Immunsystem
https://www.spektrum.de/news/immunsystem-warum-kinder-doppelt-vor-covid-19-geschuetzt-sind/1912819?utm_source=pocket-newtab-global-de-DE
https://www.spektrum.de/podcast/spektrum-podcast-was-dem-immunsystem-gut-tut-und-was-ihm-schadet/1968871?utm_source=pocket-newtab-global-de-DE
https://www.spektrum.de/news/koerperabwehr-was-staerkt-das-immunsystem/1944655#Echobox=1645341975?utm_source=pocket-newtab-global-de-DE
https://www.spektrum.de/news/neuroimmunologie-waechter-des-gehirns/2037286?utm_source=pocket-newtab-global-de-DE
https://www.nationalgeographic.de/wissenschaft/2023/04/zerstoert-zu-viel-salz-unser-immunsystem?utm_source=pocket-newtab-global-de-DE
Vergleich: Siehe: Nosoden allgemein + Borreliose + Neurodermitis
+ Allergie + Anhängsel (Prof. Dr. Andreas
Michalsen/Jürgen Langenbach/Robert Zieve/Jacquelyn Wilson/Lane M. Badger) + Anhang
2 (Melanie Weiner/Bertram von Zabern/Jacquelyn Wilson) + Immunsystem
Anhang 3 (Tanja Hofmann:
Neurodermitis) + Lack of reaction + Convalescence/Rekonvaleszenz
+ Infektion
+ Adaptogen 6 + Chemische Zusammensetzung und antimikrobielle Eigenschaften der ätherischen Öle von Leptospermum scoparium J.R.
et G. Forst. und anderer Teebaumöle der Gattungen Kunzea, Leptospermum und Melaleuca
unter besonderer Berücksichtigung
von Handelsölen + Krieg + Salz + Immunsystem (https://web.de/magazine/wissen/natur-umwelt/pizza-ausloest-wirkt-salz-koerper-35833964)
Immune Dysfunction, Worms in Humans depress the immune system by decreasing
immunoglobulin A.
[Interview: Edda Grabar]
ZEIT: Wie stützt eine Diät das Immunsystem?
Schieffer: Die Darmflora reagiert bei allen Entzündungen mit. Sie ist für die Balance des Immunsystems verantwortlich. Eine Diät, die auf bestimmte Stoffe verzichtet,
hilft dabei, eine gestörte Balance wiederherzustellen.
[Couchman]
Immune system:
An intricate
complex of interrelated cellular, molecular and genetic components, which
provides a defence (immune response) against foreign organisms
or substances and aberrant native
cells (Stedman’s, 2005)
[Ajit Kulkarni]
The following conditions can weaken the immune system.
Cancer or its treatment
(surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy).
Immuno-suppressive therapies
being employed for auto-immune diseases and other medical conditions
Systemic steroid therapy
Chronic use of antibiotics
Tuberculosis and its treatment
with chemotherapy
Surgeries of the vital organs such
as heart, brain, liver, spleen, kidneys etc.
Repeated surgeries
Chronic debilitating diseases
like multiple sclerosis, interstitial fibrosis of the lungs etc.
Chronic addictions such as
drug substance abuse, alcoholism, cocaine, cannabis (marijuana), hashish,
tobacco, opioids (heroine), prescription drugs (sedatives,
hypnotics,, anxiolytics,
tranquilizers, sleeping pills), amphetamines, hallucinogens, inhalants,
phencyclidine, etc.
The infection that might be trivial to a healthy person can be
debilitating and potentially life-threatening for the vulnerable.
Wurmkur gegen Immunerkrankungen Therapie mit Ekelfaktor
[Christine Westerhaus]
Ferrum phosphoricum
Kalium sulphuricum
Magnesium phosphoricum
Separat einnehmen
[Christine Westerhaus]
Wurmkur gegen Immunerkrankungen Therapie mit EkelfaktorS
[Riffreporter]
Impfungen verändern auch das unspezifische Immunsystem
Die Anregung des angeborenen Immunsystems könne in den zuständigen Zellen „eine epigenetische Narbe“ hinterlassen, schreibt der Bonner Immunologe Mihai Netea gemeinsam mit seinem Mailänder Kollegen Alberto Mantovani im angesehenen New England Journal of Medicine. Dabei handele es sich um ein Muster von nebengenetischen Strukturen, die gezielt die Aktivierbarkeit solcher Gene verstärken oder erleichtern, die den Zellen bei der Bekämpfung aller möglichen Arten von Krankheitserregern helfen. Klar, dass auch SARS-CoV-2-Viren einem Menschen mit einer solchen epigenetischen Grundausstattung weniger leicht etwas anhaben dürften als Anderen.
Vor diesem Hintergrund macht es laut Netea und Mantovani durchaus Sinn, dass derzeit in mehreren Studien untersucht wird, ob eine BCG-Impfung gegen Covid-19 helfen könne. Netea selbst ist an zweien dieser Studien beteiligt. Für eine allgemeine Empfehlung sei es dennoch zu früh, geben sich die Autoren vorsichtig. Noch müsse man die endgültigen Resultate abwarten. „Der Einsatz von BCG zur Prophylaxe oder Behandlung von Covid-19 außerhalb einer kontrollierten medizinischen Studie ist nicht zu empfehlen“, lautet das Fazit.
Doch nicht immer ist ein besonders aktives Immunsystem gut für Corona-Patient*innen. Manchmal kommt es als Reaktion auf den Krankheitserreger zu einer übermäßigen Ausschüttung von Zytokinen genannten Botenstoffen, die Entzündungsreaktionen anstoßen. Startet ein solcher Zytokinsturm, leiden eine Menge innerer Organe, und Covid-19 nimmt einen gefährlichen Verlauf. Das Robert Koch-Institut spricht in diesem Fall von der „späten, hyperinflammatorischen Erkrankungsphase“. Das Immunsystem der Patient*innen schießt dann sozusagen über sein Ziel hinaus.
Nicht zuletzt um diese fatale Überreaktion zu bekämpfen erhalten Covid-19-Patient*innen, die zusätzlichen Sauerstoff verabreicht bekommen oder künstlich beatmet werden müssen, häufig das Medikament Dexamethason – so zum Beispiel unlängst auch der US-Präsident Donald Trump. Es simuliert eine allgemeine Stressreaktion, unterdrückt so das Immunsystem und dämpft damit auch den Sturm der Entzündungsboten.
Nun gibt es schlüssige Indizien, dass bei Menschen mit einem hohen Risiko für bedrohliche Covid-19-Verläufe die epigenetische Regulation solcher Gene in eine ungünstige Richtung verändert ist, die die Ausschüttung der Zytokine überwachen. Das hätte zur Folge, dass die Einen sehr viel eher zum Zytokinsturm neigen als die Anderen.
[Sindisiwe Sthembile Mazibuko]
2.2 Physiology of sleep
The mechanism of sleep-wake cycle, which consists of about 8 hours of
nocturnal sleep and 16 hours of wakefulness during the day in humans,
controlled by the combination of sleep homeostasis and circadian rhythms
(National sleep foundation, 2006).
Homeostasis controls the amount of sleep at night and maintains the
blood pressure, body temperature and acid-base balance at a steady state. When
we wake up, the homeostatic drive for sleep accumulates to reach its maximum in
the late evening when the majority fall asleep. When we are awake, blood levels
of adenosine increases and results in a growing need for sleep that become less
resistible over time. Adenosine receptors can be blocked by caffeine preventing
the need of feeling sleepy, which is where sleep is lost. The body will start
to demand that makeup of lost sleep for each hour which results in a very
negative effect on daytime performance, thinking and mood (National sleep
foundation, 2006).
Circadian rhythms are driven by the brain’s biological clock which
consists of group of neurons in the hypothalamus (suprachiasmatic nucleus). The
internal 24 hour rhythms are synchronized to the external physical environment
and social/work schedules, human light is the strongest synchronizing agent as
the light and darkness are external signals that set the biological clock and
determine when do we wake up or go to sleep (National sleep foundation, 2006).
Homeostatic systems make us fall asleep as time goes on regardless of
whether its night or during the day, while the circadian rhythms keep us awake
during the day and make us go to sleep as soon as it becomes dark. When
circadian rhythms are disrupted; mental and physical performance is diminished
(National sleep foundation, 2006).
There are two types of sleep, non-rapid eye movement (NREM) and rapid
eye movement (REM) (National sleep foundation, 2006).
[Peter Alex]
Kollektive Botschaft
Die Entdeckung der Borrelien war ein wichtiger Schritt, aber nicht der letzt Notwendige für das Verständnis des dynamischen und weltweiten Phänomens „Borreliose“. Vorerst dürfen wir hypothetisch annehmen, dass die Borrelien-Infektion etwas mit unserer Lebensweise zu tun hat, nämlich mit einem Ungleichgewicht in unserer sozialen, emotionalen, psychischen oder geistigen Hygiene. Das führt dazu, dass diese Kleinlebewesen es einfach haben, sich mit unserem System zu verbinden und unseren genetischen Code zu „manipulieren“. Jede Krankheit, auch jede epidemische, hat Entsprechungen auf anderen Ebenen - sozusagen eine kollektive Botschaft bzw. ein Signal an die betroffene Menschengruppe, dass etwas nicht stimmt.
Vielfach gelten Erkrankungen solchen Umfangs wie das epidemische Auftreten von Borreliose lediglich als Feind, der vernichtet werden muss. In diesem Rahmen liegt
die höhere Bedeutung einer infektiösen Erkrankung bestenfalls darin, sie als Feld für die Entwicklung neuer Leben abtötender Substanzen („Anti-Biotika“) zu betrachten.
Aus ganzheitsmedizinischer Sicht drängt sich hingegen immer die Frage auf, wohin uns die Krankheit führen, was sie uns lehren will. Eine mögliche Herangehensweise
ist die Betrachtung des Wesens der Borreliose, die wiederum vom Wesen einer bestimmten homöopathischen Arznei ausgeht, die in chronischen Borreliose-Fällen häufig erfolgreich verordnet wurde:
Aur-ars. Es ist historisch belegt, dass Goldarsenit einen medizinischen Bezug zur Geschlechtskrankheit Syphilis hat, wurde es doch Anfang des 19. Jahrhunderts in die Medizin als Alternative zur üblichen Quecksilberbehandlung eingeführt, um Tuberkulose- und Syphiliskranke zu heilen. Will man den Weg der Heilung einer Borreliose-Infektion durch Aur-ars. verstehen, führt der Weg über das Periodensystem, das die Elemente genau aufschlüsselt. Dr. Jan Scholten entwickelte in den 1990er-Jahren ein System, mit dem das Wesen der chemischen Elemente des Periodensystems in Bezug zur krank machenden Situation im Leben eines Menschen definiert werden kann. Dadurch wurde es möglich, bestimmte Kombinationen von Elementen -wie zum Beispiel Gold und Arsen- vorherzusagen, die für genau diesen Menschen oder besser diese Menschengruppe in homöopathischem Sinn wirksam sein können, weil ihre Merkmale dem Leiden ähnlich sind (Simile-Prinzip). Mit dieser sogenannten Gruppenanalyse (benannt nach den Gruppen des Periodensystems der Elemente) können wir theoretisch bei einer Kollektivkrankheit Rückschlüsse auf die krank machende Situation bei der betroffenen Bevölkerungsgruppe ziehen.
Singen wirkt Schmerz lindernd, stärkt Immunsystem, fördert Oxytocin.
[Dr Elizabeth Wright Hubbard]
It took considerable experience for me to be convinced that the chronic
constitutional remedy is the best prophylactic.
Häute und Lymphsystem - Bastionen der Immunkraft
Verschiedene Instanzen der
Immunabwehr: ein anaerob-archaisches und ein aerob-intelligentes Immunsystem.
Die Heilung chronischer Krankheiten ist nur dann rückfallfrei, wenn die
Körperhaut durch Schwitzen und Fiebern wieder über ihre physiologische
Immunabwehr verfügt.
Die Konflikte der verschiedenen Häute, des Lymphsystems und der Milz zeigen
interessante Ähnlichkeiten.
Defensine: in allen tierischen Organismen/höheren Pflanzen. Dienen der
Abwehr von mikrobiellen Erregern: Bakterien/Pilzen/Toxinen. In Säugetieren findet man sie zahlreich auf
Haut- und Schleimhautoberflächen. Während einer Entzündungsreaktion steigt die
körpereigene Produktion der Defensine an. Adaptogen
Unterscheidet Fremdartiges von Eigenem
Abweichung: Allergie. = Abwehr von Fremdartiges
Autoimmunerkrankung. = Intoleranz von Eigenem
Tumoren = Toleranz von zum Fremdes entartetem Eigenem
Enzymen = Eiweiß/ohne Enzymen gibt es keinen Stoffwechsel/= Teil des Immunabwehrsystems
Hilfsorganen: Flimmerhaaren in Nase/Bronchien
Mundschleimhaut produziert Lysozym
Magen produziert Säure
Lymphatische Organe im Darm produzieren Lymphozyten
Haut: Säureschutz durch Fett + Wassergemisch
Leber
Im Darm. befindet sich ein großes Teil des Immunsystems.
[Olaf Rippe]
Aus Meteoreisen schmiedet man noch heute magische Waffen gegen Geister und Dämonen. Es ist eines der besten Mittel zur Erhöhung der Widerstandskraft gegen Infektionen.
Immune Dysfunction, Worms in Humans depress the immune system by
decreasing immunoglobulin A.
Immunsystem produziert Antigenen (es gibt Millionen Sorten/unentwegt werden Stoffen/Bakterien/Viren im Blut mit diesen Antigenen verglichen)
Lymphozyten hergestellt aus Stammzellen von Rückenmark
Fresszellen (Monozyten/Makrophagen) verdauen Bakterien/krebsverdächtige Zellen
B-Zellen produzieren Antikörper/hergestellt in Lymphknoten
T-Zellen produzieren Immunbotenstoffen/hergestellt von Thymusdrüse
T-Killerzellen vernichten Tumorzellen
T-Helferzellen produzieren Antikörper
T-Suppressorzellen grenzen Immunreaktion ab
Rote/weiße Blutkörperchen hergestellt in Knochenmark.
Colibri. amazilia = Kolibri blood of the
humming-bird contains more erythrocytes than any other bird.
Geschwächte Widerstandskräfte (AIDS/Krebs)
Quelle: Apotheke zum weißen Engel. Mag. pharm. Leisser KG, Hauptplatz 29, 2070 Retz: Viele Impfstoffen
Immunglobulin A (IgA) wird auf allen Schleimhäuten der Atemwege, der Augen, des Magen-Darm-Trakts, des Urogenitaltrakts sowie über spezielle Drüsen rund um die Brustwarze von Müttern sezerniert und schützt dort vor Pathogenen (auch das Neugeborene). Sezerniertes IgA kommt in Form von Homodimeren vor; die beiden Anteile
sind durch das Joining-Peptide verbunden.
Immunglobulin G: Immunglobulin vom Menschen
Immunglobulin humanum anti D
The immune system and its cells
Mast cells are normally found within the dermis. On exposure to an
allergen mast cells are responsible for histamine release by releasing
histamine containing granules when activated by immunoglobulin
E IgE). The histamine released by the mast cells results in initial
reddening of the skin and swelling at the site of the allergen exposure (Kumar
and Clark, 2009). Some of the granules released by mast cells may contain
natural proteases which may cause tissue damage and cleavage of the complement
components (Kumar et al., 2007).
Langerhans cells are dendritic cells which are derived from bone marrow
and are continuously circulating between the epidermis and its local lymph
nodes. The primary function of Langerhans cells is to present foreign antigens
to the lymphocytes in an effective manner (Davidsons, 2006). Antigen
presentation occurs when an antigen-glycoprotein combination appears in a cell
membrane which has the capability of activating T cells. These glycoproteins
are known as major histocompatibility complex (MHC) proteins. Langerhans cell
are non-phagocytic and are only present in the membranes of antigen presenting
cells and lymphocytes (Martini, 2004).
Keratinocytes are the most abundant cells in the epidermis and they
secrete a variety of cytokines in response to certain stimuli, as occurs in
some skin diseases, such as atopic dermatitis. They also produce antimicrobial
peptides which are induced by skin inflammation, and these act against
pathogens. It is thought that a deficiency in peptides may make patients with
atopic dermatitis more susceptible to infection (Kumar and Clark, 2009).
T-lymphocytes are white blood cells which are generated from precursors
in the bone marrow, from where they then migrate to the thymus gland (Kumar and
Clark, 2009).
T-lymphocytes
‡ [Henry N. Williams]
The
"Immune System" is that part of us which distinguishes what is us and
what is not. The skin and mucous membranes protect us from our environment but
infectious agents, harmful chemicals and cancer cells that develop in our otherwise
normal body cells need to be combated and eliminated. This our immune system
does through white blood cells and special protein molecules of the immune
system. Our immune system can be seen as having two parts - the cellular and
the humoral (fluid).
The
cellular part is composed of:
Phagocytes
(eater cells). They are of two chief types. Neurophiles act quickly and tend to
be short lived.
They make
up the majority of the white blood cells (WBC) in a blood count. Macrophages
(big eaters) are slower and clean up any invading bacteria and viruses, and the
debris left by the neurophile.
I-a-positive
macrophages release enzymes to the lymphocytes. These are of two kinds. One is
the "T cell", largely derived from the thymus gland, which rids the
body of diseased or abnormal cells, distinguishing them from normal body cells.
It can also stimulate the production of other cells like itself when the need
arises,
as well as
stimulate macrophages with a special protein called "interferon."
Other chemicals released by the
T-helper
cells are called "lymphokines:" which regulate the action of the
other major kind of lymphocyte,
the
"B cell," which the body produces to eliminate viruses and debris
outside of our body cells.
The
macrophages, and T cells also produce antibodies by stimulating the B cells to
become plasma cells.
The eleven
proteins thus produced are called "complement" and they supplement as
"humoral (fluid) immunity" the work of the "cellular
immunity" discussed above.
Allergic
reactions (hay fever, asthma, skin rashes and hives) occur when the immune
system overreacts to usually harmless substances such as grass pollen or house
dust. Auto-immune disorders occur when the immune system reacts to normal body
cells as if they were foreign.
Lack of
one or more components of the immune system results in Immune-deficiency
Disorders. These can be inherited or acquired through infections or other
illnesses, or as a side effect of certain drug treatments.
The HIV
virus is one such infectious agent which gradually produces the Acquired
Immune-deficiency Syndrome
of AIDS.
It frequently takes up to ten years after contracting this virus before full
blown AIDS develops.
It is
during that interim that building up our vitality could have a beneficial
effect.
Question:
Thanks, Dr. Williams for the help you have given me in the past. I appreciate
your advice and so
we hope
the paper will be of help also. We use homeopathic or herbal medicines every
opportunity. Is there anything that can help Lupus sufferers (Systemic lupus,
Linear scleroderma) if they cannot take steroids such
as
Prednisone and Plaquanal?
Answer:
Lupus in various forms, and scleroderma have been successfully treated by
homeopathic practitioners
but again it is not a
matter of one medicine for a diagnosis but tailoring the medicine to the
patient. Therefore a person with either of these conditions should consult a
practicing homeopathic physician.
Überreaktion Sympathisches Nervensystem
erzeugt Diabetes/Bluthochdruck/Autoimmunkrankheit
Question:
What would you say were the keys that changed the way you practice medicine?
Answer:
The anthroposophical approach to health and illness give the physician a
different attitude the patient and her/his problems. We recognize not only the
uniqueness of each individual and situation (as do homeopathic practitioners)
but seeing in the illness an attempt on the part of the individuality of the
patient to make a change. Of course fever stimulates the immune system and is
therefore good but requires the oversight of the physician to be sure that it
is not life endangering (one can have too much of a good thing). Thoughtful
talks with patients may help them sense what changes in life style and
attitudes are necessary. It is a rare physician who can or should tell a
patient what to do---patients must come to it themselves. It reminds me of the
old adage: 'anyone changed against their will is of the same opinion still.'
We,
anthroposophists, believe in the overseeing closeness of the spiritual world to
each individual and see in what happens to us a divine guidance toward our
individual betterment (the Law of Karma). We also believe in the reality of
reincarnation (repeated earth lives as human beings). These beliefs form a
backdrop against which we see the patient and their problem.
We tend to
give far less medicine than other physicians who see every illness as an
invasion from outside; alien forces that must be repulsed with strong measures.
It is a philosophy of illness based on fear, and all illnesses are deemed
adversarial, and not seen as an attempt on the part of the individual to find a
more harmonious life and work towards a spiritual goal, albeit perhaps an
unconscious one.
Epidemic
illnesses are harder to see in this way. But here too the same principles
apply. As physicians we have to see the susceptibility to disease as an
imbalance which is grasped by our physical-self to bring us along our spiritual
path.
Immunizations
are another trial for the anthroposophically oriented physician. If illnesses
are attempts, or windows of opportunity, for the self to bring a better balance
or bring us further along our spiritual path, then preventing illness is gross
interference with the karma of the patient (and our own). Each physician may
have 'exceptions.' Mine is the tetanus toxoid. After seeing tetanus in
contaminated wounds I see the toxoid, with a booster shot every ten years as
preferable to having antitoxin in emergency situations. After having a young
patient develop a myologinous leukemic picture after a `booster' shot of
Diphtheria/ Pertussis/Tetanus (DPT), I realize the negative aspect of
immunization (even after we were able to bring his blood picture back to normal
and the patient back to health).
We end up
with more questions than answers in these times. The physician must decide each
case on its own factors. Wide is the gate and broad the path for most
physicians who do not question the current 'wisdom' of immunization. But
Sophia's gate is small and her path narrow and circuitous. ‡
Hemmend: Steroiden
Erhöhte Eisenwerten in Laborbericht kann Tb./HIV/Candida/Haemochromatose/Krebs anzeigen/Immunsystem = geschwächt. Anämie kann Körper dazu bringen
Mikroorganismen (= Krankheitserreger) Eisen zu entziehen.
Fördernd Bewegung/genug Schlaf (wird reguliert in Schlafphase III + IV)/gesunde Ernährung/Lachen
Kneippische Anwendungen
Bierhefe/Maitake (regacan Fa. Sy Cyl)
Singen wirkt Schmerzlindernd, stärkt Immunsystem, fördert Oxytocin
Interferone sind körpereigene Abwehrstoffe
Mensch reagiert mit T-Helferzellen des Typ 2 fälschlich auf Substanzen (wie Milbekot) wie auf Bakterien/Viren was Entzündungen verursacht/gesunder Mensch reagiert
mit T-Helferzellen des Type 1. um Entzündungen zu hemmen. Kleinkinder lernen durch Kinderkrankheiten die T-Helferzellen richtig einzusetzen. Bei geimpfte/weniger
als 6 Monaten gestillte Kinder entsteht ein Überschuss an T-Helferzellen des Typ 2. die nicht genutzt und danach fehl gesteuert werden. Immunsystem, muss wie alle Funktionen im Mensch, trainiert werden, das Immunsystem braucht „sparring“ Partner/wird anders „paranoid“ und reagiert allergisch.
Tierisches hemmt Wärme.
Reaktionsmangel:
Hals/Rachen: Diph. Tub-a. VAB. Yers.
Haut: Anthraci. VAB. Vacc.
Lungen: Tub-a. Tub. VAB.
Urinwegen: Coli. Med.
Darmnosoden: Coli. Enterococcinum. Infl. Paratyphus. Yers.
Immunsystem fördernde Wirkung haben u.a.:
Asparagus racemosus fördert Östrogene Asparagales. Wechseljahren.
Calen. [Matthew Wood]
Immergrüne Gewächse die Lebenskraft und das Immunsystem stärken.
Emblica
officinalis.o. Phyllanthus emblica Pankreas Malphigiales.
Ferr-si.
Kombucha.x
Phyllantus amarus. Leber
Vanad-met. [J.H. Clarke] Increases hemoglobin that combines its oxygen with toxins
and destroys their virulence. Stimulates phagocytes.
Degenerative conditions of arteries
and liver. Arteriosclerosis. Fatty heart. In tuberculosis, chlorosis,
neuresthenia, it increased appetite, strength and weight.
Zinc-met. = Teil vieler Enzymen
Schema shows transition between allergies and auto-immune illnesses: siehe unten.
Hefepilz, befällt Mensch bei schwaches Immunsystem durch Antibiotika/Steroiden/Operation verursacht, weniger in Vagina, setzt 100 Stoffwechselprodukten u.a. Alkohol/Fuselöle frei, lebt von unverarbeitetem/gärendem Zucker, Siedelt auf Schleimhäute Verdauungstrakt/Atemwegen, innere Organen, Diabetiker/geschwächtes Immunsystem/“Pille”,
Best
reaction is fever. In the infectious stage the energy of the person organizes
everything to overcome the disease: through high fever which enhances bodies
metabolism enormously, an increase of white blood cells, acceleration of blood
circulation, vascular dilatation in affected area or all over the body, loss of
appetite to give our digestive system the possibility to concentrate on
elimination of toxins, diarrhea, sweating, a running nose and eruptions, all
elimination mechanisms. These kinds of elimination processes occur frequently after
the administration of a homeopathic remedy. an infection can be sign of the
curing process.
Allerlei: Parenchym (von gr. enchyma „das Eingegossene“, „Füllung“) bezeichnet tierisches o. pflanzliches Grundgewebe. In der Regel weisen die Gewebe bildenden Zellen keine Änderungen auf.
Phytologie: Rezept: Mischung bei Erschöpfungszuständen und
Infektanfälligkeit durch Reizstreifen im Landschaft:
Eleutherococcus senticosus (Taigawurzel) Dil. D1 20 ml
Eupatorium
cannabinum (Wasserdost) Dil. D6 20
ml
Prunus
spinosa (Schlehdorn) Ø 20 ml
Quercus robur (Eiche) Dil. D2 20 ml
Viscum
album (MIstel) Dil. D6 20 ml
Bapt.
verwendet in Präparaten zur Verbesserung des Immunstatus
SOLUNAT Nr. 3 Immunschwäche und zur Immunmodulation/Entzündliche Erkrankungen (Gelenken und Atmungs-, Drüsen- und Hautsystem).
1. Immunstimulierende Pflanzen
Eine immunstimulierende Wirkung ist nicht identisch mit antiviraler oder bakterizider Wirkung.
Die immunstimulierende Wirkung einer Pflanze ist meistens komplex und wirkt fördernd auf mehrere Abwehrmechanismen. So fördert Bapt. die Phagozytose und die Lymphoblastenbildung; hierdurch erhöht sich die Zahl der T-Zellen und der Antikörpertiter. Manche Pflanzen enthalten gleichzeitig immunstimulierende und immunsuppressive Stoffe; beispielsweise wirkt das ätherische Öl von Kassiazimt immunstimulierend, die nichtflüchtigen Stoffe im wässrigen Auszug immunsuppressiv. Süßholz wurde früher als immunsuppressiv eingestuft (cortisolartige Wirkung), ist aber erwiesenermaßen immunstimulierend. In manchen Pflanzengattungen
wirken die einzelnen Arten unterschiedlich. Beispiel: Angelica acutiloba wirkt immunstimulierend, A. sinensis immunsuppressiv. - Ein typischer Immunstimulator ist Echinacea. (Sil.).
2. Allgemein virustatisch wirkende Mittel
Diese kann man in Rezepten aller Krankheiten gesicherter oder angenommener viraler Genese verwenden. - Eine typische, antiviral wirkende Pflanze ist Meisterwurz.
Die später zu dieser Gruppe genannten Pflanzen haben möglicherweise eine Wirkung gegen onkogene, das sind krebserzeugende Viren.
3. Spezifische Mittel gegen bestimmte virale Erkrankungen
Spezifische Wirkung einer Pflanze: Lakritze inaktiviert AIDS-Viren.
In Rezepten können Pflanzenpräparate aus den drei genannten Gruppen beliebig gemischt werden, wobei die Rezepte zwischen drei und zehn Einzelmittel enthalten sollten. Ratsam ist, spezifischen Mitteln auch Mittel aus
1. und 2. zuzusetzen.
[Cathy Lemmon]
Homeopathic prophylaxis expert
Dr.Cathy May Lemmon discusses immunity and susceptibility as understood by both
conventional medicine and homeopathy.
With what I share here, I hope to
make a few things very clear – as what I will share is, I feel, especially
timely and appropriate for us who practise homeopathy today.
Many terms we, even in homeopathy,
freely use are based on conventional understanding – they technically and
fundamentally have no foundation in homeopathic medicine.
I present a few appropriate terms
from conventional medicine for comparison’s sake. But please be assured that I do not intend to
fault or demean these or anything
regarding these, nor do I discourage
study of them. It is absolutely good and
important to have a working knowledge of these.
It is simply important to understand
the fundamentals/foundations of where and how homeopathy views what these
terms, in conventional medicine, are referencing.
Recognizing Conventional Definitions
To begin this essay, I share here,
for consideration, a few appropriate definitions, as found in Webster’s Medical
Dictionary – New Revised Edition (© 2009).
These are clear, concise
conventional definitions relating to the idea of “immunity”/disease
prevention. These are presented
alphabetically as follows:
antibodies – a protein produced by the body which reacts specifically
with a foreign substance in the body
contagious – germs or diseases which are easily transmitted by contact
disease – “sickness or ailment caused by germs or viruses with
consistent results”
[NOTE: the etymology of the English
word, “disease” is literally the two words, “dis-“ and “ease”]
illness – ailment
This dictionary does not provide a definition for “ailment”, so here is
this:
ill – not healthy, diseased
Immune – protected against
disease
Immunity – ability to resist infectious
disease
infect – to contaminate with
organisms
infection – implantation of a germ;
spread of a disease
infectious
– liable to be transmitted by infection
Conventional medicine categorizes
what it recognizes as disease-causing agents into 4 groups: viruses, bacteria,
fungi, and parasites (which can also be further broken down
as protozoa and helminths or worms).
This same Merck Manual Home Health
Handbook (© 2009) presents the idea that disease-causing agents are “invaders”
of the body. As with most conventional medical texts, this book seems to prefer
referencing these items using terminology that can incite fear and a desire for
aggression towards these “invaders”. This
is fine, as the conventional idea envelopes the idea of fighting off disease.
Even the founder of homeopathy
himself, Dr. Samuel Hahnemann (1755-1843), referred to sometimes “murderous”
substances that can cause illness to come upon the body. He was very clear in how these are most
appropriately viewed – that illness was not caused by something outside the
body. Rather, the body will present
symptoms commensurate with its susceptibility to what these agents present and
how receptive to these our bodies are.
Rather than presenting a “history
lesson” here, I feel what is best today is for practitioners of homeopathy to
keep in mind is the fundamental differences in understanding,
as will be discussed. As Hahnemann presents in the Organon, we must
begin our assessments with health first.
Homeopathic medicine promotes,
maintains, and protects health. With
this in mind, it is not, necessarily, a good idea for the body to avoid
illness. Rather, the body desires
to be healthy. What, exactly, does
this mean? And how do we best promote
this?
Homeopathic View of Health
First, allow me to present what I
feel is the homeopathic view of health.
In aphorismen_hanhnemann.htm 9, of his Organon, Hahnemann presents
things brilliantly and concisely, as far as how he felt health should be
viewed. He shares that it is the vital
force (“dynamis”) “animating the human organism (that) reigns in supreme
sovereignty”, maintaining the homeostasis of “all the parts of the living
organism in a harmony that obliges wonderment.”
He concludes this Aphorism with the statement that it is the “reasoning
spirit” inhabiting this organism that, when things are running well, is allowed
to “reach the lofty goal of human existence.”5
I present here that, these “lofty
goals of human existence” do not include the fantastical idea of avoiding every
disease. The idea of “health” is not so
simply defined as being able to avoid sickness.
There are, indeed, certain diseases that are best avoided, when possible
(such as pertussis in infancy and meningitis). Of course understood that there are those who
have been ill from birth, or who have certain physical ailments and weaknesses,
and so on. We all know that working with
individuals such as these and their unique needs can be quite effectively done
through homeopathy – but that is a discussion that can happen another time.
Hahnemann presents in the footnote
to aphorismen_hanhnemann.htm
8 in his Organon (6th edition),
his thoughts compared to those shared by Dr. Christoph Wilhelm Hufeland, the
chief medical officer to the king of Prussia himself and a very
highly-recognized medical authority at the time. Hahnemann notes that Hufeland commented that,
while homeopathy can remove symptoms of a disease, somehow the disease will
remain.
Hahnemann essentially called this
nonsense, saying that this presents a “materialistic conception of
disease”. His emphasis ever remained
what we must ever remember in homeopathy:
that disease is what happens when the vital force of a person is
disturbed, it is an internal, “dynamic” reaction to a substance.
Homeopath, James Burnett, explains
further about this idea of dynamism and how it works in health, making it more
relevant to our subject here. In his
book, Vaccinosis and its Cure by Thuja15 (©1884) Compton shares how it is
nonsensical to vaccinate a “perfectly healthy individual who has never been
vaccinated” as this person is “liable to catch small-pox”. (At the time this book was published, this
was still the only vaccine in common use.)
After vaccinating this “perfectly
healthy” individual, him not contracting smallpox is then, according to
conventional medical authorities, seen as evidence of the effectiveness of the
smallpox vaccine. Burnett makes very
clear that, “no one can be more than perfectly healthy” [pg. 5] and that any
modification of this necessarily involves a “minus” from the “perfect healthy”
the person had been enjoying. Burnett
presents that what this actually presents is that “the protective power of
vaccination is due to a diseased state of the body.” [ibid]
In other words, a person enjoying
good health should be noted for this, not for a potential or possibility that
he/she may get sick. Illness will and
does happen, even to the most resilient.
But this is not because the body may be missing an outside “thing”, but
because the body, in its innate wisdom, realizes that there is something it
must learn.
To insert a foreign substance in an
unnatural way to the body (in this case, through an injection) for the purpose
of eliciting an “immune-type” response from the body is a blanket approach that
presents faults from its beginning, because it does not abide by natural ways
that have worked since the beginning of time.
I encourage consideration of what
this presents as we continue.
Many here are familiar with Jay
Yasgur’s work, Yasgur’s Homeopathic Dictionary and Holistic Health Reference –
a book I highly recommend having on hand for definitions of things or things
relating to things homeopathic.
In this dictionary, Yasgur offers no
definitions for the terms, “antibody”, “contagious”, “illness”, “immune”,
“infect” or any words containing these. Many reasons can
be offered for his decision to have
done so. This is not intended to be a conventional “medical dictionary”, by
itself – and there are plenty of good ones of these.
But this is part of the point I am
working to make here. These words are
not founded in homeopathy or homeopathic medicine – they are based in
conventional medicine, approaches, and understanding. With a complete understanding of homeopathic
medicine, I dare say, we may not need to utilize any of these terms.
Do we get sick? Of course we do. Do some of us get sick more often and/or more
severely than others? Of course. But
avoiding illness altogether will not allow us to
obtain our fullest potential. Many studies have been in place and are still
being done that confirm how the body, once it contracts and sees itself through
a disease, will
often, in ways, be more healthy than
it was before7.
What, exactly, is disease or
illness, as viewed and understood within homeopathy? Let us venture into this.
Disease and Illness – Viewed
Homeopathically
In his book, Yasgur presents this:
“Disease – a lack of ease. Simply, an illness or sickness; a disturbance in
structure or function of an organ, organ system, or part of the body. An
abnormal condition of an organism or part thereof as a consequence of stress,
infection, inherent weakness, or environmental stressors which impairs the
normal functioning of the organism.
A state of disease is present if two
of the following are present: consistent anatomical alternations, a
recognizable etiological agent, or the identification of signs and symptoms. .
. According to Hahnemann, disease is a
derangement of the vital force. . . a vast limitless concept to explore. . .”4
The German language presents these
terms: Krank for sick, and Krankheit for illness or disease (a “state of being
sick”). My German dictionary (not a
German-English dictionary – a straight German dictionary) defines “Krank” as
being an organic or functional disorder of health in which health is impaired;
an impairment to health.
Interesting, in this dictionary, the
term “Krankheit” is defined essentially the same, but with an emphasis that
this refers to body (Leibe-) as well as spirit (Gest-), and even
the mind (Gemüt-). How this idea of “disease” works is
understood on another level within homeopathy.
Understood here must be that this
was first explained by Hahnemann, who had no access to electron microscopes, no
concept of things like germs or viruses.
But he observed things – observation
has always been fundamental to homeopathy.
To point to germs, viruses,
parasites as what have always caused disease is ignoring the fact that
homeopathic medicines have been working very effectively prophylactically since
the time of Hahnemann. There is much
more to things relating to immunity and prophylaxis than this.
In aphorismen_hanhnemann.htm 11. Hahnemann shares quite clearly that
it is only when the vital force is “untuned” through the influence of a
“hostile disease agent”
that “the disagreeable sensations
and abnormal functions that we call disease” can occur. He further shares, in the lengthy footnote to
this (6th ed), about the dynamizing (“potentizing”) of homeopathic
medicines as well as likening these to how magneticism works.
No one can see it, yet what visible
mechanism tells you to lift your arm? This
is the powerful dynamism within the body at work. So it is with what works unseen.
How was it that he found
homeopathically-prepared Belladonna presents effective prophylaxis against
scarlet fever?
He observed the symptoms – the
similar symptoms between what this medicine caused in a healthy prover to what
he was observing in those contracting the scarlet fever where he was. Somehow taking this medicine – in a whole,
natural, homeopathic way – allows the “unseen” energies in the homeopathic
medicine to interact with the “unseen” energies within the person, that are
working to keep the person healthy. This
provides, on this energetic level, nontoxic yet highly effective prevention
against
the ravages a disease can present.
Will it provide protection in every
case? Of course not. But because this is energetic, the effectiveness
of homeopathic prophylaxis is recording consistently high – right
about 90%, when known exposure to
disease has taken place.
This brings us to the idea of
susceptibility. More than an idea of a
person not being “immune”, we will now speak of what Hahnemann saw homeopathic
medicine does
and desired to be promoting of doing
– reducing susceptibility.
In the definition for
“susceptibility”, Yasgur provides in his Dictionary, he says, quite succinctly,
that “. . . Homeopathy . . . (aims) to decrease a person’s
susceptibility/sensitivity to disease-producing influences. . .”
The idea of “immunity” is working to
avoid something – in medicine, this is understood as avoiding contracting a
disease, or getting sick. On the other
hand, homeopathy addresses the idea of
wellness, not by avoiding something but by promoting, maintaining, and
protecting health.
Of course, there are certain
illnesses that are very good to avoid, when possible. These include pertussis (“whooping cough”) in
infants, who are the most vulnerable to this, and meningitis, which can kill
within 24 hours of contracting it.
Beyond issues such as these, it is
best seen from the homeopathic perspective, that it is good, for the promotion
of health, to not only work to reduce susceptibility, but also
to prepare for and work with these
illnesses, because they are and ever will be a part of our environment and are
not going to simply “go away” with promotion of this idea
of mass immunity.
Contraction of an illness or disease
happens inside, not outside. This is
why, as contagious as a disease may be, still, not everyone will contract
it. This is also why among those who do
contract a certain disease, not everyone will display symptoms to the same
degree of severity. This is also why, from the homeopathic or holistic point of
view, the idea of being “a-symptomatic” implies you simply do not have a
certain disease.
Let’s explore just a few ideas that
we, within homeopathy, are good to be sure we separate ourselves from a
conventional understanding. Not to
ignore things, of course – but to work with these differently.
1 – The “IMMUNE SYSTEM”: This is not like the respiratory system or the
circulatory system or any of the other “systems” conventional medicine has
broken the body down into. When looked at for what it is and contains, it is
fascinating – and it also essentially covers the entire body. Indeed, there are some key components,
including bone marrow, the thymus, the spleen, lymph nodes, tonsils, and the
appendix.9 But basically, just about
everything else, in one way or another, effects or is affected by the body when
it deems an “immune” reaction is appropriate.And nephrologist, Dr. Suzanne
Humphries points out in her book, Dissolving Illusions, that, “The more
scientists learn about the immune system, the more they realize their profound
lack of understanding. . .”
2 – The idea of “ANTIBODIES”: Studying cells and cell functions is also
quite fascinating. However, it must be understood that it was only relatively
recently that these
–antibodies– were determined to be
the “key” indicator of immunity. They
are not. Let’s discuss this just a bit.
The name “antibody” was coined by
the German scientist, Paul Ehrlich around 1900. The had found a form of
immunity happening in an animal serum from which they were removing all
cells. Not having a name for it, Ehrlich
coined the term, „Antikörper” (antibody) to likely simply be a “place holder”,
until a more appropriate term was found.
Yet, in spite of its odd sound and actually, in 1903, being called,
“weird”, this term, “antibody” has stuck.
The antibody was first given
recognition as the “fundamental unit of immunity” in 1950.12 Yet there has developed a
double-understanding of the role these play in protection from disease. Any more (since 2020), it has become accepted
that the presence of antibodies are indicators of immunity, whether or not this
is actually demonstrated. Historically,
the presence of antibodies has been seen as an indication that one has been
exposed to disease, nothing more.
[REF:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/tnYwT34EddFZ/]
Supporting this, several studies have concluded that the presence of
antibodies does not necessarily equate to immunity. For example, in the case of pertussis, “. . .
Laboratory measurement of antibodies has not demonstrated a level that
corresponds to protection.”
It has also been determined that the
absence of antibodies does not indicate a lack of immunity. [Table 1]
Perhaps it can be of interesting
note that, because of how things have been changing in the world over these
last couple of years, there is more question regarding whether antibodies
should be considered the sole indicator of immunity. Which is a good thing.
But the idea of antibody production
has never been one to be expected of the prophylactic use of homeopathic
medicines. What simply happens is that,
under proper use, homeopathic prophylaxis does encourage the body to learn what
it needs to so it can move on. And it
has been shown that, after proper use of homeoprophylaxis, about
90% of the time, the body will not
produce symptoms when known exposure to a disease has taken place.
Science and Truth
The idea of “science” ceases to be
science when ideas are no longer explored or questioned. The idea of “truth” presents religious
thought – but, more pertinent to here,
it also presents things that do not
change, in spite of time and in spite of question. Fundamental homeopathic principles have
remained unchanged since the time of Hahnemann – and this form of medicine
continues to provide marvelous results.
Along this line and pertinent to
note here is the nearly century-long gap between the time Edward Jenner first
introduced the idea of vaccination for smallpox in 1796 until
the anthrax vaccine was introduced
in 1881. Reasons for this are several,
but homeopath, Robert Ellis Dudgeon in 1853, stated quite clearly in a lecture
presented in 1853
that, “Beyond vaccination. . . the
allopathic school of the present day does not concern itself much with
medicinal prophylactics” – so disease
prevention was not a priority
for conventional medicine.
In 2021, Davin Packer of the College
of Medicine at Ohio State University addressed this question, regarding a
reason, from the conventional side, for this “long delay. . . could be
attributed, at least in part, to inadequate disease theories.”
Since Hahnemann found the
prophylactic effectiveness of homeopathic medicines in 1799, research into this
has continued to the present day. Some ideas continue, which
are good to grasp within homeopathy,
as the view from “within” still remains unchanged.
Dr. Christoph Wilhelm Hufeland
(1762-1836), was recognized as “the” chief medical officer during Hahnemann’s
time, and was the chief medical officer to Friedrich Wilhelm, III, the king of
Prussia himself. He and Hahnemann knew
one another.
In his Organon, Hahnemann references
him specifically in the footnote to aphorismen_hanhnemann.htm 8.
Here, Hahnemann shares that Hufeland purported that, “homeopathy can
remove the symptoms, but the disease remains”
Today, conventional medicine continues to present that disease comes
from outside – that viruses and
other “disease-causing agents” enter
the body and, with themselves, bring illness.
Hahnemann responds in this footnote,
by saying he feels this view is nonsense.
When the body is well, it is well.
He shares that Hufeland’s view is a “materialistic conception of
disease” and that disease is “a state of being of the organism dynamically
untuned by a disturbed vital force, as an alternation of its state of health. .
.”.
Again, Hahnemann makes it clear that
disease-causing agents can, indeed, be horrid – and we do need to be cautious
and prepared because of this. It is the
condition of the body that determines if infection will happen and how
mild/severe this infection will be, if the body will show any symptoms at
all. This is where the focus is best
kept,
as far as the promotion of health.
This idea of promoting health, so
central to homeopathy, was further expounded upon, in reference to prophylaxis,
by Burnett, Vaccinosis. He wrote this
work during the time when the vaccination for smallpox was still what was
primarily done – hence his focus, for this work, on the homeopathic remedy of Thuja.
But he knew there were many other
homeopathic medicines that worked prophylactically for various diseases. While making it clear that he did not
consider himself
“anti-vaccination”, Burnett shares
in this work quite clearly the idea that, with the homeopathic view and
understanding of health, it seems nonsensical to vaccinate a “perfectly healthy
individual who has never been vaccinated” simply because this person is “liable
to catch small-pox”.
He shares that it should also make
no sense that, after vaccination, this “perfectly healthy” individual, then not
succumbing to smallpox provides evidence of the effectiveness of the smallpox
vaccine. Burnett states quite clearly
that, “no one can be more than perfectly healthy”16, and that any modification
of this state must, therewith, involve a “minus” from the “perfect health” the
person had been enjoying. To summarize,
Burnett presents that it must be understood that “the protective power of
vaccination is due
to a diseased state of the body.”.
It is vitally important that we
observe this within homeopathy – that susceptibility is what must be observed
and worked with, so that health can be the focus.
observing things homeopathically
As far as the idea of avoiding
disease altogether, this is an idea best approached quite cautiously. First to recognize, of course, is the idea of
fear, which opens the door to susceptibility to just about anything. Unfortunately, along with this, must be
recognized that avoiding getting ill – so trying to say we are healthy because
we never get sick – does not make sense for proper health either.
Is “immunisation” the most
appropriate word to be utilizing when it comes to the idea of prophylaxis
within homeopathy? I present that it may
not be, if “immunity” is thought of as avoiding the contraction of a disease,
not allowing the body to get sick.
Hahnemann makes no secret of
recognizing that certain diseases can be quite dangerous and, indeed, be “fatal”. Throughout his Organon, he refers to certain
diseases with terms such as “murderous” (pg. 377) and the like. However, he makes meticulous note of what
homeopathy, at its heart, is all about – he notes the symptoms he observed when
studying illness.
In his Lesser Writings, there are
two writings which he devotes to scarlet fever18 as well as one to
cholera19 Each these, alone, testifies
how important it was to him to know the symptoms. He makes a chart of in his second writing on
scarlet fever – this chart comparing what is found in the “old genuine scarlet
fever” and the “new red miliary fever”, which was being called scarlet
fever. From this, it is very easy to
tell that, what was being observed as “scarlet fever”, was clearly not18.
Though Hahnemann never used the term
himself, determining similar symptoms in a disease outbreak to find a remedy
that will match these as closely as possible has become known as determining a
Genus Epidemicus (“GE”). These symptoms
must present themselves consistently in every circumstance of a presenting
illness.
This can prove very helpful in
determining the most appropriate homeopathic medicine to utilize for
prophylaxis. In his Organon, Hahnemann
repeatedly notes at least two diseases which consistently do this: smallpox and
measles. However, determining a GE
remedy is not as easily approached today.
Locally, this can happen with some
degree of “ease”. But, considering the
worldwide outreach of homeopathy today, there are varying differences in
climate and weather patterns, temperature, elevation of habitation, etc which
must also be taken into consideration in determining a GE.
Hahnemann makes it very clear, in
his Organon and other writings, that the expression of the disease – the
manifestation of the symptoms – must be noted in every circumstance. It is the individual not a labeled “disease”,
and the individual’s response to this
condition that we are treating, or working to prevent.
The idea of susceptibility is
addressed in this same 2009 Webster’s Medical Dictionary as “having little
resistance, easily influenced”. This is
an acceptable definition, when considered homeopathically. However, Yasgur expounds on this idea,
presenting ideas even more appropriate to consider within homeopathy. He writes this:
“susceptibility” – the degree of sensitivity to outside influences. Homeopathy
as well as other holistic therapies aim to decrease a person’s
susceptibility/sensitivity to disease-producing influences. . .”6
Hahnemann was very scientific with
what was available for him at the time. This
did not include things such as electron microscopes or the like. He did not know nor could see things such as
a germ or virus or protozoa. Yet he also
proved very insightful and intuitive, in noting that the ascertaining of
individual symptomatology was key. And
because homeopathic research continues, the Materia Medicas and Repertories we
work with today within homeopathy are each thousands of pages long.
The work within homeopathy is very
intense, very focused. But it is not
based on conventional understanding – rather, on symptoms.
CONCLUSION
I am known for my promotion and
education regarding homeopathic prophylaxis.
This nontoxic form of “immunization” should never be considered
“homeopathic vaccination”, as this is not at all what we work, with
homeoprophylaxis, to promote.
Hahnemann determined in 1799 that
Like not only Cures Like, it also Prevents Like. In his Lesser Writings – Cure and Prevention
of Scarlet Fever – he shares this:
“Who can deny that the perfect prevention of infection. . . would offer
infinite advantages over any mode of treatment, be it of the most incomparable
kind soever?”
Dr. Burnett also shares this in
Vaccinosis:
“. . . the law of similars also applies to the prevention of disease.” –
J.C. Burnett
And former AIH president, Dr. Arthur
Grimmer, is known for his promotion of homeopathic prophylaxis. He has shared the following:
“As the Law of Similars excels in the power to cure, it excels more forcibly
and certainly in the art of disease prevention.” – A.H. Grimmer, 194920
At the January 2020 conference of my
organization, Homeoprophylaxis: A Worldwide Choice for Disease Prevention, the
well-known Indian homeopath, Dr. Raj K. Manchanda, who offered indispensable
assistance putting the conference together, shared, in an interview during the
conference that homeopathy is known worldwide today because of its
effectiveness in homeoprophylaxis.
Please let this short essay present
food for thought, as we continue to move forward with homeopathy. This medicine is still working, and working
very well, both as treatment and prevention of symptoms.
Further articles I will share will
include a focus on how homeoprophylaxis works, from a homeopathic perspective;
which homeopathic medicines have been shown to be effective for which
disease/illness; where homeoprophylaxis has been successfully used in practise,
and records of this; how best to utilize homeopathic prophylaxis in practise; a
more appropriate homeopathic word for “infectious”; homeoprophylaxis for
tropical diseases; unique needs for homeoprophylaxis for travel; and more.
In closing here, I will simply
present this: I am fluent in English and German, and have studied many other
languages including just a bit of Latin.
I would, nevertheless, like to propose possibly adding a phrase as we
move ahead. As near as I can tell, this
seems the most appropriate translation of it:
Vorwort/Suchen. Zeichen/Abkürzungen Impressum.