten Jahren ist es sehr viel schlimmer geworden. In den letzten zehn Jahren habe ich Kontaktlinsen getragen und kann auch gut damit sehen. Meine Sehkraft scheint sich zu stabilisieren. Aber mir wurde gesagt, dass das viele Lesen die Situation noch verschlimmern könnte…“
Kam das mit den Netzhautblutungen sehr plötzlich oder...
„Ich glaube, es war ein schleichender Prozess… Vielleicht deutlicher spürbar während der Pubertät, aber damals habe ich wohl zu viel Hochleistungssport betrieben.
Ich praktizierte verschiedene Arten des Ringens, angefangen von Freistil über griechisch-römisches Ringen und dann Judo. Die anderen Kampfsportarten interessierten mich nicht so sehr, weil es nicht so viel körperlichen Kontakt gibt… Und ich mag es, den Schweiß meines Gegners zu riechen… Es stößt mich ab und erregt mich gleichzeitig, so als wäre ich ein Tier. Aber ich will den Faden nicht verlieren… Mir scheint, ich kann nachts nicht gut sehen… Ich traue mich nicht nachts Auto zu fahren und empfinde entgegenkommende Scheinwerfer sehr störend. Sie blenden mich… Ich trage gerne eine Sonnenbrille… sogar nachts. Ich trage eine Sonnenbrille wie Aristoteles Onassis und fühle mich damit viel besser, wie mit einer Maske. Schließlich kann ich Ihnen auch erzählen, dass ich eine leichte Lähmung des Gesichtsnervs hatte, das begann ebenfalls in meiner Jugend. Man behauptete, es sei durch eine Erkältung entstanden, doch das glaube ich nicht. Einige Ärzte können nicht über die eigene Nasenspitze hinaussehen. Die eine Gesichtshälfte war völlig in Ordnung, und wenn man meinen Kopf im Profil sah, konnte man nichts erkennen…
Es gab da einen unangenehmen Zeitpunkt, als ich aufhörte, in ein bestimmtes Fitnessstudio zu gehen…
Einige Jahre zuvor war mein Trainer gestorben und ich ging eine äußerst enge Verbindung mit seinem Assistenten ein. Aber wir begannen sehr stark miteinander zu konkurrieren, und schließlich musste ich mich von ihm trennen…
Etwa zur gleichen Zeit verließ mich meine damalige Freundin und begann mit ihm auszugehen, und das war’s dann …
Ich zog mir eine Erkältung zu, als ich im Winter ohne Helm Motorrad fuhr…
Aber ich habe das x-mal in meinem Leben gemacht, davor und danach und jetzt, und nie ist etwas passiert.“
Was geschah dann?
„Als ich zuhause ankam, war mein Gesicht verzerrt und ich konnte nicht einmal mehr mein rechtes Auge bewegen…“
Was taten Sie dann?
„Ich blieb zuhause bis alles wieder vollkommen in Ordnung war… Es dauerte Monate und ich brauchte sehr viel Kortison. Jahrelang hatte ich Schmerzen im Kiefergelenk, bis ein Zahnarzt es behandelte, angeblich gäbe es keinen Zusammenhang, aber das glaube ich nicht … Denn zuvor hatte ich nie Probleme damit gehabt… In kritischen Situationen hielt ich meinen Mund geschlossen.“
An diesem Punkt wollte Altero offensichtlich gerne das Thema wechseln.
„Ich habe ein strukturelles Problem und wüsste gerne, ob die Homöopathie mir dabei helfen kann. Seit fünf Jahren ist mein diastolischer Blutdruck zu hoch. Das hatte ich vorher nie, aber meine Cholesterin- und Triglyceridwerte waren immer schon ein bisschen zu hoch. Ich bin um meinen Blutdruck besorgt… der diastolische Wert ist stark gestiegen. Nachts höre ich oft mein Herz unregelmäßig schlagen und meine Herzfrequenz ist beschleunigt…
Ich kann das wirklich hören, es ist ganz deutlich und es ängstigt mich etwas… Es würde mir nichts ausmachen, wenn ich wüsste, dass es nur ein funktionelles Problem ist…
Das sagten sie mir auch, aber wenn es kommt, tut meine Brust weh, und ich fühle einen Schmerz im Herzen. Obwohl mir die Ärzte sagten, dass das unmöglich sei.
Es scheint in keinem Zusammenhang mit irgendetwas Bestimmtem zu stehen… Wie soll ich es beschreiben… ein Gefühl von Fülle in der Brust… als ob da plötzlich zu viel Blut sei… Und dann fühle ich, wie es sich zusammenzieht…
Und ich möchte nicht so tun, als würde mir das keine Angst einjagen.“
Was genau macht Ihnen Angst?
„Ich kann dieses Gefühl eingeschnürt zu sein nicht ertragen… Zum Beispiel trage ich trotz meiner beruflichen Position auch bei der Arbeit nie, wirklich niemals eine Krawatte und ich trage nur extrem bequeme Kleidung.
Das ist nicht nur eine Sache der Bequemlichkeit… Es hat auch etwas mit meinem Lebensstil und meinen Überzeugungen zu tun.“
Was sind Ihre Überzeugungen?
„Seit einigen Jahren verfolge ich einen spirituellen Weg und -abgesehen von meiner Arbeit als Unternehmer- leite ich einen kleinen Verlag, der nur eine bestimmte Art von Büchern veröffentlicht, ein Nischen-Bereich, nur für jene, die es verstehen können. Seit ich die Verantwortung übernommen habe, sind wir stark gewachsen, und darauf bin ich echt stolz, obwohl wir viele Gegner haben.“
Wieso Gegner?
„Weder ‚Gegner’ noch ‚Konkurrenten’ ist die wirklich richtige Bezeichnung. Genau genommen sind es Feinde, denn sie benutzen die hinterhältigsten Tricks, um für ihr eigenes Material zu werben und unseren Verlag in Misskredit zu bringen.“
Was sind das für Bücher, die Sie herausgeben?
„Wir veröffentlichen die Werke einiger großer Meister der Vergangenheit, aus verschiedenen Kulturen… Mein Ziel ist es zu zeigen, dass zwar Kultur, Geschichte, und Zeiten verschieden sind… aber dass die Botschaft dieser Menschen letztendlich dieselbe ist,... obgleich man es auf unterschiedliche Art und Weise darstellen muss, damit es auch von den einfachsten Leuten verstanden wird.“
Und damit verdienen Sie Geld?
„Nein. Das mit dem Verlag ist eine Art Mission für mich, ich werde nicht dafür bezahlt… Meine Motive sind völlig anders. Früher war es eine größere Verlagsgruppe, aber es kam zu einer Spaltung und man bat mich, die Leitung unserer Gruppe zu übernehmen. Ich entschied dann, einen unabhängigen kleinen Verlag zu gründen, damit wir von niemandem abhängig sind und alles selbst machen können. Haben Sie gewusst, dass alle großen Verlagsgesellschaften auf die gleiche Weise begonnen haben?“
Ist es wichtig für Sie, dass Sie diese Arbeit unentgeltlich machen?
„Ja, vielleicht. Ich glaube, dass es in vielen so genannten Religionen und Sekten eine Menge Vorurteile gegenüber Geld gibt. Darüber will ich mich jetzt nicht weiter auslassen, aber ich versuche nicht, mich durch etwas zu bereichern,was der wichtigste Teil meines Lebens ist. Wenn eine Religion dich in Unwissenheit lässt, dann ist das eine Sache, die wirkliche Wahrheit ist etwas anderes… Jene, die vorgeben das Armutsgelübde abgelegt zu haben oder die sagen, sie seien nicht daran interessiert ihre gesellschaftliche Stellung zu verbessern, bringen mich nur zum Lachen. Das ist reine Heuchelei, eine der offensichtlichsten Unwahrheiten in den so genannten Religionen. Ich bin in dieser Sache extrem ehrlich. Gewisse Mittel sind nicht bloß notwendig, sie sind einfach essentiell… Aber es ist ein Unterschied, ob man sie benutzt, um ein Ideal zu pflegen oder um sie auf persönliche Weise und aus rein egoistischem Vergnügen zu genießen.“
Was haben Sie sonst noch für Beschwerden, außer den Problemen mit den Augen?
„Oft leide ich an Schlaflosigkeit und das führt dann zum Kollaps, oder ich schlafe einige Nächte, aber nicht sehr tief. Das geht jetzt so seit einigen Jahren. Drei Jahre lang machte meine Tochter kaum ein Auge zu und seitdem ist mein Schlaf nicht mehr wie früher. Es ist zwar etwas besser geworden, aber in letzter Zeit kann ich kaum eine Nacht durchschlafen.“
Was genau sind Ihre Schlafprobleme?
„Ich kann schwer einschlafen. Ich fange an, über Dinge nachzudenken und dann beginnt das Gedankenkarussell… Spezielle Dinge im Zusammenhang mit meiner Arbeit. Da ich ein selbständiger Unternehmer bin, gab es ja immer viele Dinge über die ich nachdenken musste.“
Gibt es wiederkehrende Träume?
„An die meisten meiner Träume erinnere ich mich nicht, mit Ausnahme von einem, wo ich eingesperrt bin und alles zerschlagen muss, um herauszukommen…
Es endet immer schlecht, weil ich immer der erste bin, der verletzt wird, wenn ich Dinge zertrümmere… Ich weiß nicht, wie ich es besser erklären soll… Ich bringe die Ketten zum Reißen und die Eisenglieder zerbersten, sie fliegen hoch und schlagen mir ins Gesicht und verletzen mich… Oder meine Haut wird dabei zerfetzt und zurück bleiben eine Menge Narben.“
Noch weitere Träume?
„Als ich jung war, hatte ich einen sehr schönen Traum, worin ich einer Gruppe von Feinden gegenüberstand. Meistens wurde ich direkt von einer Kanonenkugel getroffen, so dass ich in tausend kleine Stücke zerbrach, die alle kleine Versionen meines Selbst wurden… Eine Art Armee von wütenden kleinen Klonen… kennen Sie Walt Disneys Fantasia… die Episode mit dem Zaubererlehrling, der den Besen in eine Menge Stücke zerbricht?“
Wie ist Ihr beruflicher Werdegang?
„Nachdem ich die Schule verließ, begann ich zu arbeiten und hatte eine große Verantwortung auf meinen Schultern zu tragen. Zwischen achtzehn und dreiunddreißig war es sehr schwer für mich. Ich arbeitete pausenlos, denn ich hatte das Geschäftliche ganz allein zu erledigen.“
Wie meinen Sie das?
„Mein Vater verließ uns und hinterließ ein kleines Familienunternehmen… und ich musste mich allein um alles kümmern. Und dann lernte ich alles über Finanzen, denn mir gefiel es nicht, wie unsere zwei Sparkonten geführt wurden.“
Sie haben sehr viel gearbeitet?
„Ich bin nicht jemand, der weiß, wann man eine Pause einlegen muss…“
Gibt es Krankenhausaufenthalte?
„Ich war einmal im Krankenhaus, weil ich mir das Schienbein gebrochen hatte, nachdem ich mit meinem Fahrrad einen ziemlich schlimmen Unfall hatte. Einer meiner Freunde schnitt mich in einer Kurve…
Der Bruch war sehr schlimm, man konnte den Knochen hervorstehen sehen… Ich bekam eine Entzündung und während meiner Genesung kam eine Thrombose hinzu und eine leichte Lungenembolie… aber ich habe ein dickes Fell…
Ich wurde auch noch an den Hämorrhoiden operiert, weil sie sehr stark bluteten und es so nicht mehr weiter ging. Auch in der Nase wurde ich operiert. Ich weiß nicht mehr an welchem Nasenloch,
aber als ich klein war, habe ich eines kauterisiert bekommen, weil ich so oft Blut auf dem Kopfkissen hatte…“
Was ist in diesem Fall klinisch wichtig?
• Konkurrenzgefühl oder Angriff und Verteidigung
- „Ich kann mich nicht selbst verteidigen“ / „Sie sind meine Feinde“ / „Ich rieche gerne den Schweiß meiner Gegner.“ In seinem Traum wird er zu vielen kleinen
Versionen seines Selbst und tritt so seinen Feinden entgegen
• Blutungsneigung / Blutandrang / Kongestion
- „Als wäre da auf einmal zu viel Blut.“ / Kurzsichtigkeit / Nasenbluten / Hämorrhoiden / Thrombose / Gesichtsröte
• Gefühl der Beengung
- kann enge Kleidung nicht ertragen / etwas muss herauskommen
• Vorstellung von Lähmung / Pilz / Designerkleidung / reagiert sehr empfindlich auf Bilder / kurzsichtig ab dem Alter von drei Jahren / Er will edel, perfekt und fast
aristokratisch wirken
• Träumt davon, in einem Käfig eingesperrt zu sein
• Spiritualität / Religiosität
- Es ist eine Art Mission für mich“
• Physisches gegen Metaphysisches / versteckt seine Instinkte hinter einer geistigen Maske
• Verstecken
- versteckt dunkle Hautflecken
• Überheblichkeit
• Zwei Seiten / Dualität
• Widersprüchlichkeit / Scheinheiligkeit
• Traum von Klonen? Er braucht niemand anderen um zu existieren oder in der Welt zu überleben
• Isoliertheit
• Sehprobleme / Probleme mit den Augen
In jedem von uns steckt ein gewisser Narzissmus. Das Problem ist nicht, ob wir narzisstisch sind oder nicht, sondern was wir damit machen. Wie drücken wir es aus? Wenn man kein bisschen selbstverliebt ist, dann kann man vieles nicht tun - z.B. auf einer Bühne stehen, ein Orchester dirigieren etc. Es gibt einen positiven Narzissmus und einen negativen. Es ist ein „guter“ Narzissmus’, wenn jemand ihn nutzt, um sich weiterzuentwickeln oder anderen Menschen zu helfen - man denke z.B. an einen Lehrer am Podium, der sein Wissen weitergibt. Das ist weder nutzlos, schlecht noch egozentrisch. Diese Menschen stehen im Mittelpunkt, aber im positiven Sinne. Sie bringen Sich selbst in eine angesehene Position und können dadurch anderen Menschen etwas mitteilen. Wahrscheinlich würden sich der Einzelne oder auch die Gesellschaft ohne solche narzisstische Persönlichkeiten nicht verbessern. Gandhi gehörte zu dieser Kategorie.
Bei negativem Narzissmus ist die Person total auf sich selbst fixiert und nur daran interessiert, die eigenen Fähigkeiten zu verbessern. Selbstverliebt in die eigene schöne Gestalt. Oder, im schlimmsten Fall, nutzt so jemand andere Menschen aus, um sich selbst zu verbessern. Al Capone gehört zu dieser Kategorie. Narzissmus ist also nicht zwangsläufig eine schlechte Gesinnung. Doch welche Seite wird hier ausgelebt?
Verlauf: - Ein bis drei Monate später
Er nahm als Potenz Q1, die nach zwei Wochen abgesetzt werden musste wegen Kopfschmerz und Nasenbluten. Daraufhin nahm er zwei Mal die Woche ein paar Tropfen und später einmal die Woche.
Dieses Mal sieht er anders aus, viel normaler und sein Verhalten ist nicht so bombastisch und extrem egoistisch und wirkt nicht so verführerisch.
Altero erzählt:
„Ich vergaß letztes Mal zu erzählen, dass ich vor Jahren Labyrinthitis hatte mit Schwindel. Nach Ihrem Medikament kamen diese Episoden wieder und es ging mir jedes Mal sehr schlecht. Als es vor Jahren ein letztes Mal auftauchte, sah man als Ursache ein Kreislaufproblem und ich erhielt dafür Medikamente. Ab dem Zeitpunkt begann mein Bluthochdruck.
Ich habe immer noch Momente mit fahrigen Gedanken. Es ist für mich nicht leicht, die richtigen Worte zu finden.“
Erzählen Sie mir mehr darüber...
„Was mir zu anderen Zeiten ganz natürlich erscheint, wird plötzlich verbindungslos. Ich kann mich nicht genau daran erinnern, was ich gerade dachte und fühle mich dann verloren, obwohl es mir wenige Minuten zuvor alles noch ganz klar war.“
Haben Sie das schon länger?
„Ja. Ich musste lernen, mit meinen Emotionen umzugehen und sie zu verstecken. Anders ging es nicht, denn so wurde ich von meinen Eltern erzogen.“
Was ist mit dem Schwindel?
„Eines Tages wollte ich morgens aufstehen, doch als ich aus dem Bett sprang, wurde mir schwindelig und ich wusste nicht mehr, wo ich mich befand. Ich musste ganz still halten, ohne zu denken. Vollkommen still. Ich konnte meinen Kopf nur nach rechts drehen, nicht nach links. Seitdem habe ich immer ein komisches Gefühl, wenn ich mich vorwärts beuge. Wenn mir bei der Arbeit, z.B. während einer Konferenz, mein Füllhalter zu Boden fällt, gerate ich in Panik. Ich muss ihn aufheben und was könnte dabei geschehen? Meine Hauptsorge ist, dass die Leute vielleicht merken könnten, was in mir vorgeht.“
Was geht denn in Ihnen vor?
„In bestimmten Augenblicken habe ich das Gefühl, dass irgendetwas die Ketten durchbricht.“
Wann kommt dieses Gefühl?
„Das passiert meistens, wenn es sehr kalt ist. Es kommt viel häufiger im Winter als im Sommer. Ich habe Probleme mit der Wärmeregulation. Wenn ich sehr müde bin, fröstelt es mich leicht. Und ich leide unter heißem Wetter, weil dann meine Energie nicht groß ist.“
Gibt es sonst noch etwas zu berichten?
„Beim letzten Mal vergaß ich zu erzählen, dass ich auch schon einmal Nierenkoliken hatte. Ich sollte viel trinken und drei Jahre lang keinerlei Milchprodukte essen. Eines Tages kam ein Kalziumstein heraus. Beim letzten Mal hatte ich nur etwas Sand in den Nieren und man hat mir mehrmals ein starkes Schmerzmittel gespritzt.“
Wann haben Sie diese Nierenbeschwerden?
„Das passiert zu bestimmten Zeiten. Ich schwitze dann ganz extrem und habe doch keinen Durst. Und ich leide an Mangelernährung.
In den letzten Wochen hatte ich häufig brennende Schmerzen im Magen. Da hilft mir am besten viel frischer Orangensaft. Das Problem ist geringer, wenn ich keinerlei Tomaten esse. Doch ansonsten habe ich einen starken Magen. Ich kann sogar Steine verdauen. Aber wenn ich wirklich krank bin, fällt es mir sogar schwer, etwas Wasser zu trinken.“
Was können Sie mir über Ihren Gemütszustand sagen?
„Ich habe so eine Tendenz, zu emotional zu sein. Und was mir wirklich fehlt, ist, irgendetwas zu starten. Ich genieße die Gefühle bei einem Start, wie beim Start eines
Wettkampfes oder Rennens. Diese Art von Emotion fehlt mir. Nicht den Wettkampf vermisse ich, sondern den Adrenalinschuss im Blut. Solange ich noch Wettkämpfe bestritt, habe ich teilweise sechs Kilo an einem Wochenende verloren. Aber ich bevorzuge ganz klar Einzelsportarten wie Skilaufen, Motorsport oder Tennis - keinen Mannschaftssport. Ich konnte noch nie einen Mannschaftssport ausüben.“
Warum?
„Ich bin nicht so dumm, um nicht zu verstehen, wann meine Probleme anfangen. Es fällt mir schwer, ihnen das zu gestehen. Meine eigentlichen Krisen entstehen immer dann, wenn ich sehr enttäuscht worden bin. Wie beispielsweise bei einem Verrat.“
Wer hat Sie verraten?
„Es begann damit, als ich erkannte, dass mein Vater eine Art Krimineller ist. Er machte viel Geld auf illegale Weise. Dann starb mein Judotrainer (mein Idol), weil er betrunken einen Autounfall hatte. Und zu guter Letzt nahm mir der andere Trainer meine Freundin weg. Und jetzt interessiert sich meine Geliebte für einen anderen Mann.“
Ihre Geliebte...?
„Ja, sie ist nicht meine Frau.“ (Seine Geliebte hatte eine Affäre mit einem anderen Mann.). „Das ist immer wieder das Gleiche. Ich habe oft Affären mit meinen Sekretärinnen oder Angestellten im Unternehmen. Der Erotikkult beschäftigt mich sehr. Ich habe mich mehrere Jahre lang mit tantrischem Sex befasst und es mit viel Erfolg praktiziert. Meine Frau allerdings hat sich niemals für diese Dinge interessiert, und ich wiederum könnte nicht mit diesen Frauen zusammenleben. Denn ich bin überzeugt davon, dass diese Sache nichts mit der Ehe zu tun hat, weil es etwas völlig anderes ist.“
Haben Sie schon einmal mit einem Psychologen darüber gesprochen?
(Er begann, laut zu schreien.) „Erzählen Sie mir nur nichts über Psychologen! Das ist nur ein Haufen unkompetenter Halunken, die die wahre menschliche Psyche nicht verstehen. Weil sie niemals eine wirklich spirituelle Schulung hatten. Wahre Psychologie ist die Psychologie, die schon seit alters her existiert. Der Rest ist bloß oberflächlicher Mist. Verstehen Sie? Ach, ich rede dauernd über andere Dinge und jetzt habe ich Ihre Frage vergessen.
Auf meinem spirituellen Pfad folgte ich jemandem, einer Frau, die mich wirklich inspirierte. Aber auch durch sie erfuhr ich eine ernsthafte Enttäuschung. Es war nicht das erste Mal, dass ich mit Frauen aus meinem Unternehmen eine Affäre hatte. Ich habe immer viel mit ihnen unternommen, denn ich bin ein sehr guter Mann, der sich immer um menschliche Angelegenheiten kümmert. Dabei geht es mir nicht nur um den rein physischen Geschlechtsverkehr.“
[Wenn er bei einer Person (Frau) Probleme sieht, ist sein Verhalten der eines Meisters, der permanent gibt. Er wird niemals eine Beziehung mit jemandem eingehen, weil er die Oberhand behalten will. Wie in Pygmäleon - er erkennt, dass eine Frau Probleme hat und will ihr helfen].
„Denn Sex mit einer sehr schönen Frau haben, das kann jeder. Aber die wahre Essenz von Erotik beinhaltet, ein echtes Gefühl der Vereinigung zwischen zwei Menschen zu spüren.“
Haben Sie das in Ihren Beziehungen erreicht?
„Mehr oder weniger endeten sie alle auf die gleiche Weise. Am Ende wollte jede Frau immer mehr. Trotz meiner Anstrengungen konnte ich bisher keine Frau finden, die fähig war, mit solch einer Beziehung richtig umzugehen.“
Und Ihre Frau...?
„Meine Frau entdeckte es dieses Mal, weil diese andere Frau bei mir zuhause anrief. Aber ich hatte schon beschlossen, meine Frau zu verlassen. Nachdem wir unsere Tochter bekommen hatten, schwand bei mir auch noch jegliches intellektuelle Interesse an meiner Frau. Sie war immer eine unsichere Person und doch wie ein Anker auf meinem physischen Weg. Wir trafen uns, weil wir beide sehr interessiert an Literatur waren. Aber sie verstand nie richtig, was ich gerne lese.“
Warum haben Sie sie geheiratet?
„Sie wurde schwanger.“ (Er will keine weiteren Aussagen zu diesem Thema machen.)
Wie geht es in Ihrem Beruf und mit der Arbeit?
„Bei der Arbeit ist alles in Ordnung, aber ich glaube, dass ich das Unternehmen wechseln werde. Ich werde alle meine Aktien zurückgeben und in ein anderes besseres Unternehmen einsteigen.“
(Ich fand später heraus, dass das nicht stimmte. Er war ein Angestellter auf hoher Ebene, aber kein Teilhaber. Sie kündigten ihm wegen seiner Affäre mit einer Kollegin.)
Erzählen Sie mir noch ein wenig über Ihre Beziehung zu Ihrem Vater....
„Ich spreche nicht gerne über meinen Vater, denn ich fühlte mich nie von ihm geliebt. Er bewertete mich danach, was ich tun oder nicht tun konnte. Dabei war ich immer der Beste und fühle mich auch verantwortlich für die Entscheidungen in meinem Leben. Schlimm war für mich, als ich entdeckte, wie er zu seinem Geld kam… doch das ist zu persönlich, um es zu erzählen.“
Was empfinden Sie bei dem Gedanken an ihn?
„Gegenüber meinen Eltern empfinde ich einen starkes und tiefes Gefühl des Zorns. Wann immer ich an meine Eltern denke, werde ich zornig. Ich denke, dass Wut eine Emotion ist wie jede andere, nichts besonderes. Ich bin einer der wenigen Menschen, die sich ein tiefes Gefühl des Zorns zugestehen. So etwas würde nach katholischer Moral als Sünde gelten. Ich glaube, dass die katholische Kirche uns einfach ignorant halten wollte. Wir sollen nichts verstehen und nicht wachsen können. Ich will als Mann vollkommen sein, das ist das Hauptziel meiner Existenz. Diese Erfahrung auf unserem Planeten ist nicht irgendein blöder Quatsch. Da gibt es Heilige und Krieger und sogar Krieger, die Heilige sind. Meine Schlaflosigkeit ist jetzt viel schlimmer geworden. Selbst Pillen und Kräuter helfen nicht. Ich habe noch nie einen guten Schlaf gehabt. Es fällt mir schwer einzuschlafen, ich wache häufig wieder auf und liege ruhelos im Bett. Ich denke, das hat viele verschiedene Ursachen. Da gibt es eine Art Frustration, die ich nicht erklären kann. Ich gebe mir wirklich Mühe, erst ins Bett zu gehen, wenn ich richtig müde bin.“
Er erwähnte nicht ein einziges Mal seine Blutungen wie in der ersten Konsultation.
Auf Nachfrage:
„Die Blutungen, ach ja… daran habe ich gar nicht mehr gedacht. Es sind jetzt so viele andere Gedanken in meinem Kopf, dass ich geistig ganz woanders bin.“
Offensichtlich beunruhigt es ihn dieses Mal nicht so sehr wie bei der ersten Konsultation.
Er soll mit dem gleichen Mittel fortfahren in der Q3.
Nach vier Monaten
Dieses Mal erschien er in einer eher niedergedrückten Haltung, nicht gerade deprimiert, aber in keiner guten Stimmung. Die Scheidung stand kurz bevor. Aber er bemühte sich nicht mehr so sehr, seine Probleme zu verstecken oder als gewitzte, brillante Person zu gelten. Er war offener, seine Probleme zuzugeben und eher bereit, sich ihnen zu stellen und sie zu lösen.
Altero sagt mir:
„Immer wieder erlebe ich Momente eines schnellen Wechsels zwischen Euphorie und Depression. Ich glaube, dass ich übersensibel bin. Wenn irgendetwas passiert, dann beschäftigt mich das Problem zu sehr. Ich fühle mich auch bei der Arbeit nicht wohl. Damit ich nicht zu viel daran denken muss, treibe ich viel Sport. Vielleicht wäre es besser gewesen in einem solchen Umfeld zu arbeiten, denn ich bin eine sehr sportliche Person.
Wenn man so etwas als Beruf betreibt, muss man an Wettbewerben teilnehmen, das gehört nun mal dazu (Auch im Geschäft will er eine solche Konkurrenzhaltung beibehalten, nur ist es da nicht so offensichtlich.). Aber das ist eine Welt der Haie, die sich gegenseitig heimlich umbringen. Und ich brauche das Geld schließlich zum Überleben.“
Wie ist die Situation mit Ihrer Frau?
„Es ist wirklich schlimm. Meine Frau ist dabei, mich finanziell völlig zu ruinieren.“
(In anderen Fällen dieses Mittels gibt es oft eine lange Vorgeschichte, wo sich der Patient Opfer eines ernsthaften Verrats fühlt, oft im Zusammenhang mit Menschen, die ihm sehr nahe stehen). „Eines der Hauptprobleme ist, dass aus steuerlichen Gründen nichts auf meinem Namen eingetragen war. Folglich gehört meiner Frau alles.“ (Er musste öffentlich eine Bankrotterklärung abgeben, was seinem Ruf schadete.)
Gibt es weitere Beschwerden?
„Seit kurzem bin ich etwas besorgt um meine Augen. Obgleich ich kaum Energiereserven habe, bin ich sehr engagiert bei meiner Arbeit. Wenn ich im Stress bin, habe ich das Gefühl, dass meine Augen geschwollen sind und weh tun, aber ohne dass ich Blutungen hätte. Ich vergaß zu erzählen, dass ich seit Jahren im Frühling allergisch auf mehrere Pflanzen reagiere. Es begann mit häufigem Augentränen, da war ich ungefähr 16 Jahre, und ich musste in dieser Zeit eine Menge Nasenspray benutzen. Jetzt ist es das erste Mal in meinem Leben, dass ich keinerlei Allergien habe. Ich kann sogar gut atmen und habe keine Schmerzen mehr in der Brust.
Und erfreulicherweise ist auch mein Blutdruck in Ordnung. Die Blutungen haben aufgehört, doch beunruhigen mich diese Augenschmerzen. Ich war bei einem Augenarzt, doch er meinte, dass meine Augen in Ordnung seien.
Manchmal wird mir auch leicht schwindelig. Ich habe das Gefühl, als ob jemand mir mit einem Stock auf den Nacken schlägt.“ (Wieder wird das Problem projiziert, als wenn jemand anderes ihm Leid antun will.)
„Ich weiß, ich habe ein starkes Ego. Ich investiere eine Menge Energie, nur um mein Bestes zu geben und immer der Erste zu sein. Weil ich meine andere Arbeit (die Druckerei) aufgeben musste, wollte ich mehr über Psychologie lesen... Selbst in diesem Verein beschäftigt man sich theoretisch mit Philosophie und Religion, doch der Ex-Vorsitzende bemühte sich nach allen Kräften, mir meinen Job wegzunehmen.“
Haben Sie eine neue Beziehung?
„Ja, ich bin jetzt mit einer anderen Frau zusammen. Sie hat mir eine Menge über ihre Erfahrungen mit einer Psychotherapeutin erzählt. Ihre Psychotherapeutin hatte auch eine spirituelle Schulung. Ich glaube, so etwas würde ich gerne auch probieren. Mit ihr habe ich sehr intensiven Sex. Aber eins ist mir noch nie im Leben passiert. Ich konnte früher stundenlang Sex haben und es war in Ordnung, aber mit dieser neuen Frau ist alles nach wenigen Minuten vorbei. Doch sie ist sehr glücklich, und ich will nicht dauernd mit derselben alten Technik weitermachen. Glauben Sie, dass ich damit auf dem richtigen Weg bin?“
Dann geht es Ihnen ganz gut soweit?
„Es stimmt, ich habe nicht mehr so viele körperliche Probleme. Aber ich habe jetzt so viele emotionale Schwierigkeiten.“
Altero rief wegen einer Grippe an mit hohem Fieber. Er nahm eine Wiederholungsgabe des gleichen Mittels und es ging ihm nach wenigen Stunden schon besser. Danach studierte er vier Jahre lang Psychotherapie.
Ich begleitete ihn noch weitere sechs Jahre, und nur noch wenige Male musste das gleiche Mittel als Wiederholungsgabe gegeben werden. Jedes Mal wegen Schlaflosigkeit.
Cure takes Time
A constitution cannot be radically changed for the better in a week or a
month. Hahnemann demanded at least two years for the cure of a chronic case.
When such a case comes for treatment, refuse to take it unless the patient will
promise all the time required. A patient may be told that his immediate
condition may be ameliorated, but he must not consider himself cured and may
experience a return of symptoms. The Prescriber - J.H. Clarke MD
Hering’s laws:
From above downwards.
From within outwards.
From a more important organ to a less important one.
In the reverse order of their coming.
Sankaran has outlined 6 basic levels that should be traced during a
homoeopathic case taking:
Level 1: Pathological (The main complaint or diagnosis)
Level 2: Symptomatic (Description of actual symptoms, such as local
symptoms, modalities and location)
Level 3: Emotional (What does it feel like? What is the emotional state
of the patient whilst experiencing the symptoms?)
Level 4: Delusion (What does the patient feel like? Symptoms of the
neuro-endocine-immune axis)
Level 5: Sensation (The sensation felt in the body when exploring the
symptoms)
Level 6: Energy (Background pattern, movements and patterns observed or
evoked by the interview experience)
[Dr. Margaret Lucy Tyler and Sir John Weir] presented by Sylvain Cazalet
Success in Repertorising depends on ability to deal with symptoms; and
this has to be taught; it is not innate (= immanent). People all the world over
are wasting their lives, working out
cases at enormous expenditure of time and minutest care, for
comparatively poor results: and all for want of a little initial help. The key
to the enigma, which they lack, is
GRADING of SYMPTOMS... The grading of symptoms in such-wise as to
economise labour without compromising results; and, in the cases where all the
more-or-less-indicated remedies lack some symptom or other of the totality, to
know which symptoms are of vital importance to the correct prescription; and
which are of less importance, and may therefore probably be neglected; and also
which may be safely used as eliminating symptoms, to throw out remedies by the
dozen from the very start; and which cannot be safely used to throw out any
remedies at all, on pain of perhaps losing the very drug one is in search of -
the curative simillimum.
To begin with, symptoms are of
two orders:
a) those general to the patient as a whole (
b) those particular, not to the patient as a whole, but to some part of
him (
Repertorisieren in Akute:
Elaine, my daughter had swine flu! I wish I could write it up for you but
I wasn’t able to help her much. I tried maybe 8 different remedies during the
course of the illness but nothing really helped.
My sister had the same symptoms when she stayed with me the month
before. Poor thing was sooo sick- she’s still talking about it! I tried many
remedies to no avail.
After she left, I bought 2 remedies that I thought would have helped her
(that I didn’t have) just in case one of us came down with it. But, none of
them helped my daughter.
I wondered what others have found helpful for this flu because:
* Gels.
* Bry.
* Ars.
* Acon.
* Eup-per.
and a bunch of others did nothing.
The symptoms were (in order) sore throat, high (104° F) fever, severe
body aches, severe chilliness, pounding headache.
Now Kelly, as you know, none of the symptoms you just mentioned mean
anything to the homeopath!
What?
And why do I say that? Because the Repertory rubrics for these
designations (fever, sore throat, etc.) are so large, so huge, so generic that
virtually every homeopathic remedy in the Materia Medica covers them!!!
Homeopathy is a system of “peculiars”. What’s peculiar about your fever? What’s
strange about your sore throat? That’s what we have to know! This is the only
way we can find a remedy. Towards that end always remember: The Big 4!
The Big 4?
Yes, the Big 4: Sensation, Location, Modalities, Concomitants
Oh my God! You’re right! It’s a little tricky, I gotta admit; but, I
think you’ve got something going there! So, I think you better tell everyone
what the Modalities are.
Kelly, modalities are REALLY important to us; if we don’t get the
modalities in a case, we may not be able to solve it! Modalities are all the
factors that exert an influence on the complaint! For example, you have the
flu, let’s say; and believe it or not, there will be factors that will make it
better or worse and we need to know what these things are; you may be better
for cold drinks, or, worse from fresh air, or better for hot bathing or hot
drinks like tea, or better from hand-holding and sympathy, or worse from all
company and conversation. These little details could not possibly be more
important to the homeopath! Try and think of EVERYTHING that makes your
complaint better or worse!
And what about concomitants, what are they?
Concomitants are the adjunctive symptoms in the case. “Additional
symptoms”. They are highly valued because they are often the striking, strange,
rare or peculiar ones which Hahnemann says we need to know or the likelihood of
cure is rather slim. Take for example, menstrual cramps with burping. What does
burping have to do with menstrual cramps? Nothing, that’s what makes it the
concomitant! I need a remedy that burps and hopefully also has cramps! When
Shana had menstrual cramps one time and started burping, I went right for the
Carb-v. (our major burping remedy) I didn’t even stop to think about it! It
worked too!
Observing the patient is very important and can often give you the
concomitant. Observe what the patient is doing and saying. This is so
important, it’s part of my questionnaire: What are you doing? What are you
saying?
Sometimes body language tells us what we need to know. Bryonia patients
are lying perfectly still and won’t answer your questions (because the
slightest movement aggravates - even talking).
Colocynth and Mag-p. patients are bent over double. Gels. patients
answer every question with “Huh…?” because they’re in a semi-stupor. Nux-v. is
rudely making demands (“I’m still waiting for the glass of water I asked for
two seconds ago!”). Ars. beggs you not to leave! (“Can’t you just stay one
minute more?”)
Do you need to know anything else besides the Big 4?
Which, again, are?
OK, singing now: Sensation-Location,
Modalities-Concomitants/Sensation-location, modalities-concomitants!
Very good Kelly! Yes, yes it would help to know more; three more things:
1. Is there a time issue? Is the patient < in the evening? < 219
h.? < at midnight, etc.? Think of this as the Time Modality.
2. Did the complaint come on suddenly or gradually? Complaints that come
on suddenly are often covered by just two remedies! Acon. and Bell.!
Really?
Sometimes Bapt., if the case is septic.
And what does that mean?
Sepsis is characterized by bad odors, stuporousness, confusion, etc. If
a septic condition comes on suddenly, think of Bapt. Bapt. is thought of as a
“worse” Gelsemium with the addition of thirst; plus, stuporous presentation,
apathy and inclination to sleep.
3. I’m leaving the best for last.
What’s that?
3. Etiology!
That means the cause! Am I right?
Yes. You have to know this! The remedy must cover it! Unless the
etiology is something vague, like, “germs” or something really common, it alone
could be so valuable as to solve the case for you! How often has this happened?
You’ve taken the case, it looks really good for a certain remedy, like Bell.:
the patient is red, full of heat, burning; you’re just about to give
Ladies and Gentlemen, take note: Etiology Over-rules Symptomatology!
We seldom need to know any details, such is the importance of etiology.
So, getting back to your daughter’s flu, when you say “sore throat”, I
would say:
What was the sensation?
What makes it better or worse?
Where in the throat is it, right side? left side? the whole thing?
We need to do this for every symptom. A properly delivered symptom would
sound something like this:
I have constipation with no urging which is chronic and causes much
abdominal pain which causes me to bend over double and rub as hard
And why do I say that? Because the Repertory rubrics for these
designations (fever, sore throat, etc.) are so large, so huge, so generic that
virtually every homeopathic remedy in the Materia Medica covers them!!!
Homeopathy is a system of “peculiars”. What’s peculiar about your fever? What’s
strange about your sore throat? That’s what we have to know! This is the only
way we can find a remedy. Towards that end always remember: The Big 4!
Anything else you need to know in taking an acute case?
WHAT’S WRONG!
WHEN DID IT START, AND, DID IT COME ON SUDDENLY or GRADUALLY?
DO YOU KNOW WHAT CAUSED IT?
(Don’t forget to observe the patient; what’s he doing, what’s he saying,
what does he look like?)
WHAT MAKES YOU BETTER OR WORSE IN GENERAL?
(this includes time of day when person is better or worse) Plus, all the
“I” symptoms.
THE LOCAL SYMPTOMS with THE BIG 4: sensation, location, modalities,
concomitants
(You need to know this for each local symptom that’s part of the case!
Don’t tell your homeopath, “My leg hurts! My scalp itches!” Say, “My leg hurts
in the calf area, I got it from over-stretching, it’s better from rubbing.” “My
scalp itches. Scratching makes it worse! Very hot water makes it stop.”)
Remember that Concomitants are any symptoms that are unexpected or just
curious. They may be “normal” but out of place, or in excess, or less than what
you’d expect like lack of thirst during fever.
IF THE CASE HAS A MENTAL/EMOTIONAL
CONCOMITANT, THE REMEDY MUST MATCH THAT (unless it’s vague or common)!
Is there a hierarchy of symptoms?
It happens there is! We’ve already said that etiology overrules
symptomatology, and that Generals are more valuable than Particulars in terms
of remedy matching. So, here it goes:
Diagnosis/name of the condition-aka, “The Chief Complaint” (ask patient
to describe in his own words)
Onset-sudden or gradual
Etiology (what caused the complaint, and when)
The Appearance-what does the patient look like? What does he ”say” and
“do”? (He may say things like, “I’m doomed!” or “Bring me some ice!” all clues
to the remedy; he may be tossing and turning; or, conversely, lying perfectly
still; all important information.)
Generals
Particulars (the big 4, which are, again?)
Are you askin’ me? Are you talkin’ to me?
So now you’re Robert DeNiro all of a sudden? Let’s move on to
discharges. If there are discharges, you’ll want to know their color, odor and
consistency. You’ll also want to know if they create a sensation - like
burning, irritation or itching, etc.
Plus, for heaven’s sake, don’t mix up acute and chronic symptoms! Don’t
tell the homeopath you’re thirsty if you’re ALWAYS thirsty! Don’t tell him
you’re irritable if you’re ALWAYS irritable!!
By knowing how to solve acute cases, you can stop a complaint from going
chronic! You can save a life! You can stop a person’s suffering! Even people
with chronic disease develop acutes of one kind or another; this is why we have
to treat chronic disease in a manner that allows us to stop the chronic remedy
during an acute, give the acute remedy, and resume chronic treatment when the
acute resolves. Obviously high-potency, one-dose chronic prescribing does not
lend itself to this! We can’t let people suffer, they’ll leave homeopathy and
go right to their doctor!
Patients must not be expected to describe their sensations in the bald
language of the repertory. A patient will more likely say, “The pain is worse
when my hat is on”, than he will say, means “The pain is aggravated by
pressure”.
Do not go against the modalities: [Elaine
Lewis]
Modalities are the things that make the complaint better or worse.
(itchy rash isn’t better for hot applications, don’t give Rhus-t! Rash isn’t
aggravated by hot bathing, don’t give Sulph.! If a person is better for a good
night’s sleep, don’t give Lach.! If a person says, “I love warm, stuffy rooms”,
don’t give Puls. your first choice! It’s hard to imagine what could be more
important in a case than the modalities (except finding the cause)! Be sure and
ask for them. When someone tells you their complaints first try to find out the
cause, what caused it, because you may be able to use an “ailments from” rubric
to solve the case, which might make the symptoms, themselves, irrelevant; then,
if discovering the cause does not open up the case for you, ask them, “What
makes it better or worse?” I don’t care what they say is wrong with them.
Sometimes we can be overwhelmed when we hear a case! So much is wrong! It
sounds so serious! Just remember to say, “What caused it?” Then, “What makes it
better? What makes it worse?” Give examples: heat, cold, motion, cold drinks,
hot drinks, lying down, hot or cold applications, sympathy/company, massage,
pressure, sleep, etc. There’s almost nothing you can do if all you have is the
name of the illness! But for example, if someone says, “I have a headache
that’s better for hard pressure,” that could be Bry.! Now, try to think of a
remedy that’s WORSE for hard pressure-that’s the remedy NOT to give!
Acute Case Taking in a Nutshell:
Here are the basics questions to be answered:
What changed since you got sick?
When did it start?
Do you know what caused the problem?
What are the symptoms? (physical and mental)
Do they extend from one place?
What are the sensations? (burning, aching, stinging, itching etc.)
What are the locations of the symptoms?
What are the modalities? (What makes it better or worse?)
What are the concomittments? (What symptoms occur together?)
Prescribing on Causation
Some remedies associated with specific causes. For example, Colocynth is
effective for internal spasms caused by anger.
Dehydration: Chin. Carb-v.
Grief or loss: Ign. Nat-m., Caus.;
Vaccination: Thuj. Sil.;
Head injuries: Arn. Nat-s. Hyper.
Humiliation: Staph. Ign. Lyc.
Sexual abstinence: Con.
Repertorisieren for Chronic Ailments:
Look for:
Excesses, Deficiencies, Blockages, Loss of vital fluid. Also,
sensitivities to noise, weather, etc. What do they over-react to?
Motivation: What’s their motivation for doing whatever it is they say
they’re doing? For example, Nux-v. is ambitious. Ars. feels vulnerable and
insecure so he is motivated to accumulate more money than he actually needs and
to cultivate a support network of people who are dependent on him so they can
never leave. Phos. is motivated to make friends in order to counter the
delusion that he is alone, isolated on some distant island.
What is the focus of their time/energy/attention? What is dissipating
their energy? Is there suffering? Treat any suffering first. Look for keynotes
of remedies.
See if there is a compelling etiology. For example if everything
happened after a head injury, that fact is more important than the totality of
symptoms. The rubric would be ”Head: injuries, ailments from”.
The top layer is a chronic disease with X or Y acutes. You’ll need a
remedy for the disease and an intercurrent remedy for the acute/s.
Determine the “essence” remedy underneath the disease. Finally,
determine the constitutional remedy-the healthy state the person was born with.
It could be calc-carb, sulphur, etc. For example: Disease: cancer-
remedy-conium. Essence remedy underneath: Nat-m. Constitutional remedy under
Nat-m.: Phosphorus. How would you know? The cancerous tumor is hard/indurated
with a concomitant of vertigo on turning the head - Con. The Patient began her
life as an out-going, sociable person, extroverted, tall and thin; then was put
into foster care after losing her parents and became Nat-m. (Nat-m. has a
relationship with Con. according to Robin Murphy.)
Regarding Aggravations: If a remedy aggravates with no amelioration, it
could mean: right remedy, but out of order. You may be overlooking a recent
layer; may have prescribed “too deep”. Look for suffering in the case which
needs to be cleared first; such as, pain or infection or disease/pathology. Try
the remedy again after you have cleared the top layer and it might work then.
THE GRADING OF SYMPTOMS
1st grade: MENTAL
SYMPTOMS if well marked. These take the highest rank; and a strongly marked
mental symptom will always rule out any number of poorly-marked symptoms of
lesser grade. (For these may never have appeared in the drug-pathogenesis -
perhaps for lack of a sufficiently drastic proving; and yet, time and again,
the drug will clear them up). The mental symptoms, always provided that they
are very definite and well-marked, are the most important symptoms of the case.
But for the mental symptoms
particularly, it is well to go constantly through the Repertory (Mind-section),
and to master all that is presents; and to make cross references; and to be
sure that you get the correct rubric; and often combine two rubrics that
practically amount to the same thing, and yet do not give quite the same list
of drugs. As, for instance, aversion to company and better alone may not be
quite the same thing; and yet it is often difficult to sort them. Again, worse
in the dark, and fear of darkness are difficult to fix correctly in many cases,
while the elements fear of robbers, fear of ghosts - of apparitions, etc., may
come in: so here you have at least 4 rubrics which you may have to combine on
pain of missing something. Many of the rubrics must be considered in company,
and all with intelligence and some elasticity, or there is great danger of
eliminating the very drug you are in search of. And - the better you know your
Repertory, the more rapid your work will be, and the better your results. Never
grudge turning its pages!
2nd grade, after the
mental symptoms, and his reactions to mental environment, come, if well marked,
such general symtoms of the patient as his reactions, as a whole, to bodily
environment: - to times and seasons, to heat and cold, to damp and dry, to
storm and tempest, to position, pressure, motion, jar, touch, etc. But they
have got to be in capitals or in italics in the patient as well as in the
Repertory, to take this rank; or to be safely used, some of them, as
eliminating symptoms. ("Some of them", because there are perhaps only
half-a-dozen symptoms which it is at all safe to use in this way; and then
only, of course, if strongly marked).
And, once again, be sure that you have your very rubric; and if
necessary combine two rubrics that work out practically as synonyms, and yet do
not present quite the same list of drugs. A doctor was driven to despair over a
case of melancholia by using better for open air instead of desire for open
air. The symptom was so intensely marked that it was used without hesitation as
an eliminating symptom, ruling out
3rd grade general
symptoms are CRAVINGS and AVERSIONS. But to be elevated to such rank, they must
not be mere likes and dislikes, but longings and loathings: in big types in the
Repertory, and in the patient - in corresponding types, anyhow !
In corresponding types everywhere
and all through: and this is most important. As, for instance, if your patient
is only a little restless, Ars. and Rhus-t., superlatively restless remedies,
will, of course, be rather contra-indicated. Big types in the Repertory will
never help you, unless the symptoms are big type in the patient too. In first
taking the case, it is well to vary the type as you set down the symptoms; to
put those poorly marked in brackets, and to underline the intensely marked
symptoms: for that will help you to match them correctly.
4th in women, the
MENSTRUAL STATE, i.e., general aggravation of symptoms before, during and after
the menses. Of lower rank comes the question of menses early, late, and
excessive - and this last of course only where there is nothing such a polypus,
fibroid, menopause, to account for it.
5th PARTICULARS - the
symptoms that bulk so largely for the patient, and for which he is as a matter
of fact, actually consulting you. You will have taken them down first, with the
utmost care and detail, listening to his story, and interrupting as little as
possible; but you will consider them last: for these symptoms are really of
minor importance from your point of view (certainly in chronic cases) because
they are general to the patient as a living whole, but only particulars to some
part of him. In a great railway system, for instance, a strike that raises the
price of fuel for a few weeks, an accident on the line that means compensation
to the repair of few yards of permanent way, are less vital to the Company than
the brain quality of its General Manager, of the force, competence and activity
of the Chairman and Board of Directors. Make the executive of the Company
efficient, and it will deal in the best way with details. In like manner, put
your patient, as a whole, in order, and he will straighten out the disorder of
his parts. You have got to get at him; and you can only get at him through his
general and mental symptoms. Start for the Particulars, and see where they land
you! In the body politic, where the executive is not sound, you deal with lax
discipline here, with peculation there, with incompetence, and disorder, and
slackness, and inefficiency. There is rottenness at the core; and you will find
that as fast as you clear up one mess; the system breaks down at a new part. Go
for the Management; put that right; and let it act. So with your work: - start
treating an eczema, per se, and "cure" it, to find yourself
confronted with - say asthma; prescribe for that, and the wretched patient
comes back presently with a brand-new disease - Rheuma: tinker with that - and
the heart gives out. Go for the executive - for the patient himself; - the
patient who was all along capable of eczema - asthma - rheumatism: go for the
patient as a live entity, revealed by his general and mental symptoms in chief;
deal with him according to the Law of Similars, and he will do the rest. Always
provided that the thing has not gone too far, that the tissue changes are not
too gross, he will even undo the rest, step by step backwards, to the
reproduction of the initial lesion on the skin. The whole is greater than its
part. Never juggle with "Particulars" at the expense of the life of
the whole.
But, in their right position of
secondary importance, you must go into the particulars all the same, and with
great care (if only to confirm your choice of the drug); and it will amaze you
to find how they fall into line, when the choice is correct. More than that,
when the drug has been chosen on general grounds, the patient will return and
tell you, not only "I'm better", and that the trouble for which he
consulted you is better, but he will volunteer, "My knees are better too,
all the swelling has gone"; and referring to your notes you discover that
you had never heard of his knees before ! and he will go on and tell you that
his back (of which you hear now for the first time) is much less painful: and
the constipation, which he had not previously mentioned, is a thing of the
pasts. (This was a Nit-ac. case!).
Among the PARTICULARS, your
first-grade symptoms will always be anything peculiar, or unusual, or
unexpected, or unaccountable. You now want to know not only how your patient,
as a whole, reacts to environment, but how his head, his stomach, his lungs,
his muscles and joints stand heat and cold, damp weather and dry, react to
stuffy atmosphere or draughts, desire or resent movement and jar. You will find
one headache being banged against the wall; while another has to be nursed with
such extreme care that the sufferer dare not move a finger, and would swear, if
the movement of his lips were not agony, when you clumsily lurch against his
bed. Or another headache will demand a bolt-upright position; while for a
fourth the only thing is to kneel up, while it is pressed low into the pillow,
or against the floor.
Now, to get the terms clearly
A GENERAL SYMPTOM, OR A GENERAL, IS
ONE THAT REFERS TO THE PATIENT HIMSELF, AS A WHOLE, AND OF WHICH HE CAN SAY
"I", instead of "My". "I feel the cold frightfully:
" "I dare not move hand or foot in a thunderstorm; and I simply
couldn't be alone." "This heat is knocking me all to pieces - I just
can't stand it!" - these are Generals. In these the patient expresses
himself. Remember, he is the sum of many lives, building up many tissues, and
organs of diverse function. Through the Generals the Dweller-in-the-House
speaks -
through the Mentals and Generals: - the Life which is the sum of the
lives, and something beyond that: - the Life "in which they live and move
and have their being"; and with whom, whatever their individual life and
vigour, they perish. Truly the whole is greater than its part. Surely it is
scientific to deal with the whole first, as a Whole?
But where your patient says
"My" instead of "I", there you have a Particular. "My
headache is awful in the house: the only thing for it is to go out and walk
about. It often drives me out of bed at 2 or 3 h., to walk the Common for
hours." (These are not exaggerated statements: we are giving you, all
through, actual words of actual patients; and the magic drug for the last was
Puls.).
But the Generals and the
Particulars may not only be quite different, but they may be flatly
contradictory in the same patient: so you see how imperative it is to get them
clearly, and to know what value to give to each. Arsenicum is worse from cold:
Ars. stands in the list of "predominantly cold remedies" in capitals.
And yet the headache of Arsenicum is better from cold. Ars. has been described
as only comfortable when "rolled in blankets up to his chin, with his head
out of the window." Lycopodium is a warm remedy in the main, and often
cannot stand heat: yet his stomach symptoms, which are a great feature of the
drug, are ameliorated by hot food and drinks. Of these the patient says not
"I", but "My", therefore they are particulars. He may say,
"I cannot stand heat", (a General of the highest importance, and one
of the most safe and useful of eliminating symptoms - if strongly marked !) -
"I cannot stand heat, but my indigestion" (a particular of the
greatest importance to the patient, and on which he lays the greatest stress)
"is better for hot food and drinks. Cold things always disagree with
me", (meaning his stomach). Again, Phosphorus stands in capitals as a very
cold person -
If you are to be a good prescriber, by the way, your drugs have got to
be people for you, with whims, fancies and terrrors; with tempers and
idiosyncrasies and characteristics: you have got to see them stalking about the
world, speaking and moving and halting, with the bodies-minds-souls of men. You
have got to travel with them in tram or train, and they will betray themselves,
buttoned up and shrinking together, or loose and jolly and open; fidgety,
restless, fearful; dull and inert; quarrelling for an open window, growing at
the draught with windows closed. You have got to dine with them, and they will
reveal themselves in their relation to food and drink, and in the mental
revelations such convivial moments of relaxation call forth. You may spot them,
standing for preference, or sinking always into the nearest seat; stoop
shouldered and drooping, or erect and full of "go"; depressed and
querulous; restless and anxious, as their deeply lined faces testify; smooth
and smug; dirty complexioned and careless of appearance; chalky faced and
flabby of superlative tissue: compact and hard as nails; fault-finding -
affectionate and mild - responsive to every wave of sentiment and emotion -
dull and indifferent. Look for them everywhere, and learn them, and they will
betray themselves at every turn; and you will often save yourselves hours of
solid work, by spotting them as they enter your consulting room.
5th PECULIARS. So, to
hark back... Phos.: a very cold person, but his stomach is > cold drinks.
When that is sick he craves for cold water, which is vomited, so soon as it
gets warm in the stomach.
This is a particular, true, but a priceless one, because it is peculiar
to Phos. And here we have a new term - a "PECULIAR" symptom, strongly
diagnostic of one drug. These peculiar symptoms are especially useful in acute
diseases where you are more likely to meet them, and where they often provide a
brilliant short-cut to the drug, saving time and toil. And see how these
peculiar unaccountable, contradictory symptoms help you - how unexpected they
are, and how diagnostic ! here you have the superlatively chilly Phosphorus:
and yet his pains are often of the most intensely-burning description: and
though, as a whole, he cannot tolerate cold, yet his sick stomach craves for
icy drinks, which it cannot even retain when they get warm ! Take your Generals
and Particulars mixed-up and awry and just-anyhow, and you might land in giving
such a patient Lycopodium; for both are worse for heat, and worse for cold;
only the Generals and Particulars are exactly reversed ! For Lycopodium is in
the main, intolerant of heat, which his stomach craves; while Phosphorus
detests the cold which his sick stomach demands with vehemence. See how
all-important it is to get your Generals and Particulars right! This is where
we fail, and blame Homœpathy.
6th Then, besides
Remember - THE MORE UNCOMMON A SYMPTOM IS, THE MORE VALUABLE: THE LESS
YOU CAN ACCOUNT FOR A SYMPTOM AND THE MORE INTENSELY PERSONAL IT IS, THE MORE
IMPORTANT. In inflammation, for instance, worse from pressure is what one would
expect, and of little value - so many drugs and most inflammations have it !
But better from pressure, under these circumstances, is priceless, and leads
you to a small group of drugs, such a Bry. Frequent micturition with a fibroid
impacted in the pelvis is not a symptom that will help you in working out your
case; it is a Common symptom and amply accounted for... and this leads one to
insist on the absolute necessity for correct diagnosis before you even open
your Repertory. Remember, the priceless symptoms for success are the strange,
the rare, the unaccountable ones; those that flatly contradict preconceived
ideas, and head off straight for a limited number of drugs.
6th
"ELIMINATING" SYMPTOMS
This is a new word, but expresses
what we all desire in repertorising, and what we have got be very cautious of
using too rigidly, lest we lose the remedy we are looking for.
Instances best reveal meanings.
Take one. Say your patient complains of dyspepsia, with burning pain in the
stomach, and the frequent vomiting of sour fluid. He pours you out particulars,
which he has at his finger-tips; since they are just the symptoms that impress
a man's memory, by intruding themselves on his consciousness in a very
realistic way. You jot them down till you have got the case as fully as most people
go, with all its modalities (i.e. the conditions as to heat and cold, movement
and rest, position, hours of day and night, relation to food and drink, etc.,
of the stomach condition complained of). You have assured yourself, by careful
examination, as to whether the trouble is likely to be organic or functional;
or whether some of the symptoms have got to be discounted, as secondary to some
gross lesion. And now it is your turn. You have to elicit the general symptoms
of your patient; you have got to switch him off the siding "my", and
on to the main line "I". And you now find that he cannot stand heat -
whatever his stomach may do; that he is ill if long out in the sun: that he
wants a cool room, prefers cold weather and a cold climate: that he never goes
near the fire: and you noticed when he came in that, though the weather was
cold, he was not buttoned up, or thickly clothed. It is not closeness or
stuffiness so much that affects him (you have got to be careful between these!)
but heat. He is one of Dr. G. Miller's "predominantly hot-remedy
people". There is an eliminating symptom for you! You know at once,
whatever his stomach condition may be (its particular symptoms might perhaps be
equally well-met by Ars., Phos., Nux-v. Lyc. Nat-m. or a host of others); but
with that temperament, that warm personality, it would be useless for deep and
curative work to think of giving him Ars., Phos., Nux or Sep. He is a hot
patient, and these are predominantly cold remedies. You can strike them out at
once. For even if one of them, aptly fitting the exact stomach symptoms only,
gave temporary relief to the immediate condition, the patient would relapse
again and again. It could not hold. It would act as a palliative, not a
curative drug. It might provide a temporary organ-stimulus: it could never be
the stimulus of the organism. And here you see well the difference between deep
and superficial work - between curative and palliative. The people who get
their honest triumphs in similars, and see at least brilliant temporary results
in superficial and acute conditions, and believe honestly that these are the
very best attainable by medicine, scout the idea of the lasting triumphs of the
simillimum. They know well, from years of experience, their own limitations;
and it seems to them outrageous that other people should make larger claims. As
a matter of fact, when you get the real simillimum, the odds are that, instead
of palliating the stomach condition, you will aggravate it a thousandfold - for
the moment; aggravate it, once and for all, to cure. And if you do not know
your work, you will think that you have got the wrong medicine and antidote or
change it; and your patient will be, so far as you are concerned, incurable.
But it may be your ignorance only that makes him so!
So now, down all the rubrics,
mental, general, and particular, you will carry that great eliminating symptom,
WORSE FROM HEAT, and ruthlessly cut out all the remedies that are chilly, and
therefore deeply help chilly people. None of these you need write down at all.
Using Dr. G. Miller's list, which we will give in a moment, you can go on to
any other General, and especially to any marked mental symptom, and often get a
pretty correct idea of the exact remedy before you ever start to tackle the particular
and immediate suffering for which the patient comes to you. Now supposing you
discover that he is liable to fits of depression, and yet cannot endure any
attempt at consolation; that he becomes a very fiend if anyone attempts to
cheer him up - even to enquire what is amiss: the people have learnt to let him
severely alone, when his moods are upon him; why, with these two important
symptoms alone, worse from heat, and worse from consolation, which have got to
be in equal type, remember, in the patient and in the drug, you have reduced
your area of search to Lil-t., Nat-m., and Plat. (for Lyc. and Merc. come
through the "< consolation test" in the lowest type only, which is
hardly good enough for such a marked loathing of consolation as this !) Or, if your
patient had been as predominantly chilly and worse for cold as this one was for
heat, and the aggravation from consolation test came out as strongly, you would
have found yourself at the start of your work with Ars., Bell., Calc-p., Ign.,
Nit-ac., Sep. and Sil., with two or three others to play with in brackets -
lowest type. If you can get such marked eliminating symptoms to begin with, see
what a comparatively small number of drugs you have to carry down through all
the rubrics, and how much easier and quicker it is to get your remedy, and how
much greater confidence you have in the result of your search. You will
generally find, as you work down, that one drug stands out more and more
pre-eminently: - it may not be in all the rubrics, but it has got to be in all
the important ones, i.e., those best marked in the patient, and of highest
grade. And presently you throw down your pen: you are convinced; and it is a
mere waste of time to go further.
Now take the same case and start,
instead, on the marked symptoms complained of by the patient - the Particulars,
and just see what work you have cut out for you! Begin with the rubric
Vomiting, and write it out for the last time, and see what it entails. And
write all the drugs, in all the types, lest you should miss any. Take his
particular symptoms, one by one, and write, and write, and write.
Vomiting, 162 drugs.
Vomiting water, 108 drugs.
Vomiting sour, 89 drugs.
Burning pain in the stomach, 186
drugs.
Pain in the stomach p.c., 110
drugs, etc.
It may be easily such a list, of
which this is but the merest beginning: - no wonder that people get
"Repertory funk!" - for remember that people are actually doing this,
at this moment, in all quarters of the world: for they are sending us their beautifully-neat,
conscientious and exhaustive work to show, as they ask for a better way: and it
is their cry for help that has caused this article to be compiled. Sheets and
sheets of paper you will cover. One that lies before us now has all the drugs
in forty-nine different rubrics, some if immense length, as Stools offensive,
Burning urine, Stools pasty, Yellow stools. Why, before you ever come down to
such symptoms, you should have three of four drugs only in hand: - and they are
symptoms of the lowest grade, and Common symptoms; hardly worth glancing
through for confirmation of the drug. Moreover, there is the possibility that
you may accidentally omit the very drug you want from some of the long lists
you are so slavishly copying: and the odds are, that when they are all
complete, without the aid of eliminating symptoms some half-a-dozen drugs will
come out pretty near one another when you count up at the end, and that your
travaux d'Hercule will leave you unconvinced and still in doubt.
A pathognomic symptom is the distinguishing symptom of a disease or
condition, e.g., the peculiar rash and odor of measles, the primary and
secondary fever of smallpox, etc.
A characteristic symptom is the distinguishing symptom of a drug. It is
to the drug what the pathognomic symptom is to the disease, e, g,, agg. of all
the symptoms by means of sleep under Lachesis.
Which Symptoms are Important?
Functional symptoms in an organ are of much less value than symptoms
which occur in other parts during the function of that organ. Burning pain in
the urethra, during or after micturition, is of little value in gonorrhoea, for
it is usually present; but pain in the testicles, thighs, or abdomen during or
after micturition, or symptoms of some other part not immediately concerned in
that function, would be more important. So, also, pain in the stomach after
eating, in indigestion, is not of as much value as vertigo or headache after
eating would be in the same attack.
Problems
confronting one when first attempting to prescribe homœopathically.
[Dr
Dr. Underhill has told you most graphically and humorously how he was
led into homœopathy so I will omit my initiation except to say that after
working at the “Allgemeine Krankenhaus” in
Before he was willing to take me as a pupil, he gave me a stiff
examination in ordinary medicine, including Anatomy, fractures, surgical
diagnosis, pathology, bacteriology, and chemistry, and gave me slides to
diagnose under the microscope, etc. He then asked me certain questions as to
what I thought life was about, why I went into the practice of medicine, what
were the chief duties of a physician
and so on. These questions perplexed me, as I did not then understand
their bearing on the philosophy of homœopathy. It was, "What do homœopaths
give for rheumatism?" Having read somewhat in homœopathic literature. I
answered that homœopaths do not give a remedy for rheumatism or for any disease
name or diagnosis (although, of course, certain remedies are more frequently
indicated in rheumatic conditions). They give a remedy on the symptoms of the
patient who has the disease, in other words on the reaction of the individual
in question to any given disease entity. This defines one
of the fundamental differences between the homœopathic approach and
regular medicine.
Until the physician's mind has compassed the differences between the
viewpoints of ordinary medical training and Homœopathy he cannot even begin to
prescribe homœopathically. Let me enumerate,
for clarity, wherein these differences lie.
1st as above mentioned, he must grasp the principle of individualization.
Modem medicine lays a good foundation for this through its interest in
endocrinology and psychiatry, but except for obvious glandular imbalances it
offers, as yet, no therapy commensurate with the refinements of
differentiation. What does individualization mean to the homœopath and how does
he arrive at it ? It involves a subsidiary new method of case-taking. After you
have your classical history, elicited largely by asking questions, you can
often make a diagnosis but rarely a homœopathic prescription. For the latter
you need to know the mental state of your patient, and what the homœopaths call
his "generals", which mean the things which apply to the patient as a
whole-his reaction to heat and cold, wet and dry weather and storms, motion,
position, food, etc.
You need to know how these same factors affect the specific complaints
of your patient, in other words the modalities of his particular disease
symptoms-whether his headache is better from hot or cold applications, from
motion or rest, from lying or walking, from pressure, or food, and at what time
of day it is worse. ("Modalities", in other words, mean aggravations
or ameliorations of specific symptoms, just as "generals" mean
aggravations and ameliorations of the patient as a whole). There is a fourth
type of thing that you must know about your patient in order to prescribe
homœopathically and that is his rare, peculiar, or characteristic particular
symptoms. These often appear trivial idiosyncrasies to the patient, things that
he has always had, or that no doctor to whom he has told them, has ever been
interested in. These often serve as Keynotes to guide to a remedy. But of what
use is all this additional information about your patient ? How does this
picture of his personality aid you ? You have individualized, but of what use
is such differentiation, if you have only a standard treatment for the
condition that you have diagnosed ?
2nd This brings us to the second great difference between
homœopathy and regular medicine. The law on which homœopathy is based, or, if
you prefer, the hypothesis, is to be found in the statement of Hippocrates,
"similia similibus curantur." which Hahnemann revived and amplified.
Dr. Sterns has told you how Hahnemann came to apply this law and made the first
so-called "proving" of quinine.
A "proving", in the homœopathic sense, is experimenting with a
drug in minute doses on a relatively healthy human being. The record of
symptoms so produced, on a large number of provers of different ages and sexes,
constitutes the basis of our homœopathic materia medica. The object of proving
a drug is to delineate the drug personality.
Each of our remedies is to us a living individual, they are like friends
whom one recognizes whenever seen, not only by their grand characteristics but
also by their mannerisms and tricks. We now have on the one hand, the drug
personalities, and on the other the picture of our patient in his present
state. It follows, if like cures like that we must match pictures and fit the
personality of a drug to our patient, administer it, and watch the results.
After one has grasped this ingenious theory and learned to put it into
practice, it remains only to see it work. I, for one, being a natural septic,
was slow to believe that evidence of my senses. Could the astonishing
improvements and cures have been coincidence, or suggestion, or faulty
diagnosis ?
There are certain controls which one can use. Put the patient on the
proper regimen including diet, etc., and see what that alone does for your condition.
Then give Placebo, with your best manner. In my experience, in nine cases out
of ten, the patient will report no progress. When they are discouraged by this
unsuccessful first prescription, give them the remedy you have chosen, the
simillimum. If you feel reasonably certain that the drug-picture fits your
patient ; and you have the simillimum, in most cases you will see a swift and
beautiful result. But these are not the only possible methods of control. There
are laws of remedy action which are contrary to anything you could expect in an
untreated case. When you see these, you know that your remedy is taking hold.
3rd? They were formulated by Constantine Hering, one of the
pioneers of Homœopathy in this country, and are as follows: The curative remedy
acts from within outward, from above downward, and in the reverse order of the
symptoms.
Take, as an illustration, a case of rheumatic fever in which, after the
customary salicylate dosing, the joints appear to have cleared up but a heart
condition develops. Give such a patient the similar remedy and he will complain
that his joints are worse again, but he himself feels better and you find that
his heart is clearing up. You explain to him that the remedy is working from
within outward, the more vital organ, the heart, is getting well first, and the
peripheral organs, the joints, are again involved. Give him nothing but
Placebo. Shortly he will tell you that his shoulders and wrists are clearing up
but that the pain is now in his knees or ankles. Again you see the law of cure
in action, from above downward, and you wait. You observe that his symptoms are
disappearing in the reverse order of their appearance, the heart condition
which came last, going first. If you trust your remedy under these conditions,
your patient will make a real recovery without the annoying recurrences. (If,
on the contrary, you found that the joints in the lower extremities cleared up
and those of the upper extremities became involved, you would know you were on
the wrong track and had not found the simillimum).
One of the knottiest problems for the beginner is the different concept
of pathology and bacteriology. Homœopaths accept the facts of these branches of
medicine. The difference lies in the interpretation. Pathology is an end result
of some morbid process. The homœopath is not nearly as interested in the
diseased tonsil, the hæmorrhoid, the ovarian cyst, the cancer, the tapeworm, or
the psoriasis, as he is in the constitutional dyscrasia behind these. He is not
eager to remove the ultimates of disease at once, but rather to cure the
underlying cause. In the course of this cure the ultimate will often disappear,
as in the case of diseased cervical glands or fibroids. If not, it can be
removed when it has become merely a foreign body, and when the constitution is
so changed that it will not ultimate itself in further pathology in a more deep
seated organ. Similarly one is taught to consider that bacteria cause disease.
The homœopath is more interested in the individual's susceptibility,
than in the bacteria themselves. Instead of poisoning the malarial plasmodia
with quinine or the syphilitic spirochætæ with salvarsan, the homœopath prefers
to stimulate the body to make itself uninhabitable for these organisms, and he
does this by means of the similar remedy. To give another instance, instead of
killing off head lice with delphinium and leaving the patient susceptible to
further invasions, the homœopath gives chronic constitutional remedy which
removes the susceptibility and the lice seek better pasturage.
4th stumbling-block for the medical mind is the question of
suppression. Discharges and eruptions are ordinarily classed with pathology as
something to be gotten rid of by local measures. We are taught
to use argyrol in coryza, to paint cervices with mercurochrome in
leucorrhœa, to stop a gonorrhœal discharge with protargol, to check a diarrhœa
with opium or bismuth, to clear up skin eruptions with ammoniated mercury or
sulphur ointment or other applications. The homœopath holds that this is
suppression, and not cure, that these outward manifestations ate not primarily
local but an expression of deep disease, the body trying to throw off
impurities. They have watched the incidence of more deep-seated troubles
following such "suppression". The chronic constitutional homœopathic
remedy given to a case which has been so treated, will offer bring back the
original eruption or discharge with concomitant relief of recent grave symptoms
and ultimate clearing up from within of the original discharge or eruption. Let
me illustrate with a case from my practice recently.
A women of 45, came to see me for suicidal depression, for which she
could give no emotional cause. She dated her mental symptoms definitely from
the time when she had had a foul, lumpy, green leucorrhœa "cured" by
local vaginal applications, a few months before. I gave her a dose of Sepia (a
remedy made from cuttlefish ink) on her mental symptoms. A week later she
returned exuberant, all the depression for which she had been doctoring being
gone, and said, "By the way, doctor. I have that awful discharge back
again, just as it was before". I was delighted, warned her against
suppressing it a second time, and gave Placebo. The discharge has since
lessened and improved in character and she continues, as her husband says, a
changed woman. So much for the fundamental differences.
Another problem which confronted me was whether the homœopathic remedy
could influence definite chronic pathology. A girl of 19 came to me for severe
intermenstrual bleeding. On examination I found a nodular fibroid bigger than
my fist. A well-known
A further difficulty I experienced was in believing the current
statement that homœopathic remedies can do no harm. THEY CAN !
Another problem which one frequently meets in general practice is that
of prophylaxis. Strict homœopaths believe that vaccines and inoculations are
harmful. It took considerable experience for me to be convinced that the
chronic constitutional remedy is the best prophylactic. The whole subject of
the chronic constitutional remedy is a fascinating one, but beyond the scope of
this paper.
As a last problem comes the practical one which is such a
stumbling-block to students, as to whether one can make a living on homœopathic
general practice. Certainty more than half of my patients were not believing in
Homœopathy, many of them dead against it, but I have found that by up-to-date
examination and laboratory procedures, by the actual accomplishment of the
remedies, and by adroitly "selling" to the patient the principles of
homœopathy without the name, they are intrigued, send you their friends, and
become staunch believers in the method.
To all of the puzzling problems outlined above, a satisfactory solution
can be found, if one is willing to do the hard work involved in learning enough
to get results. I am completely "sold" to Homœopathy. When I fail I
know that the failure is mine and not homeopathy's and when I can see a similar
remedy for a case, I have, even before giving it, a perfect certainty that good
results will be forthcoming.
Vorwort/Suchen Zeichen/Abkürzungen Impressum