Vitaminen Anhängsel
‡
Folgendes hat anthroposofische Einschlüsse ‡
Frei nach: Guenther Wachsmuth, Ph.D.
It was the
study of agriculture that first led
me to examine the problems connected
with vitamins, but it soon
became clear that these problems
are also of profound concern to medicine.
What do we
really know about vitamins? We cannot begin
to answer this question unless we understand that
one of the most important steps in modern science has been the tendency
to look at forces rather than at matter or materials. We
cannot review atomic theory here,
but we must
be aware of the revolutions caused by the
discovery of radioactive phenomena. It was thought at first that radiation occurred only in a few minerals, but
gradually it was perceived that there was radiation almost everywhere - in soil, rainwater, air, snow, plants,
animals, humans. Many years ago,
in a book on radioactivity,
Meyer & Schweidler wrote,
"We should perhaps remember that the human organism continually takes in +/- electrons from the environment,
then gives them out again under the influence
of light and heat. In the near future we
may be able
to speak of a +/-electronic
circulation from the environment into humans and back out again, with effects
on life that we have no inkling of now."
Since then
we have learned
that the effects of various rays on (and from) living organisms are much more
intense than was dreamed of earlier. Experiments with vitamins have
shown that organisms not only
react strongly to such rays (radioactive, ultraviolet, plain light, etc.) but can also store
them and give them out again.
The most
important stages in prevailing scientific attitudes were more or less
as follows: At the end of the 1800’s and the beginning of the 20th century, Liebig reigned supreme, and the chemical aspects of matter were regarded as decisive. All organisms and nutrients were seen as combinations of various chemical elements. If any
chemical "building-stone"
was missing, it could be replaced;
from which came the chemical
fertilizer industry that is now
so dominant in agriculture.
Then there
was a period that could be called
the bacteriological era, when the
emphasis was on the good
and evil wrought by bacteria. Bacterial
cultures of all kinds were made and at the same time milk was sterilized at high temperatures
to kill off bacteria. Soon it was perceived, however, that this
also killed most of the nutritional value.
On the assumption
that the nourishment of plants depends entirely on their chemical composition and that these chemicals could be produced
synthetically, Bunge experimented with feeding "artificial food" to mice. The results were
described by Weitzel 1, "The animals declined when fed purified
albumen, fat, lactose, and salts, whereas they flourished
when given milk“. Weitzel continues, "A gap was appearing. At first no one could
explain why a theoretically adequate collection of purified nutrients supposedly containing everything needed for life, did not suffice
to keep the animals healthy. Observation showed that young
animals were inhibited in their growth, while adults suffered
deficiencies, loss of weight, and death without any apparent
cause."
The plain
fact was that when the prevailing
scientific theories were taken seriously
and converted into actual practice, the animals died.
The missing 'something', which was unknown but simply
had to be contained somewhere in the plants, was now thought to reside in the "vitamins." This is why they
play such a large role in
modern thinking about nutrition and agriculture. We must repeat
that nobody really knows anything
about what vitamins really are. They are
a name for something unknown. Weitzel says this
clearly, "Scientists were searching for a definite chemical body, whereas the
word vitamin is now used
for a concert of harmoniously
cooperating substances. The substances have not yet
been isolated far enough to determine their chemical and physical properties“.
We will not
go further into modern vitamin theories here. Our own position
has for decades been that the
missing factors do not have a chemical
constituency. They depend on the reciprocal
action of the living formative forces (life-principle) both of the person taking
in food and plant that makes up the food.
The latest
research confirms that the mysterious
factors, whose presence leads to health and whose absence is fatal, are not of a chemical
nature. They are forces. Let us
give some examples.
The puzzling
effect of vitamins can be replaced
by light. Conversely, where there is
little or no light, vitamins can replace
it. Weitzel says: "The inhabitants of polar regions have a diet rich in Vitamin A. This compensates for the lack of sunlight. In areas where there is
plenty of sunlight, the diet can
be poor in vitamins without any symptoms of rickets showing up. Here the light has taken over the
necessary function. We have already
shown that animals exposed to light can flourish on a vitamin poor diet.
Nevertheless it sounds like a fairy
tale when scientists report that non-light irradiated animals, when put in the
same cage with those exposed
to light, also escaped disease.
We have to conclude that rays
are the most
efficacious principle which one animal
can transmit to another."
Astonishingly, it
has also been experimentally
demonstrated, that plant
and animal products can preserve light radiation effects. Weitzel says, "Milk, eggs, and many other foods can
be used as carriers of these light rays. Exposing olive oil to radiation
for half an hour produced effects that were still noticeable when the oil had
been stored in closed bottles in a dark place for
eleven months“. Hess, Kugelmass, and Steenbock were driven to the remarkable
conclusion (fully compatible with the life-principle) that "vitamins" originate in radiation phenomena.
We could cite many more examples to show that the latest research corroborates what R.S. said decades ago about the forces dwelling in all living things. He called them the "etheric formative forces" and demonstrated that they operate in countless phenomena.
Vorwort/Suchen Zeichen/Abkürzungen Impressum