Vergleich: Spenglersan.: Kolloiden.
Intensive Studium on Corona.
Whenever possible, each case should be carefully evaluated to determine the appropriate individual medicine that most closely suits it. The following homeopathic medicines have shown the most promise both regionally and internationally, so far: Bry., Ars., Eupatorium perfoliatum, Gels., Camphora and Kalium muriaticum.
[Dr. Richard Pitcairn]
Malaise, wants to lie down, fever, dry cough, soreness of body and headache among the symptoms explored. Sense of smell increased; skin sensitive to touch. Taste bitter.
[Dr. Manish Bhatia and others]
Homeopathy is based on the principle that a drug will prove curative in a condition, if it can produce similar signs and symptoms in a healthy human being during a drug trial.
In case of epidemics, a general remedy is selected on the basis of the symptoms of the existing patients and that remedy, known as Genus Epidemicus, can be given to the affected population group for that particular epidemic. The Genus epidemicus will change from year to year if the presenting symptoms change. Not just the symptoms, but also the sequence and intensity of specific symptoms can change the indicated homeopathic remedy.
Based on the epidemiological and clinical studies done so far, we know the following symptoms, which our homeopathic remedy should cover:
Finding the Genus Epidemicus
There are several methods of approaching epidemics, and Hahnemann teaches these different methods; but basically, you have to look at it ‘as if one person’.
You have to know how to take the symptoms, and you have to know how to put them together in order to find the genus epidemicus. It’s not just a matter of throwing
them all into the repertory and seeing what comes up first and second and third. There’s more to it.
So most people that I’ve seen treating epidemics just say, ‘What remedy worked for you?’, ‘What remedy worked for you?’, ‘What did you give in this case?’,
‘What did you give in that case?’ But have to see a large number of people and put these symptoms together and put it together in a particular way to find the remedies
that are most effective for this epidemic.
It takes a bit of knowledge and practice; and a group of people working together will make it much better. But it’s very doable once you have the techniques.
In this course I’m teaching a few new techniques that I gained in my work with AIDS in Africa – how to repertorise it, how to repertorise it more quickly, how to communicate, how to put together the symptoms, how to look at the totality of ‘as if one person’ in the epidemic.
I do give a few good examples in this course of, for instance, flu and measles epidemics that I treated in the past and how I went about them. What I can say, what
I observed is often not what you expect.
You think you have a flu epidemic, you want to use Bryonia and Gelsemium and Aconite. It often, if you put it all together, will come out a different remedy; totally something that you would not have thought of. So, this can only be found in this way by taking the epidemic as a group and doing it in a proper way.
I very much hope that by doing this course, people will be better equipped to treat those flus and to treat those measles epidemics and all the other things that are happening. We have to follow Hahnemann on this, and he developed it into a well-honed system. It’s all there. I’ve just added my experience, but I put it all together in a way that I hope is very easy to understand.
Jeremy’s Blueprint for Managing Epidemics and the Genus Epidemicus of AIDS It’s available from: www.dynamis.edu
A New Source:
In homeopathy until today remedies have been used coming from material sources. These include the imponderables like Sol and Magnetis as also these originate from material sources. Immaterial sources have to my knowledge hardly been used, and if so met with great skepticism. Their basis is consciousness and since nobody can see that under a microscope or put it into a mortar the reserve is understandable. This doesn’t mean though that this source can and should not be used.
I’m sure there are many ways, either based on spiritual practice or technology, in which remedies based on conscious purposely design can be made. My personal experience
is limited to those prepared by Peter Chappell. In his search for a simillimum for AIDS in Africa he couldn’t find a suitable remedy in the then existing materia medica and found a way to create a simillimum without the use of material substance.
He has named his first remedy PC1 and developed many others later, which together are referred to as PC Resonances.
The genus epidemicus that is mentioned cannot be spotted in all epidemics. Even in cases when it is possible to discern it, that does not mean that all cases will be affected with this specific remedy.
The genus epidemicus may be ascertained only after a practitioner has treated a sufficient number of cases and has evaluated the effect of his treatment, meaning to observe which remedies had acted really well. If he finds that a remedy prevails in successful cases to a great degree, then we can say that this may be the genus epidemicus.
With such cases today, developing similar symptoms is impossible to be found with the level of health of our contemporary societies. I can foresee that if everyone was trying to find the genus epidemicus, possibly everyone would find a different one!
What may happen for example, after treating let us say 5 cases and finding in two of them were he has given the same remedy, it will proclaimed as the genus epidemicus.
One can imagine the total chaos and confusion that will ensue in such a case where everyone will propose a remedy.
The conclusion we must arrive at is that a process of serious evaluation is needed before one can give instructions to the public. It is ridiculous for anyone to announce that
he has found the genus epidemicus by his imagination.
If one analyses the information, he will find different remedies indicated, but as we said in the beginning, any remedy you may prescribe will appear to have some kind of effect on the patient. But when the correct remedy is prescribed in influenza like cases, the positive effect is felt instantly.
But a word of warning is necessary: we cannot claim under these circumstances that it was the effect of the homeopathic remedy that cured the patient until we have the proof in an experiment as I described above.
The reasons that I proposed the research to take place in Europe and not in India are the following:
1. The patients could be found immediately, as in Europe the patients are coming to hospitals by hundreds every day.
2. In Europe the methods of detecting the virus are perfected and fast.
3. For such a serious experiment that would evaluate for the first time a different therapeutic approach, the result would have been accepted much more easily if the trial
would have taken place within the best medical facilities and under the best supervision that the world has available at this present time.
4. In any case the patients of the homeopathic group would have an extra privilege of support from homeopathy without depriving them from the conventional therapeutics and all the modern equipment and facilities of conventional medicine.
[Dr Amarsina Nikam]
During the epidemic of scarlet fever, after treating numerous patients Dr. Samuel Hahnemann observed patients with similar clinical presentations. After analysing the symptoms, he found ‘Belladonna’ useful in curing those patients. According to Dr Hahnemann this remedy could not only cure those patients but could also be used as
an effective prophylactic medicine. Thereafter he termed this the ‘Genus epidemicus’ in that epidemic situation.
The knowledge which is essential for enabling us to choose a most suitable homoeopathic remedy can only be obtained by a complete survey of the disease picture, not
only of a single patient, but deducing it from a number of patients.
After a thoroughly individualized examination of each patient, only then can a homeopath, succeed in finding a suitable homoeopathic remedy.
Thus, the Genus Epidemicus can only be identified after closely studying the symptom picture of the outbreak.
Nit-ac.: for bunions with swelling and with stinging pains. Almost a specific
Ingrown toe nails: Mag-aust
The Spanish Flu and Hydr-ac.
[Dr. VK Krishnamurty]
Scorpion sting: Ledum 200 is a specific. Repeat every 5 minutes till pain comes down.
[Dr. G.H.G. Jahr]
The best remedy for acute parotitis is Merc,
Dios.: das einzige homöopathische Mittel, das eine Paukenhöhlenentzündung des Ohrs heilt.
If the uterus has become prolapsed in consequence of hard labor, the prolapse most generally yields to Nux-v. or Sep
[Dr. K.N. Mathur]
Anthrac.: Carbuncles with burning pain
Aur-met.: Atrophy of testicles in boys
Zinc-p.: Brain fog of businessmen – lower potencies
Mit der Nosode Pertussinum D200 als einmalige Gabe, zusammen z.B. mit Corallium rubrum D4 (rote Koralle), 3x täglich eine Gabe, kann für einige Zeit eine Prophylaxe
gegenüber Keuchhusteninfektionen erzielt werden, wobei keine Immunität im Sinne einer Impfung erfolgt, sondern eine erhöhte Resistenz gegenüber dem Erreger.
[Dr. K.N. Mathur]
Stict.: Sleeples due to nervousness. Tincture to 2x
[John Minz. Canton]
An epidemic of scarlatina not responsive to the remedies in common use. An excoriating nasal discharge in conjunction with a few other symptoms peculiar to this individual
epidemic led him to select Arum triphyllum for these cases, which he applied with great success (= genus epidemicus).
[John Minz, Canton, Ohio, mid-1800's]
Finding the Genus Epidemicus
H. describes the process of determining the genus epidemicus concisely. in his Organon: aph. 101:
Usually the physician does not immediately perceive the complete picture of the epidemic in the first case that he treats. since the collective disease reveals itself in the totality
of signs and symptoms only after several cases have been closely observed. Nevertheless. an observant physician can often come so close after seeing only one or two patients
that he becomes aware of the characteristic picture of the epidemic and can already find its appropriate homoeopathic remedy.
Organon: aph. 102
From writing down the symptoms of several cases of this sort. the outline of the disease picture becomes more and more complete - not more extensive and wordy. but more characteristic. containing more accurately the peculiarity of the particular collective disease. The ordinary symptoms -loss of appetite. sleeplessness. etc.- become more precisely qualified. and those that are more exceptional special and in the circumstances unusual and belong to only a few diseases. reveal themselves and constitute the characteristic picture of this epidemic. All those who catch an epidemic at a particular time have a disease flowing from the same source and therefore the same disease. But the entire scope of such an epidemic disease. the totality of its symptoms (which we need to know in order to grasp the whole disease picture and choose an appropriate remedy for it) cannot be perceived in any one patient. but can be fully distilled and gathered only from the sufferings of several patients with different physical constitutions.
In subsequent cases either the appropriateness of the remedy chosen in the first cases will be corroborated or else a more appropriate one. the most appropriate one. will be revealed.
Examples from a Pertussis Epidemic
As a specific example of this process. in a cluster of cases of Pertussis I treated in November-December of 1996. early cases I saw yielded the following repertorizations:
Pertussis Case 1 Pertussis Case 2
Pertussis Case 3 Pertussis Case 4
Cases 1. 2 and 4 lack sufficiently characterizing symptoms to indicate a clear remedy choice. Case 3 however reveals a clear picture of Corallium rubrum. with the highly characterizing symptoms of copious postnasal discharge and vomiting of stringy mucus.
These 4 cases taken together. "As if of one person". provide a group anamnesis of this particular epidemic of pertussis:
Corallium rubrum Cases 1 & 2 were treated when first seen with Drosera and Kali bichromicum. respectively; but did not respond to these initial reasonable prescriptions.
After the initial several cases seen confirmed the genus epidemicus to be Corallium rubrum. these early cases were re-treated successfully. and Coral-r. served to effectively treat 12 of 14 cases seen in this cluster; and was used with apparent success in the homoeoprophylaxis of numerous siblings and playmates of the cases seen.
Potency and dosage for prophylactic treatment are guided by the same issues that guide the treatment of active disease; largely. the dynamic nature of the illness. the vitality and sensitivity of the individual patient and most importantly, what you happen to have on hand at the time. In general. the lower potencies suffice. I'll commonly use 12C
or 30C. occasionally 200C. and on rare occasions have used 1M potencies in prophylaxis.
Single doses in pellet form are clearly effective in prophylaxis. conferring a good window of protection; but as most epidemic illnesses I encounter have a drawn-out presence in the community. I generally prefer to give the remedy in repeated doses of gradually ascending potency in medicinal solution.
A typical regimen for a highly virulent disease such as scarlatina (for the patient of average vitality and sensitivity) would be to put 1 pellet of 12C. 30C or 200C in 1 ounce
of distilled water in a small dropper bottle; and dose 2 drops daily after 4 succussions of the bottle. for the duration of the epidemic in the community. An alternative is to
use 1 pellet in 4 oz distilled water in a larger bottle. with a ½ tsp dose after 4 succussions. Dosing is reduced in patients judged of lower vitality +/o. higher sensitivity.
During the more lengthy 'flu season. I'll often recommend weekly (rather than daily) repetition in a similar manner. In patients considered particularly at risk of complications from the 'flu'. I might anticipate the epidemic -until a genus epidemicus is clear- by using Anas barabare 8 (the commercial preparations are 200C). 1-2 pellets in 1oz distilled water. in this same manner. dosed once weekly.
This frequency of repetition has as much to do with the pace of the disease and the (similar) pace of the remedy as it does with the duration of the epidemic. Scarlatina generally has a rapid and furious pace. calling for a simillimum (Bell.) with a matching pace and more limited duration of action. Influenza more often has a more indolent pace. calling for a simillimum of matching slow pace (Bry. Gels.) and longer duration of action. There are no recipes here which can be followed in cook-book fashion; rather. consider the dosing directions above as examples. and allow yourself to be guided more by your clinical experience in homoeopathic treatment for the cases at hand.
[Dr. VK Krishnamurty]
Wenn ein besonderes Heilmittel "ein Simile" für eine Krankheit ist, werden wir bei dieser Krankheit zuerst dieses Mittel einsetzen, und nur wenn es nicht wirkt (was bei einem
von 100 Fällen vorkommen kann), suchen wir weiter nach dem 'Similimum', der 'Gesamtheit der Symptome' usw.
Varicose veins: Ham.
Effects of HPV vaccine: Alum.
Ant-c. Arthritis deformans a near specific (extreme tenderness of the soles of the feet).
Aur-ars. Is specific for Borreliose
[Dr. Roger Morrison]
Bar-m.: almost a specific for aneurysm of the aorta (thoracic or abdominal).
Bry.: claimed that in seven out of every ten cases of typhoid for which Bryonia was indicated. it would be the only remedy indicated. because the symptoms
of the drug correspond to those of every stage of typhoid.
The remedy to permanently cure billiary calculi is Chin. Unless some symptoms call you specifically to another drug. put your patient on a course of Chin.
[Dr. Manish Bhatia]
Chin.: almost a specific for Chikungunya
[Dr. med. Helmut B. Retzek]
Am Abend. nach einem Seminar. wenn die Homöopathen so rumsitzen und quatschen. erfährt man viele spannende Anekdoten. irgendeinen aufregenden Fall. irgendeine bemerkenswerte Begebenheit innerhalb eines komplexen Falles. Viele dieser "Kleinigkeiten" sind bemerkenswerte Beobachtungen. die evtl. anderen Kollegen bei einem
ähnlich gelagerten Problem oder Fall helfen könnten oder einfach ein tieferes Arzneimittel-Verständnis geben.
Ein Beispiel aus der EH: "… Dr. Kissel behandelte 93 Fälle rechtsseitiger Pneumonie mit Nasenbluten aus dem rechten Nasenloch. Appetitverlust + verlangt kalte Getränken. Stechen l.
Thorax verhindert das Atmen. Druck hinterm Sternum. muss sich zum Atmen aufsetzen um nicht zu ersticken. kollaptisches Bild mit blassem Gesicht, drohender Lungenlähmung mit Cupr-act.. (Hoyne T.S. Vol II. S. 227)"
Das ist doch tatsächlich eine fantastische Beobachtung! Jedenfalls bemerkenswert. weil uns dieser kurze Beitrag die Arznei als wichtige. weil lebensrettende Arznei bei einer schwersten Epidemie beschreibt. mit ihrem Hauptwirkungsort und wichtigen differenzierenden Nebensymptomen. sie damit also homöopathisch korrekt verschreibbar wird - und er fehlt im Repertorium!
[Dr. P.C. Majumbar]
Cupr-met.: In Asiatic cholera in its various stages and when given according to indications. cures the patient at once.
Intermittent Neuralgia of well defined periodicity. i.e. nervous pains of well defined duration. which come at a certain time and disappear at a certain time every day.
Chinin-s. is a specific
of the first degree. which never failed me. unless the patient had before taken Chinin-s. in massive doses.
Cicuta virosa was tried for cerebro-spinal meningitis by Dr. Baker. of Moravia. N.Y. who cured. during an epidemic 60 cases of all degrees of malignancy. without the loss of a single case.
This is a wonderful record and he thinks it is as near a specific for this disease as can be.
Ant-t. the nearest to a specific for cholera morbus of any remedy. For more than 25 years I have seldom found it necessary to use any other.
and then only when there were severe cramps in the stomach and bowels which Cupr-met. relieved.
Ant-c.: diarrhoea # constipation. oftenest found with old people, the only remedy
Chorea: Baehr claims Cupr-met. will cure most cases of chorea. It is indicated where the choreic movements start in the muscles of the fingers and toes and ext. limbs.
[Dr. C.G. Jahr]
Bar-c.: For Steatoma (Lipoma) the principal remedy.
Nose bleed - Ferr-pic. almost a specific for nose bleeding. 3rd trituration is recommended.
[Dr. E.P. Anshutz]
Lap-a.: Scrofulous enlargement of the cervical glands. it is almost specific where the glands have a certain amount of elasticity and pliability about them. rather than a stony hardness
Leptospira ictero-hemorrhagica homeopatical in Cuba: The prophylaxis consisted of 2 single doses about 2 weeks apart. Included in the dose was the Lepto nosode + some Bach flower remedies to address the mental distress of the disaster situation.
[Dr. W.H. Dickinson]
Lyss. is genus of Borderline Syndrome
Mag-p.: cured hiccough most frequently. There are several cases on record where the condition had been of long standing speedily cured. With one case the hiccoughs at times occurred 30x per minute. The patient’s life had been in danger for two months. Tab.
[Dr. J.T. Kent]
Naja: Valvular troubles of the heart. in young persons with cardiac valvular diseases. If the valvular trouble is congenital it cannot be cured. In school boys and
girls who have no symptoms. this is the generic remedy for this kind of complaint. Always prescribe Naja unless guided away from it by some specific symptom
[Dr. G.H.G. Jahr]
The best remedy for acute parotitis is Merc, in most cases a specific.
"Epidemien. die im Januar und Februar auftreten. verlangen häufig Mezereum."
Opium in Alcoholism
Genus for tennis elbow: Ruta
Polyp-p. C 10.000 is almost a specific for Chikungunya given in one single dose.
[Dr. Franz Hartmann]
Puls: the specific remedy in otitis where the external and internal inflammations run a parallel course. both break out simultaneously. and equally acute and violent.
Sec.: Burning-feet-Syndrom (< Wärme)
[C.M.F. Von Boenninghausen]
Pocken: Thuja is a Specific
Sol-carolinense: good clinical record in explosive and spasmodic coughs. and is recommended by eclectic physicians as almost specific.
Bell. 200 C in preventing Leptospirosis in Cuba is documented on the PUB-MED website. According to the PUB-MED published in 2010:
“A homeoprophylactic formulation was prepared from dilutions of four circulating strains of Leptospirosis. This formulation was administered orally to 2.3 million persons
at high risk in an epidemic in a region affected by natural disasters.
The data from surveillance were used to measure the impact of the intervention by comparing with historical trends and non-intervention regions.
Xanthium spinosum: specific for hydrophobia and is recommended for chronic cystitis in women.
Zinc-v.: Restless legs: a common symptom of nervous persons - they cannot sit still. or they must keep the legs in constant motion
[Dr. Vickie Menear]
Helleborus niger als Spezifikum bei Gehirntumor
In an epidemic in Wavre, Sarracenia was given to 2000 persons. All who took it escaped the disease. 200 cases were treated with Sarracenia without a death. Aborts the disease and arrests
pustules. > in fresh air and out of bed. < midnight and 15 h./trying to walk/cold air (< Bone pains).
H. suggested Camphora as the homoeoprophylactic simillimum for the approaching epidemic of Asiatic Cholera.
Thuja occidentalis in the prophylactic treatment of smallpox.
This can only be done for those diseases that H. would class as "acute miasms" - diseases that "recur in the same manner and are therefore known by a traditional name".
As an example Scarlatina (scarlet fever) by Hahnemann in 1799 in Königslutter.
We know that this acute miasmatic disease -although certainly individually variable to some extent in its individual presentation- commonly presents with a high. dry, continued fever.
Very often with delirium during the fever; with inflammation of the posterior pharynx with enlarged tonsils and pain on swallowing and hoarseness of the voice; with
anterior cervical adenopathy; with a characteristic red sandpaper rash; with cracked lips. fissured tongue. and prominent papillae of the tongue which may form the characteristic strawberry-tongue appearance; and with nasal coryza.
The genus epidemicus may fail to act -prophylactically and in treatment of active epidemic disease- when the reaction of the patient is dictated more by the pre-existing chronic disease
of the patient than by the virulence of the acute miasmatic organism.
We might imagine (somewhat simplistically) that the direction a disharmony takes in any particular case of disease is a balancing act between the direction a morbid
influence is trying to push us. and the direction in which we are naturally inclined to fall.
For most of the population. it seems that the 'flu' virus is a virulent-enough agent that we mostly fall ill in the same manner. in relative disregard to our individual
situations. But for those whose dynamis is occupied with an active chronic disease. the reaction to the 'flu' virus may have more to do with the disharmony of that
pre-existing disease of the person than it does with the reaction that the rest of the population experiences to the virus.
Consequently. their 'flu' is unique. and does not bear similitude to the genus epidemicus that prevails in the larger community. If their chronic disharmony can in its
own individual manner embrace the disharmony invited by the 'flu virus'. the 'flu' takes on an individual character in that patient.
If the chronic disharmony of the patient is sufficiently dissimilar to the demands made by the virus. the patient may even be "protected" from this acute illness by
their chronic dissimilar disease. We all have seen cases like this. where our patient is impressed that they have avoided colds and flu for the past several years.
despite being debilitated by (e.g.) chronic rheumatoid arthritis.
As an example of this. during the '97-98 'flu epidemic. a patient presented ill with 'flu'. with acute symptoms indicating Bry. and clearly not fitting the
Eupatorium perfoliatum genus epidemicus which at that point had already seemed to be well-established for that 'flu' season.
She responded nicely to Bryonia. prescribed on her individual picture. and later returned (inspired by this successful treatment) for attention to some chronic complaints.
She had long-standing gynecologic symptoms and premenstrual irritability. and Sepia was found as a clear simillimum to her chronic case. Bry. a common complementary remedy to Sepia
(one of the classic pairings of our MM). and it became clear why. when the 'flu' virus came to town. she more easily fell into this complementary Bryonia state than the Eupatorium state that
was affecting the larger community.
For individuals with active chronic disease. the most effective strategy for epidemic prophylaxis may be to treat with the simillimum for the pre-existing chronic disease of the patient. rather
than focusing on the acute disease as it is seen in the remainder of the community. Kent introduced the notion that all acute disease is predicated on psora (pre-existing chronic disease); though
it is difficult to determine how this belief affected his actual clinical practice in the treatment of acute disease. Kent's assertion would suggest that acute diseases do not occur for those in perfect health - certainly a radical concept. and one that is at clear variance with Hahnemann's views and observations on the matter. The notion that we can address acute disease adequately by always focusing exclusively on the chronic is one that has found its way into contemporary homoeopathy as well as into many contemporary "new age" medical philosophies. In the prophylaxis of acute epidemic disease. when are we best to focus on the epidemic and when is it more appropriate to focus on the chronic?
Some suggest that we should always give the chronic remedy in acute disease. Is there always a chronic remedy indicated or identifiable for the person who appears to be in previously good health? When a chronic disease is present. does it always dictate the direction of acute illness?
It is my impression that simplistic or theoretically derived answers will not suffice here. Many apparently acute diseases clearly represent the acute flare-up of pre-existing chronic disease.
sometimes under the influence of an external morbific influence. such as the 'flu' case described directly above. Others appear to represent the direct
action of an acute morbific agent on an otherwise healthy dynamis. or the acute diversion of the dynamis from a previously existing chronic disharmony. It appears to me
that. in order to ensure and maintain health. we need to attend equally to both the chronic and the acute. assessing the needs of our patient on a case-by-case basis.
When and who to treat prophylactically?
At first glance it might seem appropriate to treat everyone -or anyone who desires it- prophylactically for such epidemic acute illnesses as measles. whooping cough. scarlatina. mumps. influenza. etc. when these visit the neighborhood. However. on greater reflection. there may be some concerns with doing this. Is there value to our system in spontaneously going through an acute disease?
Does the immune system benefit from the experience of sustaining us thru measles?
Will prophylaxis of chickenpox as a child open us to the risk of contracting this disease as an adult. when it is of much greater concern? Are some of these acute expressions
of disease opportunities for the system to throw off a chronic miasmatic burden that might otherwise contribute to chronic degenerative disease? Does homoeoprophylaxis
interfere with the dynamis' response to an acute morbific influence. or does it assist us in making a more balanced response. permitting us any benefits of the experience but tempering the process
so that this is done without disease?
We have only to look at our allopathic colleagues and the evolution of their acceptance of universal immunization to see how cavalier one can become with these questions.
From cautious application in such ravaging diseases as smallpox. we are now being encouraged to immunize against the common inconveniencing diseases of childhood
in order to minimize lost work days for parents.
Until answers to some of these questions are in. my position is to provide prophylactic treatment on a case-by-case and epidemic-by-epidemic basis. always considering
the larger issues raised above.
Table 1 Nosodes for the homoeoprophylaxis of epidemic and sporadic acute diseases
Whooping cough (pertussis) Pertussin
Scarlatina Scarletininum. Streptococcinum
Strep pharyngitis Streptococcinum
Propionibacterium acne nosode und Diptherinum
Rabies/Hydrophobia Lyssin (Hydrophobinum)
Table 2 "Central" remedies to consider for the homoeoprophylaxis of sporadic and epidemic acute diseases
Whooping cough (pertussis) Drosera
Strep pharyngitis Mercurius vivus
Rotoviral diarrhea Bismuth*
Travelers' diarrhea (- coli) Bismuth*
Epidemic conjunctivitis / Pink eye Mercurius vivus (though varies greatly)
Epiglottitis Hepar sulphuris
Lyme disease Ledum
*This very likely explains the effectiveness of Pepto-Bismol®. a commonly-used and conventionally-recommended preventive and early-treatment option for these conditions
Xanthium spinosum (= Cockle/said to be specific for hydrophobia, recommended for chronic cystitis in women).
Apis. Diph. Lac-c.
The Indian government tested the use of Belladonna to prevent Japanese Encephalitis and noted mortality was greatly reduced
Haemophilus influenza type B
Bell. Canth. Hyos. Stram. Lyssin. Ars.
Clarke. Ruddock. Boericke. Allen. Tyler
Influenzinum Nosode (hispanicum)
H1N1 = Spanish flue
Hydr-ac. (?cyanatum Gruppe?)
China. Malaria officinalis. Morbillinum
Boericke. Allen. Hering
Trif-r. Parotidinum Arn. Led. Thuj. Arn. Tetano-toxine
Pneumococcinum prevents pneumonia.
Cocc-i. Cur. Gels. Lath-s. Carb-ac. Lath-s. Plb-met. Physos.
Boericke Schmidt Ruddoc
Led. Thuj. Arn. Tetano-toxine Mag-p. Hyper.
Schmidt Grimmer Boericke
Genus: [H.V. Miller]
In the characteristics of Arsenicum will be found such complete indication for its use in any stage of typhoid, typhus or yellow fever that the baneful effects of a routine practice may be avoided.
Bell. Rhus-t. Bry.
Hahnemann [Dr. W.H. Dickinson]
All-s. Puls. Coqueluchin = Pertussinum Dros. Vaccin.. Carb-v. Cupr-met. Dros. Coc-c.
Grimmer Lehman Clarke Boericke Grimmer Farrington
When a remedy specific to the individual occurrence of an epidemic -the genus epidemicus- is identified. this remedy will act more surely in homoeoprophylaxis and early treatment of cases. and is to
be preferred to the approaches described above. This genus epidemicus may often become clear following the treatment of 5-6 cases in a particular epidemic; though it may require additional cases to
obtain a clear picture. particularly when the situation is complicated by the presence of more than one viral illness moving through the community.
This remedy will not only be useful in prophylaxis. but will often be the simillimum to developed cases of the acute disease.
Finding the Genus Epidemicus of Necrotising Fasciitis.
No remedy gives such universally good results; it lessens the sugar and quantity of the urine; he recommended the 3X trituration. It is when the disease is due to assimilative derangements
that Uranium nitricum is the remedy. and symptoms such as defective digestion. languor. debility and much sugar in the urine. enormous appetite and thirst. yet the patient continues to emaciate.
[Hahnemannian Monthly Volume-II Jan - Dec I917]
When we find in a family a case of infectious typhoid fever. the same remedy. which has been given the patient in accordance with his symptoms. will also be sure to protect those in the house
from infection. as it destroys the natural disposition thereto.
Pockenvorbeugung: Ant-t. Hydr. Kali-cy. Maland. Sarr. Thuj. Vac. Vario.
Hallix valgus = Bunion
Nit-ac.:for bunions with swelling and with stinging pains. Almost a specific.
My views on Genus Epidemicus in Homoeopathy
There is an old saying. “An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure”.
Hahnemann applied a similar maxim to Homeopathy. In the footnote to aphorism 73 H. says. “Scarlet fever found its preventative and curative means in Belladonna”.
One of the common surmounted topics in contemporary homoeopathy is the understanding of the preventive treatment of acute epidemic disease.
Yet a review of homoeopathy's 214 year history reveals that this is a coliseum in which we have seen some of the greatest examples of the effectiveness of our science.
At the threshold let me draw a clear cut difference between homoeopathic vaccination and homoeopathic prophylaxis while homoeopathic vaccination involves the use of routine combinations
and series of nosodes in an effort to confer long-term resistance to a variety of diseases.
In contrast. homoeopathic prophylaxis involves the use of individual remedies. selected according to the laws of similars and doctrine of individuality in a strictly non-specific manner. to wipe
out the morbidity of epidemic and sporadic contagious acute diseases in the short term.
(In the language of Hahnemann as mentioned in Organon the "Organon of the Medical Art" by Samuel Hahnemann edited by Wenda O'Reilly)
Homoeopathic vaccination one can say is a classical example of contemporary innovation. borrowing on the notoriety of allopathic vaccination; whereas homoeopathic prophylaxis
is well rooted in classical homeopathic practice.
We don't have to search far in the historical record to find examples of the effective use of homoeopathic prophylaxis.
In 1799 3 years after the "nativity" of homoeopathy in Hahnemann's landmark article Essay on a New Principle which achieved fame throughout Europe from his exceptionally effective treatment
of a Scarlatina epidemic that was sweeping Germany. He wrote: “I resolved in this case of scarlet fever just in the act of breaking out. not to act as usual in reference to individual symptoms. but
if possible (in accordance with my new synthetical principle) to obtain a remedy whose peculiar mode of action was calculated to produce in the healthy body most of the morbid symptoms
which I observed combined in this disease.
My memory and my written collection of the peculiar effects of some medicines. furnished me with no remedy so capable of producing a counterpart of the symptoms here present. as Bell.”
Hahnemann after an arduous experience of treating the very first epidemic of his life published a small pamphlet “Cure and Prevention of Scarlet Fever” in 1801. At the time he promoted
Belladonna as a specific prophylactic remedy for Scarlatina and accompanying each pamphlet he sold, a vial of Belladonna prepared according to his technique at that time.
With increased experience observing and treating epidemic illnesses. Hahnemann recognized the unique nature of each occurrence of an epidemic.
Aconite proved to be the specific for a subsequent Scarlatina epidemic sweeping Germany between 1800 and 1808.
In 1808 Hahnemann yet wrote another scientific paper “Observations on the Scarlet Fever”. here he carefully described how the two epidemic of same disease Scarlet fever needs two
different remedies (Bell./Acon.) he once again stressed on the principle of art of observation and individualization.
An approach to treat epidemics using homoeopathic prophylaxis:
The main aim of every homoeopathic physician is to select one remedy what we call in classical homoeopathy as genus epidemicus.
In homeo prophylaxis we see two approaches the most common which I see being practiced all over the world is the use of diseased nosode e.g. the use of Coqueluchinum in whooping
cough prophylaxis or Parotidinum in a mumps epidemic. Closely related to this would be the use of the sarcode Anas barbare hepatis et cardus extractum (liver and heart of the Barbary duck)
Derived from tissues of the native host of influenza. this remedy is prepared from tissue containing and reacting to the influenza virus.
The nosode represents the undifferentiated or generic appearance of an acute miasm. not accounting for individual variability of persons or individual epidemic occurrences. Its routine use in active disease would be considered isopathy rather than homoeopathy; and historical experience reveals the general inadequacy of this approach.
I personally am not in favour of this method however. this may be a successful strategy in a pinch. particularly early in the epidemic of an acute miasmatic illness. and before a genus epidemicus -the specific remedy for the individual epidemic- has been identified. Following Hering's introduction of nosodes into our Materia Medica. Boenninghausen experimented early on. with considerable success. at using Variolinum (smallpox nosode) for the prophylactic treatment of smallpox.
The second approach is to select a remedy deemed central to the undifferentiated or generic nature of the epidemic illness. This is done by taking an anamnesis of the disease -as- named. without specific attention to the individuality of the prevailing epidemic or the individuality of a specific case. Examples might include Drosera for whooping cough or Bromium for Mumps.
Here again the individual nature of the particular epidemic is not taken into account. and this approach works best with those epidemic illnesses that can be termed acute miasms-ones in which there is less variability in individual expression. Hahnemann in this manner suggested Camphora as the homoeoprophylactic simillimum for the approaching epidemic of Asiatic cholera.
Boenninghausen had some excellent success in using Thuja occidentalis in this manner in the prophylactic treatment of smallpox.
This of course can only be done for those diseases that Hahnemann would class as "acute miasms" - diseases that "recur in the same manner and are therefore known by a traditional name".
As an example. we could look at Swine flu epidemic that hit India very badly recently.
We know that this acute miasmatic disease -although certainly individually variable to some extent in its individual presentation- commonly presents with:
A sudden fever (a high body temperature of 38° C/100.4° F or above).
A sudden cough.
Other symptoms may include:
Diarrhoea or stomach upset
Loss of appetite.
Severe body ache with sore pains all over the body
From the Synthesis10 Repertory. we could select the following rubrics to represent these common or generic symptoms of Swineflu epidemic.
HEAD - PAIN < during fever
HEAD - PAIN during influenza
NOSE - CATARRH
NOSE - CORYZA from influenza
NOSE - OBSTRUCTION
THROAT - INFLAMMATION - Nasopharynx acute
THROAT - INFLAMMATION of Pharynx
THROAT - PAIN < during fever
THROAT - PAIN sore (+ coryza)
RECTUM - DIARRHEA during influenza;
COUGH < during FEVER
CHEST - INFLAMMATION - of bronchial tubes/of lungs
CHEST - PARALYSed lung
FEVER + coryza
FEVER with chill
GENERALS - INFLUENZA (+ pain in bones/bruised pain)
GENERALS - PAIN sore
GENERALS - WEAKNESS excessiv/< during fever
The striking similitude of Baptisia to the generic undifferentiated picture of Swine flu stands out. Closely following is Camph. Eupat-per. Gels. and the small remedy Lobelia purpurascens.
These remedies all address the essential characteristics of swine flu -the genus of the disease- but they do so in their own varied manners. each differing somewhat from the generic.
undifferentiated similarity of Baptisia to the scarlatina disease-state.
In the year 1800. John Minz. Canton. Ohio USA. witnessed an epidemic of scarlatina not responding to commonly indicated remedies. An excoriating nasal discharge. swelling of the glands.
boring of the nose to this individual epidemic led him to select Arum triphyllum for this peculiar case. which he applied with great success. This individualization to a particular occurrence
of an epidemic is key to select genus epidemicus.
The two approaches mentioned above -the use of the acute- disease nosode. and the identification of a genus remedy for the acute miasm have successfully employed by homoeopaths all
over the world. In their earliest stages. these diseases are often ill defined. or generic in appearance; e.g. in flu. there is a mild poorly defined malaise with fever mild body ache; in mumps.
fever with mild pain near the jaw on eating and mild rash; etc. As the individual case of disease evolves. differentiating features then appear which further characterize the case and point
to an individually specific simillimum; but early on. this less-differentiated disharmony may respond to a remedy bearing more generic similarity.
When a remedy specific to the individual occurrence of an epidemic -the genus epidemicus- is identified. this remedy will act more surely in homoeoprophylaxis.
This genus epidemicus may often become clear following the treatment of 10 - 15 cases in a particular epidemic; though it may require additional cases to obtain a clear picture. particularly
when the situation is complicated by the presence of more than one viral illness moving through the community.
This remedy will not only be useful in prophylaxis. but will often be the simillimum to developed cases of the acute disease.
Finding the Genus Epidemicus Hahnemann describes the process of determining the genus epidemicus concisely. in his Organon:
Usually the physician does not immediately perceive the complete picture of the epidemic in the first case that he treats. since the collective disease reveals it self in the totality of signs
and symptoms only after several cases have been closely observed. Nevertheless. an observant physician can often come so close after seeing only one or two patients that he becomes
aware of the characteristic picture of the epidemic and can already find its appropriate homoeopathic remedy.
From writing down the symptoms of several cases of this sort. the outline of the disease picture becomes more and more complete -not more extensive and wordy. but more characteristic.
containing more accurately the peculiarity of the particular collective disease. The ordinary symptoms -e.g.. loss of appetite. sleeplessness. etc.- become more precisely qualified. and those
that are more exceptional. special. and. in the circumstances. unusual. and belong to only a few diseases. reveal themselves and constitute the characteristic picture of this epidemic.
All those who catch an epidemic at a particular time have a disease flowing from the same source and therefore the same disease. But the entire scope of such an epidemic disease. the
totality of its symptoms (which we need to know in order to grasp the whole disease picture and choose an appropriate remedy for it) cannot be perceived in any one patient. but can
be fully distilled and gathered only from the sufferings of several patients with different physical constitutions.
In subsequent cases either the appropriateness of the homoeopathic remedy chosen in the first cases will be corroborated or else a more appropriate one. the most appropriate one. will be
revealed to the physician.
Potency and dose
Potency and dosage for prophylactic treatment are guided by the same issues that guide the treatment of other acute illnesses;
One has consider the susceptibility. the constitution etc.
In general. the lower potencies suffice. I'll commonly use 30C or 200C. occasionally 1M.
Few doses in pills form diluted with distilled water will confer good protection.
This frequency of repetition has as much to do with the pace of the disease and the (similar) pace of the remedy as it does with the duration of the epidemic.
Plague generally has a rapid and furious pace. calling for a simillimum (e.g.. Pyrogen) with a matching pace and more limited duration of action. Influenza more often has a more indolent
pace. calling for a simillimum of matching slow pace (e.g.. Bry. Gels.) and longer duration of action.
[Dr. Y.R. Agrawal]
Prophylactics in Homoeopathy
Catheter Fever: Camphoric Acid is recommended as a prophylactic for catheter fever. (Boericke)
Cerebro-spinal Fever: Meningo-Coccin.
Chicken-Pox: Ant-t. Rhus t.: prophylactic against chickenpox. (Mackenzie)
Cholera: H. according to the circumstances Camphor. Verat. Cupr-met. as preventives or prophylactics of cholera. The selection of the preventive remedy must, to some extent be governed
by the nature of the epidemic and. therefore, the best preventive can not always be determined until the epidemic has appeared and its peculiar (specific) nature is ascertained.
The sprinkling of suspected strangers on their arrival, and of suspected goods and letters with camphor spirit, would most certainly destroy the cholera miasm in them.
In his treatise of September, 1831, H., "Everyone can use Camphor with his own people when they fall sick because he himself will be protected by the vapours of camphor
and so long he continues to use he will remain unharmed."
Cupr-met.: cases of a convulsive character,
Camph.: cases characterised by extreme coldness, and more or less dryness,
Verat.: copious sweat, vomiting, and purging are the features. That is little to remember, but with that you can enter an epidemic of cholera with confidence.
"The dose must be repeated almost immediately if the treatment should have any lasting result. In such cases the camphor spirit given every five minutes, must be continued only so long
as there results from it manifest improvement (which will be known within a quarter of an hour). If there is no very soon a striking improvement, we must not hesitate to at once proceed to
the second stage e.g., 2 or 3 pillets of the medicine of refined Cuprum. If in spite of the use of preventive Cuprum, the patient should be seized with cholera, he must at once when taken
sick -I mean in the first moments or minutes where always, though it may be for a short time, the first stage is present- be nevertheless treated with camphor." (Hahnemann)
Cuprum aceticum 3x to be taken in water (five drops), night and morning.
Cuprum met: It was noticed that during the epidemic of 1849, in Paris, workers in brass and copper establishments escaped the disease. It posesses considerable quality as a prophylactic in
the disease. A dose of Cupr-met. should be taken every third day, on rising in the morning.
The preparations of copper (one or two globules of Cuprum 0,00x) together with good and moderate diet, and proper attention to cleanliness, is the most effective preventive and protective
remedy. Those in health should take once every week, a small globule of it in the morning, fasting and not to drink immediately any liquid afterwards, but this should not be done until the cholera
is in the locality itself or in the neighbourhood.
Chinin-s.: according to an old German practitioner (Dr. Aegidi) is to be used for the precursory stage of cholera. He gave Chinin-s. 0.01 to 0.06. one dose every evening for eight days
and none of the persons thus treated were attacked by cholera.
In some epidemics, Sulphur has been the best prophylactic. It will be suitable in diarrhoea if it comes on in the night, after midnight, the stool being yellow, pappy and attended by great
urgency, though the urging is often ineffectual; and if at the same time, there are cramps in the soles of the feet.
It is especially indicated in hot, damp, stiffling weather, the exact meteorological condition of sun stroke and it has at least in my practice, proved itself adequate to the occasion.
I recommend Glon. 10M as a preventive against sun stroke. (Pierre Schmidt)
Phosphorus 200 is prophylactic against fear before an operation.
Arn.: prevents the shock of operation.
Arn.: considered as a pyaemic prophylactic. Dr. Farrington says that some surgeons use Arnica after operations, applying it locally and give it internally.
Rhus-t.: is the best prophylactic for cases of surgery. It should be given for 48 hours in 30th dilution every three hours. It will prevent sepsis.
Calen.: will largely prevent scars, also gangrene and tetanus when used as a dressing on wound. (Anshutz)
In cases of abdominal surgery, where the conditions are such that sepsis is feared for; give Rhus-t. C 6 every two hours. This remedy possesses the power of prevention of sepsis. (A.N. Mukherji)
Ledum if given before tetanus comes on will save from tetanus and after the jerking comes on Ledum will not do but Hypericum must be given. (J.T. Kent)
For trismus from injury to nerves*
Hyper.: considered prophylactic in cases of wounds of palms or soles, useful in spinal injury - tetanus.
Ledum Palustre is a preventive medicine if an accident happens to the end of the fingers, if a patient steps on a nail or sticks a splinter under a finger nail or into the foot.
The odour of the flowers is disliked by mosquitoes; and the smoke of the burning plant will drive mice and lizards from houses. (Bering's Guiding Symptoms Vol III P-262)
Einen schönen Übersichtsartikel gibt es zum Thema der homöopathischen Prophylaxe von P. Sankaran. Einige Beispiele:
Rubini: Camphora 5 Tropfen Urtinktur dreimal tgl.
Hahnemann: Camphora, Cuprum oder Veratrum album
Hering: Sulfur C1 oder C6 zweimal tgl.
Schmidt: Diphtherinum 10M (es gibt einige Erfahrungsberichte über Diphtherinum 30 oder 200 zur Prophylaxe in Epidemien)
Clarke: Arsenicum album C3 alle 8 Stunden
Schmidt: Influenzinum 200 3 Gaben im Abstand von 8 Stunden
Younan: „Wenn es ein prophylaktisches Mittel gegen Grippe gibt, ist es Nux v.“
Grimmer: Lathyrus sativus („Eines der am meisten konstanten Spezifika ist Lathyrus.
Klinisch war es fast bis zu 100% effektiv. Lathyrus hat sich über einen Zeitraum von 30 Jahren in vielen tausenden von Fällen die der Infektion ausgesetzt waren als vorbeugend erwiesen“).
Oder das vorherrschende epidemische Mittel, wie Cocculus, Curare oder Gelsemium
Schmidt: Variolinum 200, M und XM im Abstand von 24 Stunden